Sources of bias in studies of time to pregnancy.

Among sexually active couples who are not using contraception, there is considerable heterogeneity in fertility, even among those who eventually achieve pregnancy. The number of menstrual cycles required, measured in integer time, is greatly overdispersed compared to the geometric, suggesting that the per cycle probability of conception varies considerably among couples. Some of this variability may reflect the effect of reproductive toxicants on fertility, and studies of time to pregnancy can be useful in identifying such toxic effects. We describe models for analysing time-to-pregnancy data, and discuss seven sources of bias that can lead the reproductive epidemiologist to spurious conclusions. Certain analytic and design strategies can help protect against some of the pitfalls.

[1]  D D Baird,et al.  Pitfalls inherent in retrospective time-to-event studies: the example of time to pregnancy. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  C. Weinberg,et al.  Reduced fertility among women employed as dental assistants exposed to high levels of nitrous oxide. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M. Goldhaber,et al.  The Fetal Life Table Revisited: Spontaneous Abortion Rates in Three Kaiser Permanente Cohorts , 1991, Epidemiology.

[4]  J J Heckman,et al.  Estimating fecundability from data on waiting times to first conception. , 1990, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[5]  J. Boldsen,et al.  Time to pregnancy—a model and its application , 1990, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[6]  M. Joffe.  Feasibility of studying subfertility using retrospective self reports. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  Jerald F. Lawless,et al.  Inference Based on Retrospective Ascertainment: An Analysis of the Data on Transfusion-Related AIDS , 1989 .

[8]  C. Weinberg,et al.  Reduced fecundability in women with prenatal exposure to cigarette smoking. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  C. Weinberg,et al.  CAFFEINATED BEVERAGES AND DECREASED FERTILITY , 1988, The Lancet.

[10]  Clarice R. Weinberg,et al.  Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  D D Baird,et al.  Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  C. Weinberg,et al.  The beta-geometric distribution applied to comparative fecundability studies. , 1986, Biometrics.

[13]  M. Joffe.  Biases in research on reproduction and women's work. , 1985, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  C. Russell.  The business of demographics. , 1984, Population bulletin.

[15]  C. Tietze.  Fertility after discontinuation of intrauterine and oral contraception. , 1968, International journal of fertility.

[16]  W. Brass.  The distribution of births in human populations. , 1958 .

[17]  W. Brass.  The distribution of births in human populations in rural Taiwan , 1958 .

[18]  S Wacholder,et al.  Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .