Measuring kinaesthetic sensitivity in typically developing children

This study presents a method to quantify a child’s sensitivity to passive limb motion, which is an important aspect of kinaesthesia not easily examined clinically. Psychophysical detection thresholds to passive forearm motion were determined in a group of 20 typically developing pre‐adolescent children (mean age 12y 6mo, SD 10mo, range 11−13y) and a group of 10 healthy adults (mean age 29y 10mo, SD 10y 7mo, range 18−50y). A newly designed passive motion apparatus was used to measure the time to detection of forearm motion and the errors in determining movement direction. Results showed that limb motion sensitivity became increasingly variable below 0.3°/s in children and adults. In comparison with adults, movement detection times in the pediatric group were increased by between 4% and 108% for the range of tested velocities (0.075−1.35°/s). At 0.075°/s, 5% of the children, but 50% of the adults, made no directional error, indicating that motion perception became unreliable at such low velocity in both groups. The findings demonstrate that sensitivity to passive forearm motion in children should be tested at a range between 0.075 and 0.3°/s. They further suggest that passive motion sensitivity may not be fully developed in pre‐adolescent children.

[1]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Proprioceptive Illusions Induced by Muscle Vibration: Contribution by Muscle Spindles to Perception? , 1972, Science.

[2]  J. Konczak,et al.  The perception of passive motion in Parkinson's disease , 2007, Journal of Neurology.

[3]  J. I. Laszlo,et al.  The Measurement of Kinaesthetic Sensitivity in Children and Adults , 1980, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[4]  H. Sigmundsson,et al.  Perceptual Deficits in Clumsy Children: Inter- and Intra-Modal Matching Approach—A Window into Clumsy Behavior , 2003, Neural plasticity.

[5]  R. Geuze,et al.  Kinaesthetic acuity in adolescent boys: a longitudinal study , 2000, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[6]  C. Hofsten,et al.  The integration of sensory information in the development of precise manual pointing , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  J. P. Pick,et al.  KINAESTHETIC SENSITIVITY AND MOTOR PERFORMANCE OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL CO‐ORDINATION DISORDER , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[8]  J. I. Laszlo,et al.  Kinaesthetic Sensitivity to Passive Movements and its Relationship to Motor Development and Motor Control , 1981, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  T. Smyth Clumsiness in children: a defect of kinaesthetic perception? , 1994, Child: care, health and development.

[10]  F. J. Clark,et al.  Signaling of kinesthetic information by peripheral sensory receptors. , 1982, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  M. Smyth,et al.  Use of proprioception in normal and clumsy children , 1998, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  D. McCloskey,et al.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  K. Connolly,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF KINAESTHETIC SENSITIVITY AND MOTOR PERFORMANCE IN CHILDREN , 1988, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[14]  Measurement of Kinaesthetic Sensitivity , 1986, Developmental medicine and child neurology.