Soft tissue surgery and scanners: applications and perspectives into clinical research
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Jung,et al. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. , 2014, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[2] S. Logozzo,et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature , 2017, BMC oral health.
[3] G. Christensen. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? , 2008, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[4] P. Kämmerer,et al. A new method for volumetric evaluation of gingival recessions: a feasibility study. , 2012, Journal of periodontology.
[5] D. Tarnow,et al. An open randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate ridge preservation and repair using SocketKAP(™) and SocketKAGE(™) : part 1-three-dimensional volumetric soft tissue analysis of study casts. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.
[6] Peter A. Mossey,et al. Orthodontic Scanners: What's Available? , 2015, Journal of orthodontics.
[7] T Jemt,et al. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. , 1997, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[8] R. Jung,et al. Volumetric changes at pontic sites with or without soft tissue grafting: a controlled clinical study with a 10‐year follow‐up , 2017, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[9] T. Attin,et al. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[10] U. Belser,et al. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.
[11] M. Roos,et al. Comparison between clinical and digital soft tissue measurements. , 2014, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].
[12] P. Miller,et al. A classification of marginal tissue recession. , 1985, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[13] R. Jung,et al. Soft tissue volume augmentation by the use of collagen-based matrices: a volumetric analysis. , 2010, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[14] R Hickel,et al. A New Optical 3-D Device for the Detection of Wear , 1997, Journal of dental research.
[15] D. Tarnow,et al. A classification system for loss of papillary height. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.
[16] Andreas Ender,et al. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[17] D. Cardaropoli,et al. The Papilla Presence Index (PPI): a new system to assess interproximal papillary levels. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[18] S. Logozzo,et al. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study , 2017, BMC Oral Health.
[19] W M Johnston,et al. Assessment of Appearance Match by Visual Observation and Clinical Colorimetry , 1989, Journal of dental research.
[20] Philip Robinson,et al. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression , 2017, Journal of healthcare engineering.
[21] R. Jung,et al. Volumetric changes and peri‐implant health at implant sites with or without soft tissue grafting in the esthetic zone, a retrospective case–control study with a 5‐year follow‐up , 2017, Clinical oral implants research.
[22] Andreas Ender,et al. Volume gain and stability of peri-implant tissue following bone and soft tissue augmentation: 1-year results from a prospective cohort study. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.
[23] T. Attin,et al. In vivo validation of a three-dimensional optical method to document volumetric soft tissue changes of the interdental papilla. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.
[24] P Schärer,et al. Quantitative measurement of volume changes induced by oral plastic surgery: validation of an optical method using different geometrically-formed specimens. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.
[25] S. Heo,et al. Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[26] G. Benic,et al. Prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing two dental implant types: volumetric soft tissue changes at 1 year of loading. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.
[27] S Y Chen,et al. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.
[28] M. Zimmermanna,et al. Intraoral scanning systems – a current overview , 2015 .
[29] Wael Att,et al. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. , 2014, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[30] Andreas Ender,et al. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.
[31] P. Vult von Steyern,et al. Volumetric measurement of dentoalveolar defects by means of intraoral 3D scanner and gravimetric model , 2019, Odontology.
[32] Alejandro Lanis,et al. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report. , 2015, The International journal of prosthodontics.
[33] Urs C. Belser,et al. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores , 2009 .
[34] Sivabalan Vasudavan,et al. Comparison of intraoral 3D scanning and conventional impressions for fabrication of orthodontic retainers. , 2010, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.
[35] U. Brägger,et al. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.