Complete dictionary online learning for sparse unmixing

Sparse unmixing has been successfully applied to hyperspectral remote sensing imagery, based on an available standard spectral library. However, as the number of hyperspectral remote sensors increases, more and more hyperspectral remote sensing images are requiring analysis without the use of a corresponding standard spectral library. To address this problem, sparse unmixing with a complete dictionary online self-learning technique is proposed in this paper. This paper focuses on complete dictionary, which can tackle the unmixing problem with exactly atoms needed in the dataset and online learning means to process the specific data, or the current single hyperspectral remote sensing imagery, at real time. The proposed method addresses the sparse unmixing problem by considering the physical meaning of atoms in the complete dictionary, as well as a non-negative constraint for the abundance. Compared with the classical dictionary learning approaches in sparse representation theory, the experiments with two simulated hyperspectral datasets and a real dataset confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  Kjersti Engan,et al.  Multi-frame compression: theory and design , 2000, Signal Process..

[2]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Sparse Unmixing of Hyperspectral Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  M. Elad,et al.  $rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[4]  A. Bruckstein,et al.  K-SVD : An Algorithm for Designing of Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2005 .

[5]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Total Variation Spatial Regularization for Sparse Hyperspectral Unmixing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Alternating direction algorithms for constrained sparse regression: Application to hyperspectral unmixing , 2010, 2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[7]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Non-Local Sparse Unmixing for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Imagery , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Marian-Daniel Iordache,et al.  Greedy algorithms for pure pixels identification in hyperspectral unmixing: A multiple-measurement vector viewpoint , 2013, 21st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2013).

[10]  Kjersti Engan,et al.  Method of optimal directions for frame design , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[11]  Michael Elad,et al.  Sparse and Redundant Representations - From Theory to Applications in Signal and Image Processing , 2010 .

[12]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Hyperspectral Subspace Identification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  A Signal Processing Perspective on Hyperspectral Unmixing: Insights from Remote Sensing , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  J. Chanussot,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Analysis and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.