Using X-Ray Polarimetry to Probe the Physics of Black Holes and Neutron Stars

This white paper highlights compact object and fundamental physics science opportunities afforded by high-throughput broadband (0.1-60 keV) X-ray polarization observations. X-ray polarimetry gives new observables with geometric information about stellar remnants which are many orders of magnitude too small for direct imaging. The X-ray polarimetric data also reveal details about the emission mechanisms and the structure of the magnetic fields in and around the most extreme objects in the Universe. Whereas the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) to be launched in 2021 will obtain first results for bright objects, a follow-up mission could be one order of magnitude more sensitive and would be able to use a broader bandpass to perform physics type experiments for representative samples of sources. Introduction: The recent developments of broadband X-ray focusing mirrors with excellent angular resolution and matched broadband X-ray polarimeters make it possible to design and build sensitive X-ray polarimetry missions. Recognizing the scientific opportunities afforded by X-ray polarimetry, NASA and ASI are currently developing the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) [70], a Small Explorer (SMEX) mission to be launched in 2021, which is expected to measure the polarization in the 2–8 keV energy range. In this white paper, we advocate for the science opportunities afforded by an IXPE follow-up mission, called the X-ray Polarization Probe (XPP) which promises a sensitivity improvement by a factor of 5–10 over IXPE, an energy bandpass broadened from 2–8 keV to 0.1–60 keV, and an angular resolution improvement from 30′′ to 5′′-10′′ half power diameter (HPD). Such a mission will enable physics-type experiments with statistical samples of the most extreme objects in the Universe: black holes and neutron stars (see Table 1), and would allow us to probe matter, fields, and fundamental laws in extreme conditions. Black holes and neutron stars emit a substantial, in most cases even dominant, fraction of their energy in the X-ray band, making this the preferred band for their study. A series of X-ray imaging, spectroscopy and timing missions led to spectacular insights about the nature of these (and other) cosmic X-ray sources, as recognized by Riccardo Giacconi’s share of the 2002 Nobel Prize in Physics. X-ray polarimetry is expected to give another boost to the field by adding two more observables, the polarization fraction and angle, which encode vital information on the geometry of the systems. Importantly, the polarization constrains not only the geometry of the source on femto-arcsecond scales but also the structure of the magnetic and gravitational fields. The measurement of the X-ray polarization will allow us to test our models of the X-ray emission mechanisms, the propagation of the X-rays through the curved spacetime in the vicinity of the compact objects, the competition of plasma and vacuum birefringence, and the nature of X-ray scattering and selective, polarization dependent X-ray absorption [e.g., see the reviews of 50, 44, 69, 6, 40]. IXPE, to be launched in 2021, will be the first dedicated X-ray polarimetry mission following the pioneering OSO-8 mission [e.g. 68], various satellite-borne mission with some polarization sensitivity [i.e. INTEGRAL, ASTROSAT, and Hitomi 18, 67, 35] and purpose-built balloon-borne hard X-ray missions [i.e. PoGO+ and X-Calibur 25, 39]. IXPE will deliver high signal-to-noise polarimetric measurements of the brightest Galactic sources and first results for a few extragalactic sources. In the following, we will highlight several exceptionally promising science opportunities afforded by a XPP-type follow-up mission. Table 1: Summary of source classes (column 1), the fraction and number of sources per source class that can be observed with IXPE (column 2) and XPP (column 3) in 10 s exposures with a certain minimum detectable polarization fraction (<10% for magnetars and blazars,<5% for all other source classes, 99% confidence level) in a sample of bright RXTE sources, as well as prominent science drivers (column 4). Class IXPE XPP Science Drivers Stellar BHs 73% (27) 89% (33) Accretion Disk Dynamics, Role of B-field AGNs 0% (0) 52% (15) Black Hole Spin & Inclination, Corona Geometry Pulsars 41% (16) 95% (37) QED Birefringence Magnetars 0%(0) 57% (8) Stellar Surface, Plasma & QED Birefringence HMXBs 19% (8) 88% (37) Accretion, Plasma & QED Birefringence SNR+PWN 4.5% (1) 77% (17) Origin of Cosmic Rays, Rel. Particle Acc. Blazars 6% (1) 53% (9) Jet Structure, Particle Acceleration

[1]  K. Sinha,et al.  X-ray polarization signals from magnetars with axion-like-particles , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[2]  Matteo Guainazzi,et al.  Detection of polarized gamma-ray emission from the Crab nebula with the Hitomi Soft Gamma-ray Detector† , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan.

[3]  L. Sironi,et al.  Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Plasma Turbulence. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[4]  William H. Lee,et al.  Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A , 2018, Science.

[5]  J. P. Barron,et al.  Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert , 2018, Science.

[6]  William W. Zhang,et al.  Astronomical x-ray optics using mono-crystalline silicon: high resolution, light weight, and low cost , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[7]  D. Hartmann,et al.  Leptonic and Hadronic Modeling of Fermi-LAT Hard Spectrum Quasars and Predictions for High-energy Polarization , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[8]  H. Krawczynski Difficulties of quantitative tests of the Kerr-hypothesis with X-ray observations of mass accreting black holes , 2018, General Relativity and Gravitation.

