Slender Roof Structures - Failure Reviews and a Qualitative Survey of Experienced Structural Engineers

Abstract Many slender roof structures have collapsed due to snow loading and instability. Although accurate stability calculations can be performed using theoretical models, these calculations may not always reflect the behaviour of real structures as a result of the uncertainties relating to e.g. loading, material behaviour, geometry, initial imperfections and the actual boundary conditions of the structure. As a result, the approach to stability design requires subjective decisions by the structural engineer concerning loading and modelling assumptions. This paper investigates the significance of these types of decisions made by structural engineers in designing slender roof structures. This investigation is based on a review of previous failure studies together with a survey of 17 experienced structural engineers. The results of this investigation indicate that most structural failures are a result of human errors; thus, a suitable strategy for avoiding errors is through quality control and design checking. Moreover, a significant discrepancy was observed concerning design assumptions made by the engineers in the study. Some of these assumptions, e.g. a non-conservative choice of the buckling length of a beam, have a significant negative impact to structural safety. It is therefore recommended that the structural engineers involved in the design of a structure have adequate experience and a holistic mindset. Another recommendation is that both drawings and design calculations are thoroughly reviewed before construction. Also, temporary bracing to be used during construction should be included in design. Finally, it is important that the communication between different partners in the design of a structure is satisfying.

[1]  Hassan Mehri.  Bracing of steel bridges during construction; theory, full-scale tests and simulations , 2015 .

[2]  Ana M. Girão Coelho,et al.  Imperfection sensitivity of column instability revisited , 2013 .

[3]  Eva Frühwald Hansson,et al.  Slender steel columns: How they are affected by imperfections and bracing stiffness , 2016 .

[4]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  Reliability of Structures , 2000 .

[5]  Roger Hauser.  Lessons From European Failures , 1979 .

[6]  Miroslav Matousek,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Struktur des Sicherheitsproblems bei Bauwerken , 1976 .

[7]  Denys Breysse.  Forensic engineering and collapse databases , 2012 .

[8]  Sven Thelandersson,et al.  Design of safe timber structures - How can we learn from structural failures in concrete, steel and timber? , 2007 .

[9]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Sven Thelandersson,et al.  Uncertainty caused variability in preliminary structural design of buildings , 2015 .

[11]  Carl-Johan Johansson,et al.  Takras vintrarna 2009/2010 och 2010/2011 : orsaker och förslag till åtgärder , 2011 .

[12]  Martin Fröderberg,et al.  The human factor in structural engineering: A source of uncertainty and reduced structural safety , 2014 .

[13]  Ivar Björnsson,et al.  Holistic approach in engineering design - controlling risks from accidental hazards in bridge design , 2015 .

[14]  Eva Frühwald Hansson,et al.  Analysis of structural failures in timber structures: Typical causes for failure and failure modes , 2011 .

[15]  Roberto Crocetti,et al.  Scaffolding bracing of composite bridges during construction , 2016 .

[16]  Joachim Scheer.  Failed Bridges: Case Studies, Causes and Consequences , 2010 .

[17]  Fabian C. Hadipriono,et al.  Study of recent building failures in the United States , 2003 .

[18]  Kenneth L. Carper,et al.  Design and Construction Failures: Lessons from Forensic Investigations , 1991 .