Amplitude spectrum area: Measuring the probability of successful defibrillation as applied to human data

Objective:The objective of our study was to examine the effectiveness of an electrocardiographic predictor, amplitude spectral area (AMSA), for the optimal timing of defibrillation shocks in human victims of cardiac arrest. Based on the spectral characteristics of ventricular fibrillation potentials, we examined the probability of successful conversion to an organized viable rhythm, including the return of spontaneous circulation. The incentive was to predict the likelihood of successful defibrillation and thereby improve outcomes by minimizing interruptions in chest compression and minimizing electrically induced myocardial injury due to repetitive high-current shocks. Design:Observational study on human electrocardiographic recordings during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Setting:Medical research laboratory of a university-affiliated research and educational institute. Patients:Victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Interventions:Iteration of electrocardiographic records, representing lead 2 equivalent recordings on 108 defibrillation attempts with an automated external defibrillator, of 46 victims of cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Measurements and Main Results:Three seconds of ventricular fibrillation, recorded immediately preceding delivery of a shock, were analyzed utilizing the AMSA algorithm. AMSA represents a numerical value based on the sum of the magnitude of the weighted frequency spectrum between 3 and 48 Hz. The greater the AMSA value, the greater was the probability of reversal of ventricular fibrillation. At an AMSA value of >13.0 mV-Hz, successful defibrillation yielded a sensitivity of .91 and a specificity of .94. Conclusion:AMSA predicts the success of electrical defibrillation with high specificity. AMSA therefore serves to minimize interruptions of precordial compression and the myocardial damage caused by delivery of repetitive and ineffective electrical shocks.

[1]  Paul S Addison,et al.  Angular velocity: a new method to improve prediction of ventricular fibrillation duration. , 2004, Resuscitation.

[2]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Ventricular Fibrillation Scaling Exponent Can Guide Timing of Defibrillation and Other Therapies , 2004, Circulation.

[3]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Bispectral Energies within Electrocardiograms During Ventricular Fibrillation are Correlated with Defibrillation Shock Outcome , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Matthew J Reed,et al.  Analysing the ventricular fibrillation waveform. , 2003, Resuscitation.

[5]  P. Steen,et al.  Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[6]  Roger D. White,et al.  Refibrillation, resuscitation and survival in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest victims treated with biphasic automated external defibrillators. , 2002, Resuscitation.

[7]  Wanchun Tang,et al.  Myocardial dysfunction after electrical defibrillation. , 2002, Resuscitation.

[8]  P. Steen,et al.  Effects of Interrupting Precordial Compressions on the Calculated Probability of Defibrillation Success During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2002, Circulation.

[9]  Wanchun Tang,et al.  Predicting the success of defibrillation by electrocardiographic analysis. , 2002, Resuscitation.

[10]  M H Weil,et al.  Optimizing timing of ventricular defibrillation , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[11]  H U Strohmenger,et al.  Analysing ventricular fibrillation ECG-signals and predicting defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation employing N(alpha)-histograms. , 2001, Resuscitation.

[12]  Vincent N. Mosesso,et al.  Scaling Exponent Predicts Defibrillation Success for Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest , 2001, Circulation.

[13]  Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 6: advanced cardiovascular life support: section 4: devices to assist circulation. The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. , 2000, Circulation.

[14]  M. Copass,et al.  Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation , 1999, JAMA.

[15]  M. Weil,et al.  Electrocardiographic prediction of the success of cardiac resuscitation. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[16]  Y. Sato,et al.  High-energy defibrillation increases the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. , 1997, Circulation.

[17]  R. Dzwonczyk,et al.  Signal analysis of the human electrocardiogram during ventricular fibrillation: frequency and amplitude parameters as predictors of successful countershock. , 1996, Annals of emergency medicine.

[18]  M. Copass,et al.  Amplitude of ventricular fibrillation waveform and outcome after cardiac arrest. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  Council , 1954, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).