Matrix characterization of linear codes with arbitrary Hamming weight hierarchy

The support of an [n, k] linear code C over a finite field $F_{q}$ is the set of all coordinate positions such that at least one codeword has a nonzero entry in each of these coordinate position. The rth generalized Hamming weight $d_{r}$(C), 1 \leq r \leq k, of C is defined as the minimum of the cardinalities of the supports of all [n, r] subcodes of C. The sequence $(d_{1}(C), d_{2}(C),..., d_{k}(C))$ is called the Hamming weight hierarchy (HWH) of C. The HWH, $d_{r}$(C) = n - k + r; r = 1, 2 ,..., k, characterizes maximum distance separable (MDS) codes. Therefore the matrix characterization of MDS codes is also the characterization of codes with the HWH dr(C) = n - k + r; r = 1, 2,..., k. A linear code C with systematic check matrix [I|P], where I is the (n - k) X (n - k) identity matrix and P is a (n - k) X k matrix, is MDS iff every square submatrix of P is nonsingular. In this paper we extend this characterization to linear codes with arbitrary HWH. Using this result, we characterize Near-MDS codes, Near-Near-MDS $(N^{2}-MDS)$ codes and $A^{\mu}-MDS$ codes. The MDS-rank of C is the smallest integer n such that $d_{n+1} = n - k + n + 1$ and the defect vector of C with MDS-rank n is defined as the ordered set ${\mu1(C), \mu2(C), \mu3(C),..., \mu_{n}(C), \mu_{n+1}(C)}$, where $\mu_{i}$(C) = n - k + i - di(C). We call C a dually defective code if the defect vector of the code and its dual are the same. We also discuss matrix characterization of dually defective codes. Further, the codes meeting the generalized Greismer bound are characterized in terms of their generator matrix. The HWH of dually defective codes meeting the generalized Greismer bound are also reported.

[1]  Shu Lin,et al.  On the optimum bit orders with respect to the state complexity of trellis diagrams for binary linear codes , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  Stefan Dodunekov,et al.  On near-MDS codes , 1994 .

[3]  Richard C. Singleton,et al.  Maximum distance q -nary codes , 1964, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Henning Stichtenoth,et al.  Algebraic function fields and codes , 1993, Universitext.

[5]  Lawrence H. Ozarow,et al.  Wire-tap channel II , 1984, AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal.

[6]  Mario A. de Boer,et al.  Almost MDS codes , 1996, Des. Codes Cryptogr..

[7]  V. K. Wei,et al.  On The Generalized Hamming Weights Of Several Classes Of Cyclic Codes , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[8]  B. Sundar Rajan,et al.  A Matrix Characterization of Near - MDS codes , 2006, Ars Comb..

[9]  Ron M. Roth,et al.  On generator matrices of MDS codes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Tor Helleseth,et al.  Generalized Hamming weights of linear codes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Tor Helleseth,et al.  Bounds on the minimum support weights , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Torleiv Kløve,et al.  Almost-MDS and near-MDS codes for error detection , 1997, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Lawrence H. Ozarow,et al.  Wire-tap channel II , 1984, AT&T Bell Lab. Tech. J..

[14]  Stephen B. Wicker,et al.  Reed-Solomon Codes and Their Applications , 1999 .

[15]  M. Tsfasman,et al.  Modular curves, Shimura curves, and Goppa codes, better than Varshamov‐Gilbert bound , 1982 .

[16]  Peter Vanroose Code construction for the noiseless binary switching multiple-access channel , 1988, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.