Calculating ecological footprints at the municipal level: what is a reasonable approach for Canada?

No clear ecological footprint calculation strategy is available for small- and mid-sized communities within Canada. By adjusting provincial or national footprint findings using data sets available in the public domain, we develop and test a calculation strategy to estimate municipal ecological footprints. Because the calculation approach is consistent with the Global Footprint Network standardised methodology, it permits meaningful comparisons between communities and with global and national footprint estimates. It offers planners, policy-makers, and community leaders an accessible, straight forward, and cost effective strategy for estimating the ecological footprint at the community and municipal level. The suggested approach is best suited for using the ecological footprint as an awareness and education tool. The large number of limitations associated with calculating the municipal approach and limitations associated with calculating ecological footprints in general at the local level make it an unsuitable tool to inform community planning and policy development.

[1]  Neil Sipe,et al.  Regional sustainability: How useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale? , 2008 .

[2]  Brad R. Ewing,et al.  Living planet report 2008 , 2004 .

[3]  T. Wiedmann,et al.  The Use of Input-Output Analysis in REAP to allocate Ecological Footprints and Material Flows to Final Consumption Categories , 2008 .

[4]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  The ecological footprint of Santiago de Chile , 1998 .

[5]  J. Bergh,et al.  Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’ , 1999 .

[6]  Craig T. Simmons,et al.  The use of Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity Analyses as Sustainability Indicators for Sub- national Geographical Areas: A Recommended Way Forward , 2001 .

[7]  Andrew Flynn,et al.  Reducing Cardiff’s ecological footprint: A resource accounting tool for sustainable consumption , 2005 .

[8]  Gene Bazan Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[9]  C. Vlek,et al.  Measurement and Determinants of Environmentally Significant Consumer Behavior , 2002 .

[10]  Thomas Wiedmann,et al.  Exploring the application of the Ecological Footprint to sustainable consumption policy , 2005 .

[11]  Graham Haughton,et al.  Planning with Ecological Footprints: a sympathetic critique of theory and practice , 2006 .

[12]  Nathan Fiala,et al.  Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science , 2008 .

[13]  M. Fiore,et al.  The reliability of self-reported cigarette consumption in the United States. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[14]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Michael Hennessy,et al.  An Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of Survey Response Data On Household Electricity Conservation , 1985 .

[16]  Joe Ravetz,et al.  Counting Consumption:: CO2 emissions, material flows and ecological footprint of the UK by region and devolved country , 2006 .

[17]  T. Chikritzhs,et al.  Under-reporting of alcohol consumption in household surveys: a comparison of quantity-frequency, graduated-frequency and recent recall. , 2004, Addiction.

[18]  William E. Rees,et al.  Human nature, eco-footprints and environmental injustice , 2008 .

[19]  Great Britain. Foreign Office. Census of population , 1988 .