Optimizing HER2 assessment in breast cancer: application of automated image analysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ben Vainer | Martin Kristensson | B. Vainer | Henrik Holten-Rossing | Martin Kristensson | Maj-Lis Møller Talman | Henrik Holten-Rossing | Maj-Lis Møller Talman
[1] Jinha M. Park,et al. Diagnostic Evaluation of HER-2 as a Molecular Target: An Assessment of Accuracy and Reproducibility of Laboratory Testing in Large, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trials , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.
[2] John M S Bartlett,et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[3] Søren Nielsen,et al. Digital image analysis of membrane connectivity is a robust measure of HER2 immunostains , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[4] Anne Vincent-Salomon,et al. High inter-observer agreement in immunohistochemical evaluation of HER-2/neu expression in breast cancer: a multicentre GEFPICS study. , 2006, European journal of cancer.
[5] Lynne Dobson,et al. Image analysis as an adjunct to manual HER-2 immunohistochemical review: a diagnostic tool to standardize interpretation , 2010, Histopathology.
[6] Arvydas Laurinavicius,et al. Membrane connectivity estimated by digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry is concordant with visual scoring and fluorescence in situ hybridization results: algorithm evaluation on breast cancer tissue microarrays , 2011, Diagnostic pathology.
[7] J. Winston,et al. HER-2/neu evaluation in breast cancer are we there yet? , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.
[8] Anthony Rhodes,et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[9] Paul J Tadrous,et al. On the concept of objectivity in digital image analysis in pathology , 2010, Pathology.
[10] T. Stephenson,et al. HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[11] W. McGuire,et al. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.
[12] M. Kissin,et al. Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[13] A. Goldhirsch,et al. HER2-negative (1+) breast cancer with unfavorable prognostic features: to FISH or not to FISH? , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[14] L. Goldstein,et al. Determining true HER2 gene status in breast cancers with polysomy by using alternative chromosome 17 reference genes: implications for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[15] Clive R. Taylor,et al. Standardization of Negative Controls in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: Recommendations From the International Ad Hoc Expert Panel , 2014, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.
[16] A. Lænkholm,et al. Implementation of TMA and digitalization in routine diagnostics of breast pathology , 2012, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.
[17] Marios A. Gavrielides,et al. Reproducibility in the automated quantitative assessment of HER2/neu for breast cancer , 2013, Journal of pathology informatics.