Risk-Aversive Behavior Planning under Multiple Situations with Uncertainty

This paper addresses the problem of future behavior evaluation and planning for upcoming ADAS, especially for inner city traffic scenarios. Situations in inner city traffic scenarios are generally highly complex and of high uncertainty. The behavior in such complex scenarios differs strongly depending on the actually occurring situation. In general the current situation can only be determined with high uncertainty based on current and past sensory measurements of the ego entity and the other involved entities. Additionally a situation can change very quickly, e.g. if a traffic participant suddenly changes its behavior. Here we propose an approach how to plan safe, but still efficient future behavior under consideration of multiple possible situations with different occurrence probabilities. For each situation we predict prototypical future trajectories of all involved entities using a highly general, interaction aware model Foresighted Driver Model (FDM). Then, based on a continuous, probabilistic model for future risk, we build so-called predictive risk maps, one for each possible situation, and plan the own behavior while minimizing overall risk and utility. We show that our approach generates efficient behavior for situations with high probability, while generating a "plan b" to safely deal with improbable but risky situations.

[1]  Matthias Althoff,et al.  Model-Based Probabilistic Collision Detection in Autonomous Driving , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Qingfeng Huang,et al.  An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system , 2002, Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37367).

[3]  Volker Willert,et al.  Bayesian, maneuver-based, long-term trajectory prediction and criticality assessment for driver assistance systems , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[4]  Julian Eggert,et al.  The Foresighted Driver Model , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[5]  J. Eggert,et al.  Managing the complexity of inner-city scenes: An efficient situation hypotheses selection scheme , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[6]  Rüdiger Dillmann,et al.  Probabilistic decision-making under uncertainty for autonomous driving using continuous POMDPs , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[7]  Julian Eggert,et al.  Predictive risk estimation for intelligent ADAS functions , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[8]  Martin Buss,et al.  Interactive scene prediction for automotive applications , 2013, 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[9]  Stephen N. Luko,et al.  Risk Management Principles and Guidelines , 2013 .

[10]  Julian Eggert,et al.  Balancing risk against utility: Behavior planning using predictive risk maps , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[11]  Eugen Käfer Situationsklassifikation und Bewegungsprognose in Verkehrssituationen mit mehreren Fahrzeugen , 2013 .

[12]  Julian Eggert,et al.  Predictive risk maps , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).