[9]  K. Sinha,et al.  Constraining axion-like-particles with hard X-ray emission from magnetars , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[10]  Gianluigi De Geronimo,et al.  Optimization of the design of X-Calibur for a long-duration balloon flight and results from a one-day test flight , 2018 .

[11]  J. Heyl,et al.  Vacuum birefringence and the x-ray polarization from black-hole accretion disks , 2018, 1803.03798.

[12]  H. Takahashi,et al.  The PoGO+ Balloon-Borne Hard X-ray Polarimetry Mission , 2018, 1803.02106.

[13]  M. Landoni,et al.  Probing dissipation mechanisms in BL Lac jets through X-ray polarimetry , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[14]  Kristin K. Madsen,et al.  Optical instrument design of the high-energy x-ray probe (HEX-P) , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[15]  H. Krawczynski,et al.  The X-Ray Polarization of the Accretion Disk Coronae of Active Galactic Nuclei , 2017, 1710.00247.

[16]  Giovanni Pareschi,et al.  The rocket experiment demonstration of a soft x-ray polarimeter (REDSoX Polarimeter) , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[17]  R. Bandiera,et al.  Modeling the effect of small-scale magnetic turbulence on the X-ray properties of Pulsar Wind Nebulae , 2017, 1704.06546.

[18]  R. Mignani,et al.  Evidence for vacuum birefringence from the first optical-polarimetry measurement of the isolated neutron star RX J1856.5−3754 , 2016, 1610.08323.

[19]  J. Zrake,et al.  Turbulent Magnetic Relaxation in Pulsar Wind Nebulae , 2016, 1612.02430.

[20]  Astrophysics,et al.  Cyclotron resonant scattering feature simulations I. Thermally averaged cyclotron scattering cross sections, mean free photon-path tables, and electron momentum sampling , 2016, 1609.05030.

[21]  M. Böttcher,et al.  RADIATION AND POLARIZATION SIGNATURES OF THE 3D MULTIZONE TIME-DEPENDENT HADRONIC BLAZAR MODEL , 2016, 1607.06491.

[22]  Martin C. Weisskopf,et al.  The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[23]  E. Puchwein,et al.  The effect of AGN feedback on the X-ray morphologies of clusters: Simulations vs. observations , 2016, 1605.06661.

[24]  Silvia Zane,et al.  Polarized thermal emission from X-ray dim isolated neutron stars: the case of RX J1856.5−3754 , 2016, 1604.01552.

[25]  R. M. Curado da Silva,et al.  XIPE: the X-ray imaging polarimetry explorer , 2013, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[26]  Sabrina Kruger X Ray Polarimetry A New Window In Astrophysics , 2016 .

[27]  S. Lamoreaux,et al.  Experimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Particles , 2015, 1602.00039.

[28]  Tanmoy Chattopadhyay,et al.  Hard X-ray polarimetry with Astrosat-CZTI , 2015 .

[29]  T. Maccarone,et al.  POLARIZATION MODULATION FROM LENSE–THIRRING PRECESSION IN X-RAY BINARIES , 2015, 1505.00015.

[30]  K. Kilaru,et al.  SuperHERO: Design of a new hard-X-ray focusing telescope , 2015, 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[31]  Shouleh Nikzad,et al.  Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , 2014 .

[32]  M. Boettcher,et al.  SYNCHROTRON POLARIZATION IN BLAZARS , 2014, 1401.7138.

[33]  P. Soffitta,et al.  Probing magnetar magnetosphere through X-ray polarization measurements , 2013, 1311.7500.

[34]  R. Narayan,et al.  Black Hole Spin via Continuum Fitting and the Role of Spin in Powering Transient Jets , 2013, Space Science Reviews.

[35]  Laura W. Brenneman,et al.  MEASURING SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE SPINS IN AGN , 2013 .

[36]  Markus Boettcher,et al.  X-RAY AND GAMMA-RAY POLARIZATION IN LEPTONIC AND HADRONIC JET MODELS OF BLAZARS , 2013, 1307.4187.

[37]  E. Feigelson,et al.  The Hot and Energetic Universe: A White Paper presenting the science theme motivating the Athena+ mission , 2013, 1306.2307.

[38]  J. Silk UNLEASHING POSITIVE FEEDBACK: LINKING THE RATES OF STAR FORMATION, SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE ACCRETION, AND OUTFLOWS IN DISTANT GALAXIES , 2013, 1305.5840.

[39]  Takashi Okajima,et al.  White Paper for Blazar Observations with a GEMS-like X-ray Polarimetry Mission , 2013, 1303.7158.

[40]  William W. Zhang,et al.  THE NUCLEAR SPECTROSCOPIC TELESCOPE ARRAY (NuSTAR) HIGH-ENERGY X-RAY MISSION , 2013, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[41]  R. Chevalier,et al.  Diffusion and advection model for particle transport in young pulsar wind nebulae , 2012, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[42]  Andrew C. Fabian,et al.  Observational Evidence of Active Galactic Nuclei Feedback , 2012 .

