Impact of robot responsiveness and adult involvement on children's social behaviours in human-robot interaction

A key challenge in developing engaging social robots is creating convincing, autonomous and responsive agents, which users perceive, and treat, as social beings. As a part of the collaborative project: Expressive Agents for Symbiotic Education and Learning (EASEL), this study examines the impact of autonomous response to children’s speech, by the humanoid robot Zeno, on their interactions with it as a social entity. Results indicate that robot autonomy and adult assistance during HRI can substantially influence children’s behaviour during interaction and their affect after. Children working with a fully-autonomous, responsive robot demonstrated greater physical activity following robot instruction than those working with a less responsive robot, which required adult assistance to interact with. During dialogue with the robot, children working with the fully-autonomous robot also looked towards the robot in anticipation of its vocalisations on more occasions. In contrast, a less responsive robot, requiring adult assistance to interact with, led to greater selfreport positive affect and more occasions of children looking to the robot in response to its vocalisations. We discuss the broader implications of these findings in terms of anthropomorphism of social robots and in relation to the overall project strategy to further the understanding of how interactions with social robots could lead to task-appropriate symbiotic relationships.

[1]  A. Ito,et al.  Why robots need body for mind communication - an attempt of eye-contact between human and robot , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[2]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[3]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Marko Wagner,et al.  Social Cognitive Development Frontiers And Possible Futures , 2016 .

[5]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot? Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  P. Kay,et al.  Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  C. Frith Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[10]  Brian T. Gill,et al.  "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[11]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  Eye gaze patterns in conversations: there is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes , 2001, CHI.

[12]  S. Tipper,et al.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Emily C. Collins,et al.  Presence of Life-Like Robot Expressions Influences Children’s Enjoyment of Human-Robot Interactions in the Field , 2015 .

[14]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Distributed Adaptive Control: A theory of the Mind, Brain, Body Nexus , 2012, BICA 2012.

[15]  D. Snijders Robot's Recovery from Invading Personal Space , 2015 .

[16]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Understanding children's and adults' limitations in mental state reasoning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Daniel P. Davison,et al.  Towards a child-robot symbiotic co-development: a theoretical approach , 2015, HRI 2015.

[18]  David Hanson,et al.  Zeno: A cognitive character , 2008, AAAI 2008.

[19]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  “The first five seconds”: Contingent stepwise entry into an interaction as a means to secure sustained engagement in HRI , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[20]  Tim M. den Uyl,et al.  Automated facial coding: validation of basic emotions and FACS AUs in FaceReader , 2014 .

[21]  Roger K. Moore,et al.  Children's Age Influences Their Perceptions of a Humanoid Robot as Being Like a Person or Machine , 2015, Living Machines.

[22]  F. R. Harris,et al.  EFFECTS OF ADULT SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT ON CHILD BEHAVIOR. , 1964 .

[23]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  How to build robots that make friends and influence people , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[24]  John W. Maag,et al.  Behavior Management: From Theoretical Implications to Practical Applications , 1999 .

[25]  G. Moskowitz Social Cognition: Understanding Self and Others , 2004 .

[26]  P. Rochat Early Social Cognition : Understanding Others in the First Months of Life , 1999 .

[27]  E. Spelke,et al.  The development of thoughts about animate and inanimate objects: Implications for research in social cognition , 1981 .

[28]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges , 2013, ICSR.

[29]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Child-robot interaction during collaborative game play: effects of age and gender on emotion and experience , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[30]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[31]  Hideki Kozima,et al.  Attention coupling as a prerequisite for social interaction , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..