Unilateral damage to the right cerebral hemisphere disrupts the apprehension of whole faces and their component parts

Although most cases of acquired prosopagnosia are accompanied by bilateral brain lesions, a number also arise following right unilateral lesions. The prevailing consensus is that right hemisphere damage disrupts the configural apprehension of faces, which in turn forces a reliance on part-based processing. Here we describe a patient who following right hemisphere damage is not only unable to apprehend the configural aspects of faces, but is also unable to apprehend their component parts when these are presented within a whole, upright face. Intriguingly, the patient is able to apprehend face parts when these are presented in isolation, within inverted faces, or in unfamiliar, scrambled arrangements. Furthermore, the patient can make use of configural information to detect local changes in non-face stimuli. The findings uncover a hitherto unreported form of impairment following right unilateral damage, and raise questions about the role of the left hemisphere in processing local information.

[1]  Maryse Lassonde,et al.  Self‐face processing in a callosotomy patient , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[3]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[4]  J. C. Meadows The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia , 1974, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  B. Gelder,et al.  Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Face context interferes with local part processing in a prosopagnosic patient , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[8]  E. Renzi Current Issues on Prosopagnosia , 1986 .

[9]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[11]  B. de Gelder,et al.  Configural face processes in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia: evidence for two separate face systems? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[12]  E. Renzi,et al.  Apperceptive and Associative Forms of Prosopagnosia , 1991, Cortex.

[13]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Adrian Danek,et al.  Prosopagnosia after unilateral right cerebral infarction , 2002, Journal of Neurology.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  H. Duvernoy,et al.  The Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy with MRI, and Blood Supply , 1999 .

[17]  Philip C. Ko,et al.  Impaired search for orientation but not color in hemi-spatial neglect , 2008, Cortex.

[18]  Joachim Bodamer,et al.  Die Prosop-Agnosie , 2004, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[19]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Inversion superiority in visual agnosia may be common to a variety of orientation polarised objects besides faces , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[21]  E. Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: a clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of acquired prosopagnosia , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  B. de Gelder,et al.  Beyond localisation: a dynamical dual route account of face recognition. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[24]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[25]  [The problem of agnosia of physiognomy]. , 1952, L'Encephale.

[26]  G. Assal [Regression of physiognomy recognition disorders and topographic memory disorders in a patient operated on for intracerebral, right parieto-temporal hematoma]. , 1969, Revue neurologique.

[27]  M D'Esposito,et al.  Assessment of neglect reveals dissociable behavioral but not neuroanatomical subtypes , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[28]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Configural Coding, Expertise, and the Right Hemisphere Advantage for Face Recognition , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[30]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  L. Robertson,et al.  Crossing the midline: reducing attentional deficits via interhemispheric interactions , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  B. Gelder,et al.  Impaired face recognition does not preclude intact whole face perception , 2002 .

[34]  F Michel,et al.  [Prosopagnosia without hemianopsia after unilateral right occipitotemporal lesion]. , 1986, Revue neurologique.

[35]  Jon Driver,et al.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect , 1992, Nature.

[36]  T Landis,et al.  Prosopagnosia and agnosia for noncanonical views. An autopsied case. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  D. Delis,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  H. Braune,et al.  Impairment of facial recognition in patients with right cerebral infarcts quantified by computer aided "morphing". , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[39]  A. Young,et al.  Aspects of face processing , 1986 .

[40]  Nick Donnelly,et al.  The mental representations of faces and houses: Issues concerning parts and wholes , 1999 .

[41]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[42]  Mitsuru Kawamura,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Clinical and Anatomical Study of Four Patients , 1995, Cortex.

[43]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[44]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  J. Barton Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[46]  J. Barton,et al.  Impaired configurational processing in a case of progressive prosopagnosia associated with predominant right temporal lobe atrophy. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[48]  T Yamamoto,et al.  Selective impairment of facial recognition due to a haematoma restricted to the right fusiform and lateral occipital region , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[49]  Philip C. Ko,et al.  Improvement of a face perception deficit via subsensory galvanic vestibular stimulation , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[50]  J B Hellige,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry for visual information processing. , 1996, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[51]  O. Koenig,et al.  Separable Mechanisms in Face Processing: Evidence from Hemispheric Specialization , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.