A novel quantitative proteomics workflow by isobaric terminal labeling.

Quantification by series of b, y fragment ion pairs generated from isobaric-labeled peptides in MS2 spectra has recently been considered an accurate strategy in quantitative proteomics. Here we developed a novel MS2 quantification approach named quantitation by isobaric terminal labeling (QITL) by coupling (18)O labeling with dimethylation. Trypsin-digested peptides were labeled with two (16)O or (18)O atoms at their C-termini in H(2)(16)O or H(2)(18)O. After blocking all ε-amino groups of lysines through guanidination, the N-termini of the peptides were accordingly labeled with formaldehyde-d(2) or formaldehyde. These indistinguishable, isobaric-labeled peptides in MS1 spectra produce b, y fragment ion pairs in the whole mass range of MS2 spectra that can be used for quantification. In this study, the feasibility of QITL was first demonstrated using standard proteins. An accurate and reproducible quantification over a wide dynamic range was achieved. Then, complex rat liver samples were used to verify the applicability of QITL for large-scale quantitative analysis. Finally, QITL was applied to profile the quantitative proteome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and adjacent non-tumor liver tissues. Given its simplicity, low-cost, and accuracy, QITL can be widely applied in biological samples (cell lines, tissues, and body fluids, etc.) for quantitative proteomic research.

[1]  John D. Venable,et al.  Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra , 2004, Nature Methods.

[2]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Index-ion Triggered MS2 Ion Quantification: A Novel Proteomics Approach for Reproducible Detection and Quantification of Targeted Proteins in Complex Mixtures* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[4]  Thomas A Neubert,et al.  Automated Comparative Proteomics Based on Multiplex Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Stable Isotope Labeling * , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[5]  X. Yao,et al.  Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: evaluation of endoprotease Glu-C as the catalytic agent. , 2002, Journal of proteome research.

[6]  Sándor Suhai,et al.  Fragmentation pathways of protonated peptides. , 2005, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[7]  Mark D'Ascenzo,et al.  8‐Plex quantitation of changes in cerebrospinal fluid protein expression in subjects undergoing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Alzheimer's disease , 2007, Proteomics.

[8]  J. Redondo,et al.  A Robust Method for Quantitative High-throughput Analysis of Proteomes by 18O Labeling* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[9]  X. Yao,et al.  Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  Relative quantification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluids by MS/MS using 6-plex isobaric tags. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  G. Glish,et al.  High amplitude short time excitation: A method to form and detect low mass product ions in a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer , 2006, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[13]  Sheng Gu,et al.  Amino acid residue specific stable isotope labeling for quantitative proteomics. , 2002, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[14]  Liang Li,et al.  Differential dimethyl labeling of N-termini of peptides after guanidination for proteome analysis. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  Shu-Hui Chen,et al.  Stable-isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  M. Mann,et al.  Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative , 2005, Nature chemical biology.

[17]  Peng-Yuan Yang,et al.  In vivo termini amino acid labeling for quantitative proteomics. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Á. Moreno,et al.  Quantitative proteomics by 2‐DE, 16O/18O labelling and linear ion trap mass spectrometry analysis of lymph nodes from piglets inoculated by porcine circovirus type 2 , 2011, Proteomics.

[20]  J. Gebler,et al.  Two-dimensional separation of peptides using RP-RP-HPLC system with different pH in first and second separation dimensions. , 2005, Journal of separation science.

[21]  S. Oliver,et al.  Improved matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric analysis of tryptic hydrolysates of proteins following guanidination of lysine-containing peptides. , 2000, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[22]  Bernd Thiede,et al.  Isobaric peptide termini labeling for MS/MS-based quantitative proteomics. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[23]  Z. Wang,et al.  Capn4 overexpression underlies tumor invasion and metastasis after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2009, Hepatology.

[24]  Rong Zeng,et al.  From Proteomic Analysis to Clinical Significance , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[25]  S. Gygi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  F. Biasi,et al.  Prognostic markers and putative therapeutic targets for hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2010, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[27]  P. Manow ‚The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly‘ , 2002 .

[28]  H. Zou,et al.  A fully automated system with online sample loading, isotope dimethyl labeling and multidimensional separation for high-throughput quantitative proteome analysis. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  G. Fu,et al.  Insight into hepatocellular carcinogenesis at transcriptome level by comparing gene expression profiles of hepatocellular carcinoma with those of corresponding noncancerous liver , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Ishtiaq Rehman,et al.  iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: "the good, the bad and the ugly". , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[31]  Bernd Thiede,et al.  Isobaric peptide termini labeling utilizing site-specific N-terminal succinylation. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  Jens M. Rick,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[33]  Reinout Raijmakers,et al.  Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[34]  P. O’Farrell High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. , 1975, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[35]  Robert A. Thompson,et al.  Controlling deuterium isotope effects in comparative proteomics. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[36]  Jin Woo Kim,et al.  EpCAM and alpha-fetoprotein expression defines novel prognostic subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2008, Cancer research.

[37]  A. Emili,et al.  Global quantitative proteomic profiling through 18O-labeling in combination with MS/MS spectra analysis. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.