Spontaneous and automatic processing of magnitude and parity information of Arabic digits: A frequency-tagging EEG study

Arabic digits (1-9) are everywhere in our daily lives. These symbols convey various semantic information, and numerate adults can easily extract from them several numerical features such as magnitude and parity. Nonetheless, since most studies used active processing tasks to assess these properties, it remains unclear whether and to what degree the access to magnitude and especially to parity is automatic. Here we investigated with EEG whether spontaneous processing of magnitude or parity can be recorded in a frequency-tagging approach, in which participants are passively stimulated by fast visual sequences of Arabic digits. We assessed automatic magnitude processing by presenting a stream of frequent small digit numbers mixed with deviant large digits (and the reverse) with a sinusoidal contrast modulation at the frequency of 10 Hz. We used the same paradigm to investigate numerical parity processing, contrasting odd digits to even digits. We found significant brain responses at the frequency of the fluctuating change and its harmonics, recorded on electrodes encompassing right occipitoparietal regions, in both conditions. Our findings indicate that both magnitude and parity are spontaneously and unintentionally extracted from Arabic digits, which supports that they are salient semantic features deeply associated to digit symbols in long-term memory.

[1]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[2]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Understanding individual face discrimination by means of fast periodic visual stimulation , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  B. Rossion,et al.  Supra-additive contribution of shape and surface information to individual face discrimination as revealed by fast periodic visual stimulation. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[4]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Chapter 12 Cognitive Number Processing: An Encoding-Complex Perspective , 1992 .

[5]  L E Krueger,et al.  Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in sum verification , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[6]  E. M. Duncan,et al.  Isolating the effects of symbolic distance, and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factors analysis , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[7]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[8]  André Mouraux,et al.  Fast periodic visual stimulation to study tool-selective processing in the human brain , 2018, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  The Child's Representation of Number: A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis. , 1983 .

[10]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: a study of developmental dyscalculia. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[11]  Yukari Okamoto,et al.  First graders' cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value: Cross-national comparisons: France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. , 1993 .

[12]  M. Sugishita,et al.  Isolated acalculia due to left parietal lesion. , 1994, Archives of neurology.

[13]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  B. Rossion,et al.  The effect of parametric stimulus size variation on individual face discrimination indexed by fast periodic visual stimulation , 2014, BMC Neuroscience.

[15]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Visual field asymmetries in numerical size comparisons of digits, words, and signs , 1989, Brain and Language.

[16]  Valérie Goffaux,et al.  Shifts of spatial attention cued by irrelevant numbers: Electrophysiological evidence from a target discrimination task , 2015 .

[17]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Development of spatial representation of numbers: a study of the SNARC effect in Chinese children. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Virtual Dyscalculia Induced by Parietal-Lobe TMS Impairs Automatic Magnitude Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[20]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[21]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[22]  Amy E Booth Conceptually coherent categories support label-based inductive generalization in preschoolers. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task? , 2001, Psychological research.

[24]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  A robust index of lexical representation in the left occipito-temporal cortex as evidenced by EEG responses to fast periodic visual stimulation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Wim Fias,et al.  Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  W. Fias,et al.  How Does Working Memory Enable Number-Induced Spatial Biases? , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[27]  A. Norcia,et al.  An objective index of individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex by means of fast periodic oddball stimulation , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  B. Rossion,et al.  The non-linear development of the right hemispheric specialization for human face perception , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Common and segregated neural pathways for the processing of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude: An fMRI study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[30]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  A rapid, objective and implicit measure of visual quantity discrimination , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Dale J Cohen,et al.  Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  L E Krueger,et al.  Why 2×2=5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in product verification , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[34]  G. Denes,et al.  A specific deficit for numbers in a case of dense acalculia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[36]  V. Csépe,et al.  The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[37]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Uncovering the neural magnitude and spatio-temporal dynamics of natural image categorization in a fast visual stream , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  R. Goebel,et al.  Attentional shifts induced by uninformative number symbols modulate neural activity in human occipital cortex , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Lisa K Fazio,et al.  Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[40]  C. Clifford,et al.  Adaptation to vergent and averted eye gaze. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[41]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[42]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Is 2+2=4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations , 2011, NeuroImage.

