Swimming speed control and on-board flow sensing of an artificial trout

This paper describes a sensing-actuation coupling of a robotic trout that detects changes of the laminar flow speed using an on-board pressure sensor and adjusts its tail-beat frequency for steady swimming. The caudal fin actuator closely mimics the morphology of a real trout, in particular the geometry, stiffness and stiffness distribution of the body and the caudal fin. We hypothesize that the linear relationship between the tail-beat frequency and speed, well-known and proven to hold for all fish studied so far, also holds for an artificial fish. We validate the hypothesis and use the results to derive a linear control law to adjust the tail-beat frequency to the swimming speed. We use an onboard pressure sensor to detect the flow speed and test the actuation in a controlled hydrodynamic environment in a flow pipe.

[1]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Artificial lateral line with biomimetic neuromasts to emulate fish sensing , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[2]  Theresa Burt de Perera,et al.  Spatial parameters encoded in the spatial map of the blind Mexican cave fish, Astyanax fasciatus , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  G. Krijnen,et al.  Cricket Inspired Flow-Sensor Arrays , 2007, 2007 IEEE Sensors.

[4]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Novel mechatronics design for a robotic fish , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  An Efficient Swimming Machine , 1995 .

[6]  Pablo,et al.  Design of biomimetic compliant devices for locomotion in liquid environments , 2007 .

[7]  Michael Sfakiotakis,et al.  Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion , 1999 .

[8]  Chun Wai Liew,et al.  Go reconfigure: how fish change shape as they swim and evolve. , 2010, Integrative and comparative biology.

[9]  Jack Chen,et al.  Institute of Physics Publishing Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering Design and Fabrication of Artificial Lateral Line Flow Sensors 1. Underwater Flow Sensing , 2022 .

[10]  Paolo Fiorini,et al.  Myometry-driven compliant-body design for underwater propulsion , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  K.M. Lynch,et al.  Mechanics and control of swimming: a review , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[12]  John Muir Kumph Maneuvering of a robotic pike , 2000 .

[13]  Lauder Speed effects on midline kinematics during steady undulatory swimming of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  J. Zweifel,et al.  SWIMMING SPEED, TAIL BEAT FREQUENCY7 TAIL BEAT AMPLITUDE, AND SIZE IN JACK MACKEREL, Trucharzcs symmetricas, AND OTHER FISHES , 1971 .

[15]  C. A. Pell,et al.  Mechanical control of swimming speed: stiffness and axial wave form in undulating fish models , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  P. W. Webb,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SIZE AND SWIMMING SPEED ON LOCOMOTOR KINEMATICS OF RAINBOW TROUT , 1984 .

[17]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Hydrodynamic and Acoustic Field Detection , 1988 .

[18]  Jamie M Anderson,et al.  Maneuvering and Stability Performance of a Robotic Tuna1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[19]  A. M. Sutterlin,et al.  Possible Role of the Posterior Lateral Line in Obstacle Entrainment by Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) , 1975 .

[20]  Julie Goulet,et al.  Object localization through the lateral line system of fish: theory and experiment , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  Nonlinear control methods for planar carangiform robot fish locomotion , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[22]  N. Kato,et al.  Control performance in the horizontal plane of a fish robot with mechanical pectoral fins , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[23]  D. S. B A R R E T T,et al.  Drag reduction in fish-like locomotion , 2022 .

[24]  R. Bainbridge,et al.  The Speed of Swimming of Fish as Related to Size and to the Frequency and Amplitude of the Tail Beat , 1958 .

[25]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Controlling swimming and crawling in a fish robot using a central pattern generator , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[26]  Mchenry,et al.  UNDULATORY SWIMMING: HOW TRAVELING WAVES ARE PRODUCED AND MODULATED IN SUNFISH (LEPOMIS GIBBOSUS) , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Design of a Lateral-Line Sensor for an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle , 2009 .

[28]  R. Cingolani,et al.  Stress-driven AlN cantilever-based flow sensor for fish lateral line system , 2011 .

[29]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Learning from fish: Kinematics and experimental hydrodynamics for roboticists , 2006, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[30]  Robert Bamler,et al.  Hydrodynamic object recognition: when multipoles count. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[31]  S. V. van Netten Hydrodynamic detection by cupulae in a lateral line canal: functional relations between physics and physiology. , 2006, Biological cybernetics.

[32]  Sietse M. van Netten,et al.  Hydrodynamic detection by cupulae in a lateral line canal: functional relations between physics and physiology , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  David Scott Barrett,et al.  Propulsive efficiency of a flexible hull underwater vehicle , 1996 .

[34]  Junzhi Yu,et al.  Development of a biomimetic robotic fish and its control algorithm , 2004, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.