Critical Design Sensibility in Postcolonial Conditions

For the past decade, social media technologies have acclaimed global successes and altered local cultures. Various uses across the globe not only present peculiar patterns characterized by local cultural and sociotechnical conditions, but also are complicated by the issues of value, identity, power, and hegemony in the postcolonial conditions. Unfortunately postcolonial scholarship had been absent in technology and computing design discourse until lately, and this partially explains why culture is often interpreted narrowly and statically, and structure and its structuring process is mostly ignored in cross-cultural design practices. To address these issues, I argue that cross-cultural design community should foster a critical design sensibility to understand the postcolonial conditions where we are living through so that we could come up with culturally sensitive designs that are not only driven by market revenues but by mindful listening, ethical standards, social justice, and the conscience of “design for social good” as well.

[1]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Multi-lifespan information system design: a research initiative for the hci community , 2010, CHI.

[2]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[3]  S. Harding The postcolonial science and technology studies reader , 2011 .

[4]  D. McMillin International Media Studies , 2007 .

[5]  Hisakazu Hada,et al.  Is that really you?: an approach to assure identity without revealing real-name online , 2009, DIM '09.

[6]  Huatong Sun Toward a Rhetoric of Locale: Localizing Mobile Messaging Technology into Everyday Life , 2009 .

[7]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Postcolonial Computing , 2012 .

[8]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[10]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[11]  P. Dourish,et al.  Postcolonial interculturality , 2009, IWIC '09.

[12]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Interacting with policy in a political world: reflections from the voices from the Rwanda Tribunal project , 2010, INTR.

[13]  Alan Borning,et al.  Next steps for value sensitive design , 2012, CHI.

[14]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI , 2011, CHI.

[15]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[16]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life , 2006 .

[17]  Mathew Gomes Book Review: Cross-Cultural Technology Design: Creating Culture-Sensitive Technology for Local Users , 2014 .

[18]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[19]  Jonathan Donner,et al.  The Rules of Beeping: Exchanging Messages Via Intentional "Missed Calls" on Mobile Phones , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development , 2010, CHI.

[21]  M. Kraidy Hybridity: The Cultural Logic Of Globalization , 2005 .

[22]  Bosah L. Ebo Cyberimperialism?: Global Relations in the New Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[23]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation , 2012, DIS '12.

[24]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  The Three Paradigms of HCI , 2007 .

[25]  Jennifer Daryl Slack,et al.  The theory and method of articulation In cultural studies , 2006 .