[43]  J. A. Pruszynski,et al.  Neural correlates , 2023 .

[44]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information , 1992 .

[45]  A. Henik,et al.  The contribution of fish studies to the “number sense” debate , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral Pathways for Calculation: Double Dissociation between Rote Verbal and Quantitative Knowledge of Arithmetic , 1997, Cortex.

[47]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task , 2009, Cognition.

[48]  H. Nuerk,et al.  A Mental Odd-Even Continuum Account: Some Numbers May Be “More Odd” Than Others and Some Numbers May Be “More Even” Than Others , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[49]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations , 2011, Cognition.

[50]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[51]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[52]  P. Lemaire,et al.  Age-related differences in automatic stimulus-response associations: Insights from young and older adults’ parity judgments , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  The role of the left intraparietal sulcus in the relationship between symbolic number processing and children's arithmetic competence , 2012, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  M. Fayol,et al.  When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: The example of the odd-even effect on product verification , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[55]  H. Nuerk,et al.  Automatic place-value activation in magnitude-irrelevant parity judgement , 2019, Psychological research.

[56]  C. Schiltz,et al.  Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[57]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Heterogeneous Nature of Number–Space Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[58]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults , 2005, Neuroreport.

[59]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[60]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[61]  Yi-Fang Hsu,et al.  The time course of symbolic number adaptation: Oscillatory EEG activity and event-related potential analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[62]  Jonathan Evans Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[63]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases , 2001, Neurology.

[65]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Left cortical specialization for visual letter strings predicts rudimentary knowledge of letter-sound association in preschoolers , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  M. Posner,et al.  Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  Daniel Algom,et al.  Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: attention preempts automaticity. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[68]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Imaging unconscious semantic priming , 1998, Nature.

[69]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Differential Contributions of the Left and Right Inferior Parietal Lobules to Number Processing , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  K Moeller,et al.  Early place-value understanding as a precursor for later arithmetic performance--a longitudinal study on numerical development. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[71]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing , 1995 .

[72]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[73]  L Girelli,et al.  The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[74]  W. Fias,et al.  Semantic Influences on Feature-Based Attention Due to Overlap of Neural Circuits , 2002, Cortex.

[75]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .

[76]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[77]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[78]  Jonathan Evans On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning , 2007 .

[79]  Charles Tijus,et al.  Young children’s mapping between arrays, number words, and digits , 2013, Cognition.

[80]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[81]  Derek Besner,et al.  Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[82]  Nicolas Costes,et al.  Task-independent semantic activation for numbers and animals. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[83]  François Jouen,et al.  Do young children acquire number words through subitizing or counting , 2004 .

[84]  Arava Y. Kallai,et al.  The place-value of a digit in multi-digit numbers is processed automatically. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[85]  K. Miller Chapter 1 What A Number is: Mathematical Foundations and Developing Number Concepts , 1992 .

[86]  Christine Schiltz,et al.  Lateralized Neural Responses to Letters and Digits in First Graders , 2019, Child development.

[87]  Wim Fias,et al.  The temporary nature of number-space interactions. , 2016, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[88]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[89]  Nina Bien,et al.  Automatic and Intentional Number Processing Both Rely on Intact Right Parietal Cortex: A Combined fMRI and Neuronavigated TMS Study , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[90]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[91]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Processing numerosity, length and duration in a three-dimensional Stroop-like task: towards a gradient of processing automaticity? , 2013, Psychological research.

[92]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Automatic comparisons of artificial digits never compared: learning linear ordering relations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[93]  W. Gevers,et al.  The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[94]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  Automaticity in Processing Ordinal Information , 2004 .

[95]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[96]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[97]  T. Surrey,et al.  Complementary activities of TPX2 and chTOG constitute an efficient importin-regulated microtubule nucleation module , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[98]  Mauro PESENTI,et al.  Neuroanatomical substrates of Arabic number processing, numerical comparison and simple addition: A PET study. , 1998, NeuroImage.

[99]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Storage and retrieval of addition facts: The role of number comparison , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[100]  Freya Acar,et al.  A Working Memory Account of the Interaction between Numbers and Spatial Attention , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.