Optimizing HER2 assessment in breast cancer: application of automated image analysis

In breast cancer, analysis of HER2 expression is pivotal for treatment decision. This study aimed at comparing digital, automated image analysis with manual reading using the HER2-CONNECT algorithm (Visiopharm) in order to minimize the number of equivocal 2+ scores and the need for reflex fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Consecutive samples from 462 patients were included. Tissue micro arrays (TMAs) were routinely manufactured including two 2 mm cores from each patient, and each core was assessed in order to ensure the presence of invasive carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) was performed with Roche/Ventana’s HER2 ready-to-use kit. TMAs were scanned in a Zeiss Axio Z1 scanner, and one batch analysis of the HER2-CONNECT algorithm including all core samples was run using Visiopharm’s cloud-based software. The automated reading was compared to conventional manual assessment of HER2 protein expression, together with FISH analysis of HER2 gene amplification for borderline (2+) protein expression samples. Compared to FISH analysis, manual assessment of the HER2 protein expression demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.8 % and a specificity of 86.0 % with 14.0 % equivocal samples. With HER2-CONNECT, sensitivity increased to 100 % and specificity to 95.5 % with less than 4.5 % equivocal. Total agreement when comparing HER2-CONNECT with manual IHC assessment supplemented by FISH for borderline (2+) cases was 93.6 %. Application of automated image analysis for HER2 protein expression instead of manual assessment decreases the need for supplementary FISH testing by 68 %. In the routine diagnostic setting, this would have significant impact on cost reduction and turn-around time.

[1]  Jinha M. Park,et al.  Diagnostic Evaluation of HER-2 as a Molecular Target: An Assessment of Accuracy and Reproducibility of Laboratory Testing in Large, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trials , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  Søren Nielsen,et al.  Digital image analysis of membrane connectivity is a robust measure of HER2 immunostains , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  Anne Vincent-Salomon,et al.  High inter-observer agreement in immunohistochemical evaluation of HER-2/neu expression in breast cancer: a multicentre GEFPICS study. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Lynne Dobson,et al.  Image analysis as an adjunct to manual HER-2 immunohistochemical review: a diagnostic tool to standardize interpretation , 2010, Histopathology.

[6]  Arvydas Laurinavicius,et al.  Membrane connectivity estimated by digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry is concordant with visual scoring and fluorescence in situ hybridization results: algorithm evaluation on breast cancer tissue microarrays , 2011, Diagnostic pathology.

[7]  J. Winston,et al.  HER-2/neu evaluation in breast cancer are we there yet? , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  Paul J Tadrous,et al.  On the concept of objectivity in digital image analysis in pathology , 2010, Pathology.

[10]  T. Stephenson,et al.  HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques , 2005, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[11]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[12]  M. Kissin,et al.  Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[13]  A. Goldhirsch,et al.  HER2-negative (1+) breast cancer with unfavorable prognostic features: to FISH or not to FISH? , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Determining true HER2 gene status in breast cancers with polysomy by using alternative chromosome 17 reference genes: implications for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Clive R. Taylor,et al.  Standardization of Negative Controls in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: Recommendations From the International Ad Hoc Expert Panel , 2014, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[16]  A. Lænkholm,et al.  Implementation of TMA and digitalization in routine diagnostics of breast pathology , 2012, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[17]  Marios A. Gavrielides,et al.  Reproducibility in the automated quantitative assessment of HER2/neu for breast cancer , 2013, Journal of pathology informatics.