Absolute calibration method for frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) cloud radars based on corner reflectors

Abstract. This article presents a new cloud radar calibration methodology using solid reference reflectors mounted on masts, developed during two field experiments held in 2018 and 2019 at the Site Instrumental de Recherche par Teledetection Atmospherique (SIRTA) atmospheric observatory, located in Palaiseau, France, in the framework of the Aerosol Clouds Trace gases Research InfraStructure version 2 (ACTRIS-2) research and innovation program. The experimental setup includes 10 and 20 cm triangular trihedral targets installed at the top of 10 and 20 m masts, respectively. The 10 cm target is mounted on a pan-tilt motor at the top of the 10 m mast to precisely align its boresight with the radar beam. Sources of calibration bias and uncertainty are identified and quantified. Specifically, this work assesses the impact of receiver compression, temperature variations inside the radar, frequency-dependent losses in the receiver's intermediate frequency (IF), clutter and experimental setup misalignment. Setup misalignment is a source of bias, previously undocumented in the literature, that can have an impact of the order of tenths of a decibel in calibration retrievals of W-band radars. A detailed analysis enabled the quantification of the importance of each uncertainty source to the final cloud radar calibration uncertainty. The dominant uncertainty source comes from the uncharacterized reference target which reached 2 dB. Additionally, the analysis revealed that our 20 m mast setup with an approximate alignment approach is preferred to the 10 m mast setup with the motor-driven alignment system. The calibration uncertainty associated with signal-to-clutter ratio of the former is 10 times smaller than for the latter. Following the proposed methodology, it is possible to reduce the added contribution from all uncertainty terms, excluding the target characterization, down to 0.4 dB. Therefore, this procedure should enable the achievement of calibration uncertainties under 1 dB when characterized reflectors are available. Cloud radar calibration results are found to be repeatable when comparing results from a total of 18 independent tests. Once calibrated, the cloud radar provides valid reflectivity values when sampling midtropospheric clouds. Thus, we conclude that the method is repeatable and robust, and that the uncertainties are precisely characterized. The method can be implemented under different configurations as long as the proposed principles are respected. It could be extended to reference reflectors held by other lifting devices such as tethered balloons or unmanned aerial vehicles.

[1]  J. Delanoë,et al.  Calibration of a 35-GHz Airborne Cloud Radar: Lessons Learned and Intercomparisons with 94-GHz Cloud Radars , 2018 .

[2]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of ECMWF Winter-Season Cloud Fraction with Radar-Derived Values , 2001 .

[3]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Ice Cloud Content from Radar Reflectivity , 1987 .

[4]  L. R. Koenig,et al.  A Short Course in Cloud Physics , 1979 .

[5]  Gelsomina Pappalardo ACTRIS Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure , 2018 .

[6]  D. Zrnic,et al.  Doppler Radar and Weather Observations , 1984 .

[7]  Emmanouil N. Anagnostou,et al.  The Use of TRMM Precipitation Radar Observations in Determining Ground Radar Calibration Biases , 2001 .

[8]  R. Kaul,et al.  Microwave engineering , 1989, IEEE Potentials.

[9]  T. Manabe,et al.  Millimeter-wave attenuation and delay rates due to fog/cloud conditions , 1989 .

[10]  Neil I. Fox,et al.  The Retrieval of Stratocumulus Cloud Properties by Ground-Based Cloud Radar , 1997 .

[11]  Armin W. Doerry,et al.  Radar Cross Section of Triangular Trihedral Reflector with Extended Bottom Plate , 2009 .

[12]  Thomas Meissner,et al.  The complex dielectric constant of pure and sea water from microwave satellite observations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Henri Sauvageot,et al.  Cloud Liquid Water and Ice Content Retrieval by Multiwavelength Radar , 2003 .

[14]  F. Bosveld,et al.  Ground-Based Observations and Modeling of the Visibility and Radar Reflectivity in a Radiation Fog Layer , 2013 .

[15]  Jorge L. Salazar,et al.  A new approach for in-situ antenna characterization, radome inspection and radar calibration, using an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) , 2017, 2017 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf).

[16]  S. M. Sekelsky,et al.  Parallax Errors and Corrections for Dual-Antenna Millimeter-Wave Cloud Radars , 2002 .

[17]  G. Steeneveld,et al.  Understanding the dissipation of continental fog by analysing the LWP budget using idealized LES and in situ observations , 2019, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[18]  E. O'connor,et al.  Assessment of Cloudsat Reflectivity Measurements and Ice Cloud Properties Using Ground-Based and Airborne Cloud Radar Observations , 2009 .

[19]  J. Verlinde,et al.  CloudSat as a Global Radar Calibrator , 2011 .

[20]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[21]  The Effect of Radar Pulse Length on Cloud Reflectivity Statistics , 2001 .

[22]  S. Bony,et al.  SIRTA, a ground-based atmospheric observatory for cloud and aerosol research , 2005 .

[23]  Jean-Charles Dupont,et al.  BASTA: A 95-GHz FMCW Doppler Radar for Cloud and Fog Studies , 2016 .

[24]  Stéphane Laroche,et al.  Polarimetric Doppler weather radar: principles and applications , 2002 .

[25]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Clouds and Aerosols , 2013 .

[26]  G. Brooker Introduction to Sensors for Ranging and Imaging , 2009 .

[27]  M. Haeffelin,et al.  Stratus–Fog Formation and Dissipation: A 6-Day Case Study , 2012, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[29]  Hans J. Liebe,et al.  MPM—An atmospheric millimeter-wave propagation model , 1989 .

[30]  Evaluation of Fog and Low Stratus Cloud Microphysical Properties Derived from In Situ Sensor, Cloud Radar and SYRSOC Algorithm , 2018 .

[31]  R. Carey Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey , 1978 .

[32]  S. M. Sekelsky,et al.  External Calibration of Millimeter-Wave Atmospheric Radar Systems Using Corner Reflectors and Spheres , 2001 .

[33]  Steven D. Miller,et al.  Rainfall retrieval over the ocean with spaceborne W‐band radar , 2009 .

[34]  Jiapeng Yin,et al.  UAV-Aided Weather Radar Calibration , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[35]  M. Haeffelin,et al.  Radiation in fog: quantification of the impact on fog liquid water based on ground-based remote sensing , 2017 .

[36]  M. Haeffelin,et al.  Absolute Calibration method for FMCW Cloud Radars , 2020 .

[37]  J. Mülmenstädt,et al.  The Radiative Forcing of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Liquid Clouds: Wrestling and Embracing Uncertainty , 2018, Current Climate Change Reports.