Background noise does not modify song-induced genic activation in the bird brain

Specialised brain structures allow songbirds to process acoustic signals. One of these brain areas, the NCM (caudomedial neostriatum), shows an immediate-early gene ZENK response when a bird hears a conspecific song. Using a neuro-ethological approach, we investigate if high level of background noise added to conspecific song can modify this song-induced genic activation. We test the ZENK activation in the NCM of adult male Zebra finches Taeniopygya guttata (n = 17) by playing back conspecific signals mixed with different levels of noise, the successful discrimination being reflected by the birds' (n = 6) behavioural responses to these stimuli. From our results, it appears that a high genic activation of the NCM does not necessarily require the audition of an undegraded species-specific signal. Nevertheless, it requires that the signal still contains sufficient information to elicit a behavioural response. The genic activation of the NCM remains thus stable against very high levels of a wide-band background noise, as far as the signal recognition remains possible for the bird.

[1]  D. J. Bailey,et al.  The hippocampus and caudomedial neostriatum show selective responsiveness to conspecific song in the female zebra finch. , 2002, Journal of neurobiology.

[2]  Roy Stripling,et al.  Response Modulation in the Zebra Finch Neostriatum: Relationship to Nuclear Gene Regulation , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Vicario,et al.  Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Motor-driven gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  R. Dooling,et al.  Free-field binaural unmasking in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  I. Charrier,et al.  Vocal signature recognition of mothers by fur seal pups , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  C. Mello,et al.  Song-induced ZENK gene expression in auditory pathways of songbird brain and its relation to the song control system , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  For Whom The Bird Sings Context-Dependent Gene Expression , 1998, Neuron.

[9]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Habitat‐induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal‐to‐noise ratio in blackbird song , 1993 .

[10]  R J Dooling,et al.  Hearing in passerine and psittacine birds: a comparative study of absolute and masked auditory thresholds. , 1987, Journal of comparative psychology.

[11]  G. Klump,et al.  Comodulation masking release in a songbird , 1995, Hearing Research.

[12]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  Response biases in auditory forebrain regions of female songbirds following exposure to sexually relevant variation in male song. , 2001, Journal of neurobiology.

[13]  David S. Vicario,et al.  Sex differences in discrimination of vocal communication signals in a songbird , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  G. E. Vates,et al.  Auditory pathways of caudal telencephalon and their relation to the song system of adult male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata) , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  Does sex or photoperiodic condition influence ZENK induction in response to song in European starlings? , 1999, Brain Research.

[16]  Sidarta Ribeiro,et al.  ZENK protein regulation by song in the brain of songbirds , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  Sidarta Ribeiro,et al.  Toward a Song Code Evidence for a Syllabic Representation in the Canary Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[18]  R. Dooling,et al.  Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[20]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Acoustic communication in birds , 2003 .

[21]  M. D. Beecher,et al.  Kin recognition in birds , 1988, Behavior genetics.

[22]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Repeated exposure to one song leads to a rapid and persistent decline in an immediate early gene's response to that song in zebra finch telencephalon , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[24]  T. Aubin,et al.  How to vocally identify kin in a crowd: The penguin model , 2002 .

[25]  S J Chew,et al.  A large-capacity memory system that recognizes the calls and songs of individual birds. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  J. Bolhuis,et al.  Localized neuronal activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song learning. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Amy A. Kruse,et al.  Development of song responses in the zebra finch caudomedial neostriatum: role of genomic and electrophysiological activities. , 2001, Journal of neurobiology.

[28]  Timothy Q Gentner,et al.  They’re Playing Our Song Gene Expression and Birdsong Perception , 1998, Neuron.

[29]  C. Mello,et al.  Mapping vocal communication pathways in birds with inducible gene expression , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  C. Vianna,et al.  Analysis of Immediate-Early Gene Expression in the Songbird Brain Following Song Presentation , 1993 .

[31]  Influence of restraint and acute isolation on the selectivity of the adult zebra finch zenk gene response to acoustic stimuli , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.