Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise

There is growing concern that anthropogenic noise could interfere with animal behaviours by masking the perception of acoustic communication signals. To date, however, few experimental studies have tested this general hypothesis. One common source of anthropogenic noise is the sound of roadway traffic. We tested the hypothesis that road traffic noise can mask a female's perception of male signals in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis, by comparing the effects of traffic noise and the background noise of a breeding chorus on female responses to advertisement calls. In this species, advertisement calls are necessary and sufficient to attract females for breeding. Using a phonotaxis assay, we presented females with an advertisement call broadcast at one of nine signal levels (37–85 dB, 6-dB steps) in one of three masking conditions: (1) no masking noise, (2) a noise simulating a moderately dense breeding chorus, or (3) a noise modelled after road traffic noise recorded in two wetlands near major roads. Females showed similar increases in response latency and decreases in orientation towards the target signal in the presence of both the chorus noise and the traffic noise maskers. Moreover, response thresholds were elevated by about 20–25 dB in the presence of both noise maskers compared to the unmasked condition. Our results suggest that realistic levels of traffic noise could place constraints on the active space of the acoustic signals of some animals.

[1]  Ahmad Jamrah,et al.  Evaluation of Traffic Noise Pollution in Amman, Jordan , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[2]  Ulrike Langemann,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Perception and acoustic communication networks , 2005 .

[3]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  Disturbance by traffic of breeding birds: evaluation of the effect and considerations in planning and managing road corridors , 1997, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[4]  N. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[5]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate , 2005 .

[6]  Anna M. Hersperger,et al.  Road Traffic and Nearby Grassland Bird Patterns in a Suburbanizing Landscape , 2002, Environmental management.

[7]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Phonotaxis in Female Frogs and Toads: Execution and Design of Experiments , 1995 .

[9]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Phonotactic responses and selectivity of barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) to chorus sounds , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Wolfgang Babisch,et al.  Traffic Noise and Risk of Myocardial Infarction , 2005, Epidemiology.

[11]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[12]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Hybridization in the Diploid-Tetraploid Treefrogs Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor , 1994 .

[13]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  AVIAN COMMUNICATION IN URBAN NOISE: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VOCAL ADJUSTMENT , 2006 .

[14]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  The Evolution of the amphibian auditory system , 1988 .

[15]  T. Hels,et al.  The effect of road kills on amphibian populations , 2001 .

[16]  Johannes Schul,et al.  Phonotaxis in Hyla versicolor (Anura, Hylidae): the effect of absolute call amplitude , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[18]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[19]  A. Feng,et al.  Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Mario Penna,et al.  Effect of natural and synthetic noise on evoked vocal responses in a frog of the temperate austral forest , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Arthur N Popper,et al.  Noise-induced stress response and hearing loss in goldfish (Carassius auratus) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Effect of Road Traffic on Two Amphibian Species of Differing Vagility , 2001 .

[23]  C. Greene,et al.  Changes to acoustic communication systems in human-altered environments. , 2002, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  F. Rheindt The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? , 2003, Journal für Ornithologie.

[25]  Robert D McCauley,et al.  High intensity anthropogenic sound damages fish ears. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs , 2006, Nature.

[27]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  The effects of traffic on the density of breeding birds in Dutch agricultural grasslands , 1996 .

[28]  Jonathan Gordon,et al.  Controlled exposure experiments to determine the effects of noise on marine mammals , 2003 .

[29]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  P. Warren,et al.  Tits, noise and urban bioacoustics. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  J. Schul,et al.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Wai Ming To,et al.  A multiple regression model for urban traffic noise in Hong Kong. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  T. U. Grafe,et al.  Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  Evy Öhrström,et al.  Sleep disturbances from road traffic noise : A comparison between laboratory and field settings , 2006 .

[35]  K. Wells,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication , 2007 .

[36]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. Ill. Reduction of density in relation to the proximity of main roads , 1995 .

[37]  Franz Huber,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[38]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Chorus dynamics of a neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  T. Halliday,et al.  Calling by male midwife toads stimulates females to maintain reproductive condition , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  P. Warren,et al.  Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Marc J. Mazerolle,et al.  AMPHIBIAN ROAD MORTALITY IN RESPONSE TO NIGHTLY VARIATIONS IN TRAFFIC INTENSITY , 2004 .

[42]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Effect of road traffic on amphibian density , 1995 .

[43]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  A Concentric Analysis of the Impact of Urbanization on the Threatened European Tree Frog in an Agricultural Landscape , 2004 .

[44]  Arthur N. Popper,et al.  Effects of Anthropogenic Sounds on Fishes , 2003 .

[45]  W. E. Wood,et al.  SONG SPARROW (MELOSPIZA MELODIA) SONG VARIES WITH URBAN NOISE , 2006 .

[46]  F. Rheindt The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? , 2003 .

[47]  M. Cardoso,et al.  Hearing loss among workers exposed to road traffic noise in the city of São Paulo in Brazil. , 2005, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[48]  Johannes Schul,et al.  Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  A. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson,et al.  Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness , 2006 .

[50]  R. Dooling,et al.  Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Do female frogs exploit inadvertent social information to locate breeding aggregations , 2007 .

[52]  LORI WOLLERMAN,et al.  Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frogHyla ebraccata , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[54]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  The Effects of Car Traffic on Breeding Bird Populations in Woodland. I. Evidence of Reduced Habitat Quality for Willow Warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) Breeding Close to a Highway , 1994 .

[55]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks , 2005 .

[56]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Recognition and Localization of Acoustic Signals , 2007 .

[57]  A. Foote,et al.  Environment: Whale-call response to masking boat noise , 2004, Nature.

[58]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[59]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[60]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Sound source segregation in grey treefrogs: spatial release from masking by the sound of a chorus , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[61]  M. Mazerolle,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF AMPHIBIANS ON THE ROAD IN RESPONSE TO CAR TRAFFIC , 2005 .

[62]  John R. Potter,et al.  A review of the effects of seismic surveys on marine mammals , 2003 .

[63]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics , 1995, BioMethods.

[64]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.

[65]  G. Ellis,et al.  Behavioural reactions of free-ranging porpoises and seals to the noise of a simulated 2 MW windpower generator , 2003 .

[66]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Selective phonotaxis by male wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) to the sound of a chorus , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[67]  R. Wiley,et al.  Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[68]  M. Pescador,et al.  Effects of traffic noise on paserine populations in Mediterranean wooded pastures , 2004 .