Conceptions of e-learning and professional development for e-learning held by tertiary educators in New Zealand

The conceptions an individual holds about a phenomenon can influence and determine associated behaviours and perspectives. Consequently, they have a bearing upon how learning about a phenomenon is undertaken and how that phenomenon is experienced and applied in context. A phenomenographic research approach was used to gather the expressed experiences of e-learning and professional development for e-learning held by teachers and support staff from institutions across New Zealand. Five conceptions of e-learning (as tool and equipment; as a facilitator of interaction; as learning; as a reduction in distance; and as a collaborative enterprise) and four conceptions of professional development for e-learning (as training; as opening up possibilities; as collaboration; and as relevant and purposeful) were discovered. In this report, we discuss the conceptions, and show how they are interrelated through outcome space. Implications for the professional development of tertiary teachers and teaching support staff are outlined. The study provides some insights for individuals, institutions and those responsible for planning and implementing professional development programmes to help them to support the development and progress of e-learning in appropriate and rewarding directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Patrizia Ghislandi,et al.  e-university: a cross-case study in four Italian universities , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  D. Kember A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[3]  Maggie McPherson,et al.  Editorial introduction: BJET special issue on best practice or situated action: the organization of technology enhanced learning , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Keith Trigwell,et al.  Phenomenography: An Approach to Research into Geography Education , 2006 .

[5]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Global picture, local lessons: E-learning policy and accessibility , 2006 .

[6]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  Flying not flapping : a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions , 2005 .

[7]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods , 2005 .

[8]  Liz Beaty The Professional Development of Teachers in Higher Education: Structures, Methods and Responsibilities , 1998 .

[9]  Mats Danielson,et al.  Exploring the e-Learning State of Art , 2008 .

[10]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Understanding Teachers' Self-Sustaining, Generative Change in the Context of Professional Development. , 1998 .

[11]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Variation in the Experience of Leadership of Teaching in Higher Education , 2003 .

[12]  Maggie McPherson,et al.  Action research in continuing professional distance education , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[14]  Ference Marton,et al.  Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality , 1986 .

[15]  T. Guskey Staff Development and Teacher Change. , 1985 .

[16]  Hugh Davis,et al.  Editorial introduction: BJET special issue on critical success factors in institutional change , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Ference Marton,et al.  Towards a Pedagogy of Content , 1989 .

[18]  Darien E. Rossiter,et al.  Whither e-learning? Conceptions of change and innovation in higher education , 2007 .

[19]  Muain H. Jamlan Faculty Opinions Towards Introducing e-learning at the University of Bahrain , 2004 .

[20]  Wj Rosenberg What’s Needed for E-learning to Take Off? Designing a Suitable National and Institutional Policy Runway , 2007 .

[21]  Robyn Smyth,et al.  Concepts of change: enhancing the practice of academic staff development in higher education , 2003 .

[22]  Barbara L. Stewart,et al.  Case study: collaborative creation of an on‐line degree program , 2006 .