Modeling and optimization of electrospun PAN nanofiber diameter using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks

Response surface methodology (RSM) based on a three-level, three-variable Box-Benkhen design (BBD), and artificial neural network (ANN) techniques were compared for modeling the average diameter of electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers. The multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks were trained by the sets of input–output patterns using a scaled conjugate gradient backpropagation algorithm. The three important electrospinning factors were studied including polymer concentration (w/v%), applied voltage (kV) and the nozzle-collector distance (cm). The predicted fiber diameters were in agreement with the experimental results in both ANN and RSM techniques. High-regression coefficient between the variables and the response (R2 = 0.998) indicates excellent evaluation of experimental data by second-order polynomial regression model. The R2 value was 0.990, which indicates that the ANN model was shows good fitting with experimental data. Moreover, the RSM model shows much lower absolute percentage error than the ANN model. Therefore, the obtained results indicate that the performance of RSM was better than ANN. The RSM model predicted the 118 nm value of the finest nanofiber diameter at conditions of 10 w/v% polymer concentration, 12 cm of nozzle-collector distance, and 12 kV of the applied voltage. The predicted value (118 nm) showed only 2.5%, difference with experimental results in which 121 nm at the same setting were observed. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012

[1]  P. J. Brown,et al.  Nanofibers and Nanotechnology in Textiles , 2007 .

[2]  M B Kasiri,et al.  Modeling and optimization of heterogeneous photo-Fenton process with response surface methodology and artificial neural networks. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  R. W. Tock,et al.  Electrospinning of nanofibers , 2005 .

[4]  Mounir Ben Ghalia,et al.  A neural network model for the numerical prediction of the diameter of electro-spun polyethylene oxide nanofibers , 2009 .

[5]  A. Guha,et al.  ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS: APPLICATIONS TO TEXTILES , 2004 .

[6]  M. Kotaki,et al.  A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites , 2003 .

[7]  M. Papila,et al.  Effects of electrospinning parameters on polyacrylonitrile nanofiber diameter: An investigation by response surface methodology , 2008 .

[8]  Jyh-Ping Chen,et al.  Fabrication of electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate) nanofibrous membranes by statistical approach for application in enzyme immobilization , 2009 .

[9]  Sachiko Sukigara,et al.  Regeneration of Bombyx mori silk by electrospinning—part 1: processing parameters and geometric properties , 2003 .

[10]  M. Hasanzadeh,et al.  Using Fuzzy-logic and Neural Network Techniques to Evaluating Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Diameter , 2009 .

[11]  J. Meredith,et al.  A design of experiments (DoE) approach to material properties optimization of electrospun nanofibers , 2010 .

[12]  A. Khataee,et al.  Biological treatment of a dye solution by Macroalgae Chara sp.: effect of operational parameters, intermediates identification and artificial neural network modeling. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[13]  Samson A. Jenekhe,et al.  One-Dimensional Nanostructures of π-Conjugated Molecular Systems: Assembly, Properties, and Applications from Photovoltaics, Sensors, and Nanophotonics to Nanoelectronics† , 2011 .