Management of acute appendicitis: the impact of CT scanning on the bottom line.

BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis continues to be a common general surgical problem. Little is known about whether the contribution to margin has been affected by changes in technology. STUDY DESIGN Patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis from June 2005 to May 2007 were evaluated for demographics, diagnostic and treatment alternatives, and outcomes. Financial outcomes were assessed. Efficiency, including admission to emergency department bed to incision (bed to knife time [BTK]), operative length, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were assessed. RESULTS During the 2 years of the study, there were no differences in demographics, insurance status, case length, diagnostic accuracy, pathology, LOS, or outcomes. Both laparoscopy and CT use increased between the 2 study years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.68, p = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.98-2.89 and OR: 1.83, p = 0.06, CI, 0.98-3.45, respectively). Mean BTK time increased by about 1 hour: 465 minutes versus 521 minutes (p = 0.032; 95% CI, 0.08-1.78) in univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated no difference in BTK time between years (p = 0.136). After controlling for gender, year of operation, and insurance status, obtaining a CT study added 3.5 hours to BTK time (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 2.41-4.45). Women had BTK times 55 minutes longer than men when controlling for similar covariates (p = 0.027; 95% CI, 0.11-1.74). Laparoscopy contributed to shorter mean LOS (-0.78 days, p = 0.04), and gangrenous appendicitis (1.80 days, p < 0.001) and complications (4.23 days, p < 0.001) increased LOS. Mean contribution to margin decreased from $6,347 to $4,295 (p = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS Increasing use of CT scanning in acute appendicitis increases cost of care, decreases contribution to margin, prolongs patient's stay in the emergency department, and delays time to operation.

[1]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 1: Seeking an Explanation , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  H. Ho,et al.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[3]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 2: Technologic Innovation , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  M. Curet,et al.  Institutional variations in the management of patients with acute appendicitis , 2003, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[5]  T. Heimann,et al.  Comparison of open and laparoscopic treatment of acute appendicitis. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[6]  Paul B Ginsburg,et al.  High and rising health care costs. , 2008, The Synthesis project. Research synthesis report.

[7]  D. Lu,et al.  Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  B. Miedema,et al.  Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[9]  T. Pappas Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the standard of care for chronic and acute cholecystitis. , 1991, Annals of medicine.

[10]  K D Mandl,et al.  Effect of Computed Tomography on Patient Management and Costs in Children With Suspected Appendicitis , 1999, Pediatrics.

[11]  B. Daley,et al.  Influence of Preoperative Computed Tomography on Patients Undergoing Appendectomy , 2001, The American surgeon.

[12]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. A new standard of care. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[13]  C. Kalbaugh,et al.  Abdominal CT Scanning in Reproductive-Age Women with Right Lower Quadrant Abdominal Pain: Does Its Use Reduce Negative Appendectomy Rates and Healthcare Costs? , 2007, The American surgeon.

[14]  K.-H. Lin,et al.  Cost analysis of management in acute appendicitis with CT scanning under a hospital global budgeting scheme , 2008, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[15]  Sukru Mehmet Erturk,et al.  Imaging utilization in the management of appendicitis and its impact on hospital charges , 2007, Emergency Radiology.

[16]  R. Novelline,et al.  Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  L. Swanstrom,et al.  Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  M. Sarr CT scan in complicated appendicitis diagnosis: a very costly option. , 2004, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[19]  C. Peck,et al.  The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[20]  E. Paulson,et al.  Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  E. Moore,et al.  Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[22]  M. Nipper,et al.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis: when are they indicated? , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[23]  H. Buhr,et al.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth the cost?]. , 2009, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.