Reexamining the Circumplex Model of Affect

The circumplex model of affect has been among the most widely studied representations of affect. Despite the considerable evidence cited in support of it, methods typically used to evaluate the model have substantial limitations. In this article, the authors attempt to correct past limitations by using a covariance structure model specifically designed to assess circumplex structure. This model was fit to 47 individual correlation matrices from published data sets. Analyses revealed that model fit was typically acceptable and that opposing affective states usually demonstrated strong negative correlations with one another. However, analyses also indicated substantial variability in both model fit and correlations among opposing affective states and suggested several characteristics of studies that partially accounted for this variability. Detailed examination of the locations of affective states for 10 of the correlation matrices with relatively optimal characteristics provided mixed support for the model.

[1]  W. Wundt,et al.  An Introduction to Psychology , 1912 .

[2]  H. Scholsberg.  A scale for the judgment of facial expressions. , 1941 .

[3]  H. Schlosberg.  A scale for the judgement of facial expressions , 1941 .

[4]  H. Schlosberg.  The description of facial expressions in terms of two dimensions. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[6]  J. Block,et al.  Studies in the phenomenology of emotions. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  E. Borgatta.  Mood, Personality, and Interaction , 1961 .

[8]  R. Abelson,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of facial expressions. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[10]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Structures in the subjective lexicon , 1971 .

[11]  A. Dittmann.  Interpersonal Messages of Emotion , 1972 .

[12]  P. Ekman.  Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. , 1972 .

[13]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[14]  L. E. Bush.  Individual differences multidemensional scaling of adjectives denoting feelings. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  N. Cliff,et al.  Multidimensional comparisons of structures of vocally and facially expressed emotion , 1975 .

[16]  J. Russell,et al.  Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions , 1977 .

[17]  J. Russell.  Evidence of Convergent Validity on the Dimensions of Affect , 1978 .

[18]  E Svensson,et al.  The measurement of mood. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[19]  E. Borgatta,et al.  Research on Aging , 1979 .

[20]  J. Russell,et al.  A Description of the Affective Quality Attributed to Environments , 1980 .

[21]  J. Russell.  A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[22]  James H. Steiger,et al.  The structure in persons' implicit taxonomy of emotions. , 1982 .

[23]  Auke Tellegen,et al.  The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. , 1982 .

[24]  James A. Russell,et al.  Dimensions underlying children's emotion concepts. , 1983 .

[25]  J. Russell.  Pancultural Aspects of the Human Conceptual Organization of Emotions , 1983 .

[26]  J. Russell,et al.  Preschool Children's Interpretation of Facial Expressions of Emotion , 1984 .

[27]  D. Watson,et al.  Cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood: A Japanese replication and a comparison with U.S. findings , 1984 .

[28]  E. Diener,et al.  The independence of positive and negative affect. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  J. Russell,et al.  Further Evidence on Preschoolers' Interpretation of Facial Expressions , 1985 .

[30]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  R. Larsen,et al.  Intensity and frequency: dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J. Russell,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of emotional facial expressions: Similarity from preschoolers to adults. , 1985 .

[33]  E. Howarth,et al.  Patterns of mood change , 1986 .

[34]  Asghar Iran-Nejad,et al.  The relationship in experience between various types of affect , 1986 .

[35]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[36]  J. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive domains of the mood system. , 1988, Journal of personality.

[37]  D. Watson,et al.  The vicissitudes of mood measurement: effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  J. Mayer,et al.  The experience and meta-experience of mood. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  D. R. Heise,et al.  Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[40]  Y. Ben-Porath,et al.  The two-factor model of self-reported mood: a cross-cultural replication. , 1989, Journal of personality assessment.

[41]  K. Bollen.  A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models , 1989 .

[42]  J. Russell,et al.  A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. , 1989 .

[43]  Gregory J. Meyer,et al.  Structural convergence of mood and personality: Evidence for old and new directions. , 1989 .

[44]  R. Thayer.  The biopsychology of mood and arousal , 1989 .

[45]  J. Russell.  Culture and the categorization of emotions. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[47]  Kyle Kercher,et al.  Assessing Subjective Well-Being in the Old-Old , 1992 .

[48]  Michael W. Browne,et al.  Circumplex models for correlation matrices , 1992 .

[49]  R. Larsen,et al.  Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. , 1992 .

[50]  Hans Westmeyer,et al.  The Structuralist program in psychology : foundations and applications , 1992 .

[51]  D. Green,et al.  Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  L. Feldman.  Variations in the Circumplex Structure of Mood , 1995 .

[53]  R. Larsen,et al.  Moods as sources of stimulation: Relationships between personality and desired mood states , 1995 .

[54]  E. Diener,et al.  The personality structure of affect. , 1995 .

[55]  L. Feldman.  Valence Focus and Arousal Focus: Individual Differences in the Structure of Affective Experience , 1995 .

[56]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[57]  L. F. Barrett.  Hedonic tone, perceived arousal, and item desirability: Three components of self-reported mood. , 1996 .

[58]  H. Conte,et al.  Circumplex models of personality and emotions , 1997 .

[59]  Ed Diener,et al.  Affect Intensity: Separating Intensity and Frequency in Repeatedly Measured Affect , 1997 .

[60]  M. Browne,et al.  Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Testing the Circumplex Structure of Data in Personality and Social Psychology , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[61]  J. Russell,et al.  Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. , 1998 .

[62]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[63]  D. Green,et al.  Static, dynamic, and causative bipolarity of affect. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  Peter Salovey,et al.  In What Sense are Positive and Negative Affect Independent? A Reply to Tellegen, Watson, and Clark , 1999 .

[65]  David Watson,et al.  Further Support for a Hierarchical Model of Affect: Reply to Green and Salovey , 1999 .

[66]  J. M. Carroll,et al.  On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[67]  James M. Carroll,et al.  On the Psychometric Principles of Affect , 1999 .

[68]  J. Russell,et al.  Structure of Self-Reported Current Affect: Integration and Beyond , 1999 .

[69]  D. Watson,et al.  On the Dimensional and Hierarchical Structure of Affect , 1999 .

[70]  J. Vaidya,et al.  The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence , 1999 .