Implications and methods for co-existing automotive radar and communication systems

5G mobile communication systems allow small cells with low latencies and high data rates by increasing the carrier frequency. Implemented for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) or other vehicle related (V2x) communication, it supports progress in safe automated driving. Spectrum sharing of V2x and radar reduces hardware efforts and costs. Here, we compare radar and communication systems and analyze the impact of their co-existence on a commercial automotive radar system. Besides orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), we consider two pulse based communication systems. The analysis is performed using interference models and a sensor model that was validated with real world measurements. We further suggest a sub-Nyquist V2x receiver using noise modulated pulses to mitigate interference on automotive radar systems. Its pulsed shape reduces the interference duration significantly compared to communication systems using OFDM.

[1]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sub-Nyquist Sampling for Power Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radios: A Unified Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sub-Nyquist Radar via Doppler Focusing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Compressive sensing-based noise radar for automotive applications , 2016, 2016 12th IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC).

[4]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sub-Nyquist Radar: Principles and Prototypes , 2018, Compressed Sensing in Radar Signal Processing.

[5]  Waheed U. Bajwa,et al.  Geometry of random Toeplitz-block sensing matrices: bounds and implications for sparse signal processing , 2012, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Jurgen Dickmann,et al.  Minimizing interference in automotive radar using digital beamforming , 2011 .

[8]  Wolfgang Menzel,et al.  Automotive radar – investigation of mutual interference mechanisms , 2010 .

[9]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Overview of Millimeter Wave Communications for Fifth-Generation (5G) Wireless Networks—With a Focus on Propagation Models , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[10]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Spectrum Sharing Radar: Coexistence via Xampling , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[11]  Roberto Sarmiento,et al.  Towards improved Validation of Autonomous Systems for Smart Farming , 2018 .

[12]  Jian Li,et al.  One-bit digital radar , 2017, 2017 51st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers.

[13]  Christian Waldschmidt,et al.  Interference of chirp sequence radars by OFDM radars at 77 GHz , 2017, 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM).

[14]  Thomas Zwick,et al.  A novel technique for interference mitigation in OFDM radar using compressed sensing , 2017, 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM).

[15]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Spectrum Sharing Solution for Automotive Radar , 2017, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).