Expressive tendencies and physiological response to stress.

This study assessed the effects of natural expressive tendencies on physiological response to stress. Male undergraduates were unobtrusively observed while watching a stressor videotape. On the basis of the subjects' facial responsiveness to the film, a group of 23 natural expressers and 22 natural inhibitors were selected and exposed to a threat of shock situation during which heart rate, respiration rate, skin conductance, and facial expressions were monitored. In accord with the discharge model of emotion, natural inhibitors were less facially expressive and more physiologically reactive to the shock threat than were natural expressers. The results also demonstrated that overt expressivity is stable over time and situation. On personality measures, natural expressers scored significantly higher on Mehrabian's empathic tendency scale, thus supporting the efficacy of this paper-and-pencil instrument as a measure of non-verbal responsiveness. The two groups did not differ on measures of self-esteem, introversion--extraversion, or locus of control. The results are discussed in terms of the discharge model as a descriptive metaphor and not a causal theory.

[1]  E. Gellhorn MOTION AND EMOTION: THE ROLE OF PROPRIOCEPTION IN THE PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF THE EMOTIONS. , 1964, Psychological review.

[2]  J. Block A study of affective responsiveness in a lie-detection situation. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  R. Lazarus,et al.  The principle of short-circuiting of threat: further evidence. , 1965, Journal of personality.

[4]  Richard S. Lazarus,et al.  Chapter 14 – Towards a Cognitive Theory of Emotion* , 1970 .

[5]  J. Laird Self-attribution of emotion: the effects of expressive behavior on the quality of emotional experience. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Encoding and decoding of nonverbal affect in humans. , 1970 .

[7]  R. Buck,et al.  Sex, personality, and physiological variables in the communication of affect via facial expression. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  B. T. Engel,et al.  The Current Status of the Concepts of Physiological Response Specificity and Activation , 1974, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.

[9]  P. Ekman Unmasking The Face , 1975 .

[10]  G J LEARMONTH,et al.  Relationships between Palmar Skin Potential during Stress and Personality Variables , 1959, Psychosomatic medicine.

[11]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Effects of nonverbal dissimulation on emotional experience and autonomic arousal. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  R. Buck,et al.  Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.