Understanding Co-development of Conceptual and Epistemic Understanding through Modeling Practices with Mobile Internet

The present study explores how engaging in modeling practice, along with argumentation, leverages students’ epistemic and conceptual understanding in an afterschool science/math class of 16 tenth graders. The study also explores how students used mobile Internet phones (smart phones) productively to support modeling practices. As the modeling practices became more challenging, student discussion occurred more often, from what to model to providing explanations for the phenomenon. Students came to argue about evidence that supported their model and how the model could explain target and related phenomena. This finding adds to the literature that modeling practice can help students improve conceptual understanding of subject knowledge as well as epistemic understanding.

[1]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  How Novice Science Teachers Appropriate Epistemic Discourses Around Model-Based Inquiry for Use in Classrooms , 2008 .

[2]  R. Duschl,et al.  Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis , 2011 .

[3]  L. Schauble,et al.  Cultivating Model-Based Reasoning in Science Education , 2005 .

[4]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century , 2013 .

[5]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[6]  R. Sawyer.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[7]  Cynthia Passmore,et al.  Exploring Opportunities for Argumentation in Modelling Classrooms , 2012 .

[8]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[9]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[10]  Gary W. Ritter,et al.  Next Generation Science Standards , 2013 .

[11]  E. Michael Nussbaum,et al.  Critical Questions and Argument Stratagems: A Framework for Enhancing and Analyzing Students' Reasoning Practices , 2011 .

[12]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .

[13]  S. Erduran,et al.  Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview , 2007 .

[14]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research , 2007 .

[15]  Ben Kelcey,et al.  How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity , 2009 .

[16]  Vanessa Colella,et al.  Participatory Simulations: Building Collaborative Understanding Through Immersive Dynamic Modeling , 2000 .

[17]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Essential Tension , 1977 .

[18]  Niels Pinkwart,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art , 2009 .

[19]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Portable Technologies: Science Learning in Context. Innovations in Science Education and Technology. , 2001 .

[20]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[21]  Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sánchez,et al.  Mobile Learning [Guest editor's introduction] , 2007 .

[22]  Eve Manz,et al.  Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge , 2012 .

[23]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[24]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[25]  R. Duschl.  Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .

[26]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[27]  Ravit Golan Duncan,et al.  Learners' Epistemic Criteria for Good Scientific Models. , 2011 .

[28]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts , 2010 .

[29]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Portable Technologies: Science Learning in Context. Innovations in Science Education and Technology. , 2001 .

[30]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Using handhelds to support collaborative learning , 2002, CSCL.

[31]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The essential tension : selected studies in scientific tradition and change , 1977 .

[32]  Eleni A. Kyza,et al.  A Framework for Scaffolding Students' Assessment of the Credibility of Evidence , 2011 .

[33]  Jang-Ping Sheu,et al.  A mobile butterfly-watching learning system for supporting independent learning , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[34]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[35]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Log on education: Handheld devices are ready-at-hand , 2001, CACM.

[36]  Jason Meyer,et al.  Technology, Pedagogy, and Epistemology: Opportunities and Challenges of Using Computer Modeling and Simulation Tools in Elementary Science Methods , 2007 .

[37]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .

[38]  B. Reiser,et al.  Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .

[39]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments , 2007 .

[40]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Environmental Detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.

[41]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Learning About Statistical Covariation , 2003 .

[42]  William McClune,et al.  How Students Learn , 2010 .

[43]  Phil Seok Oh,et al.  Discursive Modes and Their Pedagogical Functions in Model-Based Inquiry (MBI) Classrooms , 2012 .

[44]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of Teachers' Instructional Practices on Student Learning. , 2008 .

[45]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Supporting Argumentation Through Students' Questions: Case Studies in Science Classrooms , 2010 .

[46]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science , 2002 .

[47]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation , 2012 .

[48]  D. Kuhn.  Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .