Clinical Relevance of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement: A Computed Tomographic‐Supported Analysis

Study Design. The location of pedicle screws (n = 244) and the increase in the pedicle diameter were determined by computed tomography after screw removal in 50 patients with 360° lumbar fusions. The neurologic findings were examined before and after surgery. Objectives. To evaluate the correlation between the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and preoperative and postoperative neurologic findings. Summary of Background Data. Incorrect placement of pedicle screws that was detected by computed tomography has been published in several studies. Simultaneous pathologic neurologic deficits are thought to be created by an eccentric screw track. Methods. Two observers controlled the screw tracts and pedicle diameters. The results were compared with preoperative and postoperative neurologic findings. Results. Fifty‐nine percent (144 of 244) of screws were placed centrally in the pedicle. More than half of the eccentric screws (100, 41%; medial 79, 32.4%; lateral 21, 8.6%) penetrated the pedicle wall less than 2 mm (51; 20.9%). In only one patient (0.5%) a radicular irritation was found without objective electrophysiologic correlation when the screw was more than 6 mm medial to the pedicle wall. After screw removal, an insignificant increase in the size of the pedicle diameter in L1‐S1 was noted. Conclusions. Experienced surgeons implant pedicle screws with an accuracy of approximately 80%. The accuracy could be improved by using image‐guided insertion equipment. The neurologic symptoms are rarely influenced by an eccentric pedicle screw tract even if penetration of the pedicle wall is more than 6 mm. The results stress the importance of preoperative planning (pedicle diameter, pedicle angle, screw length) when implanting transpedicular fixators.

[1]  S. Cook,et al.  Roentgenographic measurement of pedicle screw penetration. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  Frank Langlotz,et al.  Image‐Guided Insertion of Transpedicular Screws: A Laboratory Set‐Up , 1995, Spine.

[3]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Spinal Pedicle Fixation: Reliability and Validity of Roentgenogram-Based Assessment and Surgical Factors on Successful Screw Placement , 1988, Spine.

[4]  D. Bradford,et al.  Results of spinal arthrodesis with pedicle screw-plate fixation. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  L. Wiltse,et al.  Anatomic Analysis of Pedicle Cortical and Cancellous Diameter as Related to Screw Size , 1989, Spine.

[6]  F. Mendel,et al.  Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. , 1990, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume.

[7]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo , 1990, Spine.

[8]  P. Pech,et al.  CT analysis of pedicles and screw tracts after implant removal in thoracolumbar fractures. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[9]  R Roy-Camille,et al.  Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  W. Castro,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1996, Spine.

[11]  D O Hancock,et al.  The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia , 1969, Paraplegia.