Factors associated with producing a scientific publication during medical training: evidence from a cross-sectional study of 40 medical schools in Latin America

Background: Scientific publication during medical training is key to promote enduring cutting-edge knowledge. The promotion of science among medical students in Latin America is a multi-sphere issue hampered by the unawareness of governments to invest in national research, as well as a lack of support from local universities. This study aims to determine the factors associated with producing a scientific publication during medical training among Latin American medical students of local scientific societies. Methods: This is a secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study initially conducted in 2016 to evaluate the use of information and communications technologies (TICs) among medical students of 40 local scientific societies of medical students affiliated to the Latin American Federation of Medical Students Scientific Societies (FELSOCEM, in Spanish). Teams in each local scientific society surveyed self-reported scientific publications and explored its association with socioeconomic, academic, and research training conditions. We included medical students enrolled in the 2016-I term and excluded medical interns. We implemented nested models to identify covariates associated with self-reported scientific publication until reaching a parsimonious mixed-effect multilevel model clustered by medical scientific society. Results: We surveyed 11,587 medical students. The prevalence of Open Peer Review

[1]  E. Ross This English language , 2007 .

[2]  A. Link US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  Jonathan P. Man,et al.  Why do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals , 2003, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[4]  C. Huamaní,et al.  Aporte estudiantil en la publicación de artículos científicos en revistas médicas indizadas en Scielo-Perú, 1997 - 2005 , 2013 .

[5]  Janet Molina-Ordóñez,et al.  Apreciación estudiantil sobre la capacitación universitaria en investigación: estudio preliminar , 2008 .

[6]  W. Mendoza,et al.  Globalized research and "national science": the case of Peru. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[7]  Álvaro Taype-Rondan,et al.  Aporte de las sociedades estudiantiles en la publicación científica en Scielo-Perú, 2009 - 2010 , 2011 .

[8]  P. Mayta-Tristán,et al.  Publicación de los trabajos presentados a los congresos científicos de estudiantes de medicina, Perú 2002-2009: características y factores asociados. , 2012 .

[9]  T. Mielenz,et al.  Relationship Between Time of First Publication and Subsequent Publication Success Among Non-PhD Physician-Scientists. , 2012, Journal of graduate medical education.

[10]  Álvaro Taype-Rondan,et al.  PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE LAS SOCIEDADES CIENTÍFICAS DE ESTUDIANTES DE MEDICINA DEL PERÚ, 2002-2012 , 2013 .

[11]  D. Danda Cost of publication – Who pays for it? , 2014, International journal of rheumatic diseases.

[12]  J. Machado-Alba,et al.  The role of research incubators in encouraging research and publication among medical students. , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  Virgilio E. Failoc-Rojas,et al.  Participación en sociedades científicas estudiantiles y en cursos extracurriculares de investigación, asociados a la producción científica de estudiantes de medicina humana: estudio preliminar , 2015 .

[14]  Q. Schiermeier Pirate research-paper sites play hide-and-seek with publishers , 2015, Nature.

[15]  E. Dorsey,et al.  The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. , 2015, JAMA.

[16]  D. Heimburger,et al.  Impact of Global Health Research Training on Career Trajectories: The Fogarty International Clinical Research Scholars and Fellows Program. , 2015, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[17]  J. Huaman,et al.  Responsabilidad social en estudiantes de medicina: experiencia de una sociedad científica estudiantil peruana , 2016 .

[18]  Ahmed E. Radwan,et al.  Medical undergraduates' contributions to publication output of world's top universities in 2013. , 2016, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[19]  J. Bohannon Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone. , 2016, Science.

[20]  L. Pellanda,et al.  Interest in research among medical students: Challenges for the undergraduate education. , 2016, Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira.

[21]  Mario J. Valladares-Garrido,et al.  Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America , 2017, PloS one.

[22]  Payal Bhardwaj,et al.  Medical and scientific writing: Time to go lean and mean , 2017, Perspectives in clinical research.

[23]  D. Ciocca,et al.  The reality of scientific research in Latin America; an insider’s perspective , 2017, Cell Stress and Chaperones.

[24]  Matthew B Hoy Sci-Hub: What Librarians Should Know and Do about Article Piracy , 2017, Medical reference services quarterly.

[25]  A. Cvetkovic-Vega Organizaciones científicas estudiantiles como semilleros de líderes y gestores de la investigación científica en el Perú: SOCIMEP , 2017 .

[26]  A. Cvetkovic-Vega Propuesta de una sociedad científica de estudiantes de medicina afiliada a SOCIMEP e IFMSA-Perú: SOCEMURP y su modelo de estructura mixta , 2017 .

[27]  B. Greshake Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage , 2017, bioRxiv.

[28]  A. Kennedy Journal Aspirations: Improving Scientific Writing and Publication Through a Writing Mentorship Program , 2017, International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork.

[29]  F. Bonilla-Escobar,et al.  Medical student researchers in Colombia and associated factors with publication: a cross-sectional study , 2017, BMC Medical Education.

[30]  Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores Memoria Anual 2016 , 2017 .

[31]  Álvaro Taype-Rondan,et al.  Financiamiento de la investigación en pregrado en las facultades de medicina peruanas , 2017 .

[32]  Casey S Greene,et al.  Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature , 2018, eLife.

[33]  Loriene Roy,et al.  What Is a Reference Source? , 2018, The Reference Librarian.

[34]  I. Corrales-Reyes,et al.  Students’ scientific production: a proposal to encourage it. , 2018, Medwave.

[35]  C. R. Mejía,et al.  Carrera previa como factor asociado al uso de buscadores científicos entre estudiantes de medicina latinoamericanos: cuando la experiencia no cuenta , 2019, Educación Médica.

[36]  Brian M. Till,et al.  Who is pirating medical literature? A bibliometric review of 28 million Sci-Hub downloads. , 2019, The Lancet. Global health.

[37]  L. M. Oliveira,et al.  DivulgaMicro : A Brazilian Initiative To Empower Early-Career Scientists with Science Communication Skills† , 2019, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[38]  Aleszu Bajak What should Peru do to improve its science? , 2019, Nature.

[39]  Christopher W. Belter,et al.  Fifty Years of Supporting Global Health Research at the NIH Fogarty International Center , 2019, Annals of global health.

[40]  C. R. Mejía,et al.  Participación en una sociedad científica de estudiantes de Medicina asociada a la producción científica extracurricular en Latinoamérica , 2019, Educación Médica.

[41]  Mario J. Valladares-Garrido,et al.  Associated factors with reaching a scientific publication during medical training: evidence from 40 medical schools surveyed in Latin America. , 2020 .

[42]  D. Resnick,et al.  SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE , 2022 .