Validation of a structured interview for the assessment of diabetes self-management.

OBJECTIVE The authors developed and validated a semi-structured interview; the Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP), to measure self-management of type 1 diabetes. The DSMP includes the following regimen components: exercise, management of hypoglycemia, diet, blood glucose testing, and insulin administration and dose adjustment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Families of youths with type 1 diabetes (n = 105) who were entering a controlled trial of intensive therapy (IT) versus usual care (UC) were administered the DSMP Analyses assessed the reliability and validity of the DSMP, including its associations with HbA1c and quality of life. RESULTS The DSMP total score has adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.76), 3-month test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation, r = 0.67), inter-interviewer agreement (r = 0.94), and parent-adolescent agreement (r = 0.61). DSMP total scores (r = -0.28) and 3 subscales correlated significantly with HbA1c (diet [r = -0.27], blood glucose testing [r = -0.37], and insulin administration and dose adjustment [r = -0.25 ]). Adolescents' reports of self-management did not differ from parental reports. Higher DSMP scores were associated with more favorable quality of life for mothers and youths. CONCLUSIONS The DSMP is a convenient measure that yields a reliable and valid assessment of diabetes self-management. Compared with extant similar measures, the DSMP is more strongly correlated with HbA1c.

[1]  Russell E. Glasgow,et al.  Assessing diabetes self-management: The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire. , 1994 .

[2]  L. Howie,et al.  Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose by Adults With Diabetes in the United States Population , 1993, Diabetes Care.

[3]  A. B. Hollingshead,et al.  Four factor index of social status , 1975 .

[4]  R. Glasgow,et al.  In diabetes care, moving from compliance to adherence is not enough. Something entirely different is needed. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[5]  W L McNabb,et al.  Adherence in Diabetes: Can We Define It and Can We Measure It? , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[6]  S. Johnson Methodological Issues in Diabetes Research: Measuring adherence , 1992, Diabetes Care.

[7]  S. Kurtz Adherence to Diabetes Regimens: Empirical Status and Clinical Applications , 1990, The Diabetes educator.

[8]  D. Marrero,et al.  A Modified Quality-of-Life Measure for Youths: Psychometric Properties , 1991, The Diabetes educator.

[9]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[10]  S. Johnson Health behavior and health status: concepts, methods, and applications. , 1994, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[11]  Consistency of adherence across regimen demands. , 1989, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[12]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Self-care behaviors and glycemic control in type I diabetes. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  Daniel J. Cox,et al.  Self-Measurement of Blood Glucose: Accuracy of Self-Reported Data and Adherence to Recommended Regimen , 1988, Diabetes Care.

[14]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Regimen Adherence: A Problematic Construct in Diabetes Research , 1985, Diabetes Care.

[15]  C. Kilo,et al.  The role of health beliefs in the regimen adherence and metabolic control of adolescents and adults with diabetes mellitus. , 1987, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  A. La Greca Issues in adherence with pediatric regimens. , 1990, Journal of pediatric psychology.