[43]  R. Chevalier,et al.  PARTICLE TRANSPORT IN YOUNG PULSAR WIND NEBULAE , 2012, 1204.3913.

[44]  H. Krawczynski THE POLARIZATION PROPERTIES OF INVERSE COMPTON EMISSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR BLAZAR OBSERVATIONS WITH THE GEMS X-RAY POLARIMETER , 2011, 1109.2186.

[45]  R. Fern'andez,et al.  THE X-RAY POLARIZATION SIGNATURE OF QUIESCENT MAGNETARS: EFFECT OF MAGNETOSPHERIC SCATTERING AND VACUUM POLARIZATION , 2011, 1101.0834.

[46]  M. Baring,et al.  Scientific Prospects for Hard X-ray Polarimetry , 2010, 1012.0321.

[47]  J. W. den Herder,et al.  A model of polarized X-ray emission from twinkling synchrotron supernova shells , 2009, 0907.2521.

[48]  Julian H. Krolik,et al.  X-RAY POLARIZATION FROM ACCRETING BLACK HOLES: THE THERMAL STATE , 2009, 0902.3982.

[49]  Ramesh Narayan,et al.  INFERRING THE INCLINATION OF A BLACK HOLE ACCRETION DISK FROM OBSERVATIONS OF ITS POLARIZED CONTINUUM RADIATION , 2008, 0809.0866.

[50]  Czech Republic,et al.  Thermal disc emission from a rotating black hole: X-ray polarization signatures , 2008, 0809.0418.

[51]  J. Stephen,et al.  Polarized Gamma-Ray Emission from the Crab , 2008, Science.

[52]  S. Zane,et al.  X-ray spectra from magnetar candidates – II. Resonant cross-sections for electron–photon scattering in the relativistic regime , 2008, 0806.3714.

[53]  J. M. Miller,et al.  Relativistic X-Ray Lines from the Inner Accretion Disks Around Black Holes , 2007, 0705.0540.

[54]  B. Ramsey,et al.  X-Ray Polarimetry and Its Potential Use for Understanding Neutron Stars , 2006, astro-ph/0611483.

[55]  M. Baring,et al.  Resonant Compton upscattering in anomalous X-ray pulsars , 2006, astro-ph/0610382.

[56]  L. Brenneman,et al.  Constraining Black Hole Spin via X-Ray Spectroscopy , 2006, astro-ph/0608502.

[57]  O. Blaes,et al.  Testing Accretion Disk Theory in Black Hole X-Ray Binaries , 2006, astro-ph/0602245.

[58]  B. Gaensler,et al.  The evolution and structure of pulsar wind nebulae , 2006, astro-ph/0601081.

[59]  J. Schnittman Interpreting the High-Frequency Quasi-periodic Oscillation Power Spectra of Accreting Black Holes , 2004, astro-ph/0407179.

[60]  R. Narayan,et al.  Magnetically Arrested Disk : an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow , 2003, astro-ph/0305029.

[61]  Jeremy S. Heyl,et al.  The high-energy polarization-limiting radius of neutron star magnetospheres - I. Slowly rotating neutron stars , 2003, astro-ph/0302118.

[62]  S. R. Kulkarni,et al.  Electrodynamics of Magnetars: Implications for the Persistent X-Ray Emission and Spin-down of the Soft Gamma Repeaters and Anomalous X-Ray Pulsars , 2001, astro-ph/0110677.

[63]  M. Gierliński,et al.  Application of a relativistic accretion disc model to X-ray spectra of LMC X-1 and GRO J1655-40 , 2001, astro-ph/0103362.

[64]  F. Lei,et al.  Compton Polarimetry in Gamma-Ray Astronomy , 1997 .

[65]  J. Heyl,et al.  Birefringence and dichroism of the QED vacuum , 1997, hep-ph/9705367.

[66]  W. Cui,et al.  Black Hole Spin in X-Ray Binaries: Observational Consequences , 1997, astro-ph/9704072.

[67]  J. Hawley,et al.  Instability, turbulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks , 1997 .

[68]  P. Mészáros,et al.  High-energy radiation from magnetized neutron stars , 1992 .

[69]  Nicholas E. White,et al.  X-ray fluorescence from the inner disc in Cygnus X-1 , 1989 .

[70]  Martin C. Weisskopf,et al.  Astrophysical implications and observational prospects of X-ray polarimetry , 1988 .

[71]  R. Blandford,et al.  Hydromagnetic flows from accretion discs and the production of radio jets , 1982 .

[72]  K. Long,et al.  A precision measurement of the X-ray polarization of the Crab Nebula without pulsar contamination. , 1978 .

[73]  R. Blandford,et al.  Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes , 1977 .

[74]  R. Peccei,et al.  CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles , 1977 .

[75]  Stephen L. Adler,et al.  Photon splitting and photon dispersion in a strong magnetic field , 1971 .

[76]  W. Heisenberg,et al.  Folgerungen aus der Diracschen Theorie des Positrons , 1936 .