Performance of Management Strategies With Class I Recommendations Among Patients Hospitalized With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in China.

Importance Despite advances in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), little is known about how this evolving knowledge is applied in current clinical practice in China. Objective To evaluate hospital performance and temporal trends in the management of STEMI. Design, Setting, and Participants This study used data from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome Project, a nationwide quality improvement registry, in collaboration with the American Heart Association and the Chinese Society of Cardiology. Participants included patients with STEMI admitted to 143 tertiary hospitals across China from November 2014 to July 2019, and data were analyzed from November 2020 to December 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Levels, hospital-level variations, and trends for utilization rates of the 9 management strategies with Class I recommendations in Chinese and US guidelines. Results A total of 57 560 hospitalizations with STEMI were included. Overall, 20.0% of patients received all the care according to the 9 guideline-recommended strategies. The performance rate of quality measures was low for reperfusion therapy (61.0%, 35 115/57 560 patients), β-blocker at discharge (68.3%, 37 750/55 285 patients), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker at discharge (55.1%, 2524/4578 patients), and smoking cessation counseling (36.5%, 9586/26 265 patients) among those who were eligible. Of 25 563 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 66.8% underwent this procedure within 90 minutes of hospital arrival. Of 1128 patients who underwent fibrinolysis therapy, 253 (22.4%) underwent this treatment within 30 minutes of hospital arrival. Measures with high performance rates included receipt of dual antiplatelet therapy within 24 hours (95.5%, 54 263/56 848 patients) and at discharge (91.8%, 51 452/56 019 patients) and receipt of statin at discharge (93.0%, 52 214/56 141 patients) for those eligible. There was significant variation between hospitals in all-or-none score (ranging from 0 to 61.9%) and performance of individual measures. The quality of care improved during the study period, especially for reperfusion therapy, primary PCI within the first 90 minutes of hospital arrival, and smoking cessation counseling. Conclusions and Relevance The quality of care for patients hospitalized with STEMI does not meet guideline-recommended strategies in China, with only 1 in 5 patients receiving all the care according to the 9 guideline-recommended strategies. Large disparities in the quality of care exist across hospitals.

[1]  H. Thiele,et al.  2020 Update of the quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care: the study group for quality indicators from the ACVC and the NSTE-ACS guideline group. , 2021, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[2]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Geographic Variation in Process and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in China From 2001 to 2015 , 2020, JAMA network open.

[3]  M. Sabatine,et al.  Association of Hospital-Level Differences in Care With Outcomes Among Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in China , 2020, JAMA network open.

[4]  C. Murray,et al.  Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , 2019, The Lancet.

[5]  Sidney C. Smith,et al.  Sex Differences in In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Findings From the CCC Project , 2019, Circulation.

[6]  E. Peterson,et al.  Hospital Variation in Adherence Rates to Secondary Prevention Medications and the Implications on Quality , 2018, Circulation.

[7]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Acute Myocardial Infarction: Changes in Patient Characteristics, Management, and 6-Month Outcomes Over a Period of 20 Years in the FAST-MI Program (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) 1995 to 2015 , 2017, Circulation.

[8]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[9]  J. Messenger,et al.  Trends in U.S. Cardiovascular Care: 2016 Report From 4 ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registries. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Sidney C. Smith,et al.  Rationale and design of the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project: A national effort to prompt quality enhancement for acute coronary syndrome. , 2016, American heart journal.

[11]  M. Sabatine,et al.  The China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry: A national long-term registry-research-education integrated platform for exploring acute myocardial infarction in China. , 2016, American heart journal.

[12]  S. Windecker,et al.  Temporal trends in the treatment and outcomes of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. , 2016, European heart journal.

[13]  R. Swaminathan,et al.  Hospital length of stay and clinical outcomes in older STEMI patients after primary PCI: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011 (the China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study): a retrospective analysis of hospital data , 2015, The Lancet.

[15]  [Guideline on the diagnosis and therapy of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction]. , 2015, Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi.

[16]  J. Mega,et al.  Expert consensus document: World Heart Federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI , 2014, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[17]  I. Ranasinghe,et al.  System Barriers to the Evidence-Based Care of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in China: Qualitative Analysis , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[18]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Rapid health transition in China, 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2013, The Lancet.

[19]  Jane A. Linderbaum,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Comparison of Composite Measure Methodologies for Rewarding Quality of Care: An Analysis From the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[21]  K. Fox,et al.  Reperfusion strategy in Europe: temporal trends in performance measures for reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2010, European heart journal.