A major locus controls a biologically active pheromone component in Heliconius melpomene
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Rastas | K. Byers | C. Jiggins | S. Schulz | R. Merrill | W. O. McMillan | Y. F. Chan | I. Warren | Sylvia F Garza | M. Kučka | K. Darragh | Jamie Musgrove | Diana Abondano Almeida | Sylvia F. Garza | K. J. Byers | W. McMillan
[1] K. Haynes. 6. Genetic Control of Moth Sex Pheromone Signal and Response , 2019 .
[2] W. Conner,et al. 12. Male Pheromones in Moths: Reproductive Isolation, Sexy Sons, and Good Genes , 2019 .
[3] K. M. Kozak,et al. Species specificity and intraspecific variation in the chemical profiles of Heliconius butterflies across a large geographic range , 2019, bioRxiv.
[4] B. Yandell,et al. R/qtl2: Software for Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci with High-Dimensional Data and Multiparent Populations , 2018, Genetics.
[5] Yongjun Du,et al. Minor Components Play an Important Role in Interspecific Recognition of Insects: A Basis to Pheromone Based Electronic Monitoring Tools for Rice Pests , 2018, Insects.
[6] Pjotr Prins,et al. R/qtl2: Software for Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci with High-Dimensional Data and Multiparent Populations , 2018, Genetics.
[7] V. Ruta,et al. Evolution of a central neural circuit underlies Drosophila mate preferences , 2018, Nature.
[8] C. Jiggins,et al. Male pheromone composition depends on larval but not adult diet in Heliconius melpomene , 2018, bioRxiv.
[9] Simon H. Martin,et al. Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior , 2018, bioRxiv.
[10] Thomas L. Turner,et al. Male mate choice via cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones drives reproductive isolation between Drosophila species , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[11] Pessoa Pinharanda,et al. The genomic basis of species barriers in Heliconius butterflies , 2017 .
[12] Pasi Rastas,et al. Lep-MAP3: robust linkage mapping even for low-coverage whole genome sequencing data , 2017, Bioinform..
[13] K. Dasmahapatra,et al. The Scent Chemistry of Heliconius Wing Androconia , 2017, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[14] Richard Durbin,et al. No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric Heliconius species barrier by chromosomal inversions , 2017, Evolution letters.
[15] C. Jiggins,et al. Male sex pheromone components in Heliconius butterflies released by the androconia affect female choice , 2017, bioRxiv.
[16] R. Merrill,et al. Divergence in brain composition during the early stages of ecological specialization in Heliconius butterflies , 2017, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[17] G. Lamas,et al. The Ecology and Evolution of Heliconius Butterflies , 2017 .
[18] Simon H. Martin,et al. Complex modular architecture around a simple toolkit of wing pattern genes. , 2017, Nature ecology & evolution.
[19] J. Feder,et al. Sensory specificity and speciation: a potential neuronal pathway for host fruit odour discrimination in Rhagoletis pomonella , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[20] Manuel Koller,et al. robustlmm : An R Package for Robust Estimation of Linear Mixed-Effects Models , 2016 .
[21] P. Andolfatto,et al. Population differences in olfaction accompany host shift in Drosophila mojavensis , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[22] M. Blaxter,et al. Lepbase: the Lepidopteran genome database , 2016, bioRxiv.
[23] D. Heckel,et al. The Genetic Basis of Pheromone Evolution in Moths. , 2016, Annual review of entomology.
[24] A. Borg-Karlson,et al. It's All in the Mix: Blend-Specific Behavioral Response to a Sexual Pheromone in a Butterfly , 2016, Front. Physiol..
[25] L. Vaníčková,et al. Identification and field and laboratory tests of the sex pheromone of Cerconota anonella Sepp. (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) , 2016 .
[26] C. Löfstedt,et al. 4. Evolutionary Patterns of Pheromone Diversity in Lepidoptera , 2016 .
[27] M. Joron,et al. Beyond magic traits: Multimodal mating cues in Heliconius butterflies , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[28] J. Yew,et al. Insect pheromones: An overview of function, form, and discovery. , 2015, Progress in lipid research.
[29] Åsa K. Björklund,et al. Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects , 2014, Genome research.
[30] B. Hansson,et al. Shifts in sensory neuron identity parallel differences in pheromone preference in the European corn borer , 2014, Front. Ecol. Evol..
[31] J. Gershenzon,et al. Little peaks with big effects: establishing the role of minor plant volatiles in plant-insect interactions. , 2014, Plant, cell & environment.
[32] E. Bermingham,et al. Phylogeography of Heliconius cydno and its closest relatives: disentangling their origin and diversification , 2014, Molecular ecology.
[33] Jean-Marc Lassance,et al. Sex pheromone biosynthetic pathways are conserved between moths and the butterfly Bicyclus anynana , 2014, Nature Communications.
[34] James Mallet,et al. Multilocus Species Trees Show the Recent Adaptive Radiation of the Mimetic Heliconius Butterflies , 2014, bioRxiv.
[35] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[36] Simon H. Martin,et al. Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies , 2013, Genome research.
[37] S. Rollmann,et al. Divergence in Olfactory Host Plant Preference in D. mojavensis in Response to Cactus Host Use , 2013, PloS one.
[38] Heng Li. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM , 2013, 1303.3997.
[39] S. Via. Divergence hitchhiking and the spread of genomic isolation during ecological speciation-with-gene-flow , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[40] R. Butlin,et al. A framework for comparing processes of speciation in the presence of gene flow , 2011, Molecular ecology.
[41] R. Durbin,et al. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. , 2011, Nature.
[42] T. Ando,et al. Analyses of lepidopteran sex pheromones by mass spectrometry , 2011 .
[43] D. Suckling,et al. New Sex Pheromone Blend for the Lightbrown Apple Moth, Epiphyas postvittana , 2011, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[44] John Fox,et al. Robust Regression in R An Appendix to An R Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition , 2011 .
[45] William N. Venables,et al. Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .
[46] Sanford Weisberg,et al. An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .
[47] M. Ryan,et al. Sexually dimorphic sensory gating drives behavioral differences in túngara frogs , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[48] R. Peakall,et al. Pollinator specificity, floral odour chemistry and the phylogeny of Australian sexually deceptive Chiloglottis orchids: implications for pollinator-driven speciation. , 2010, The New phytologist.
[49] M. Stengl. Pheromone Transduction in Moths , 2010, Front. Cell. Neurosci..
[50] C. Jiggins,et al. Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[51] Erik Hedenström,et al. Allelic variation in a fatty-acyl reductase gene causes divergence in moth sex pheromones , 2010, Nature.
[52] A. M. Araújo,et al. Courtship behavior of Heliconius erato phyllis (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) towards virgin and mated females: conflict between attraction and repulsion signals? , 2010, Journal of Ethology.
[53] E. Dopman,et al. COMPONENTS OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN NORTH AMERICAN PHEROMONE STRAINS OF THE EUROPEAN CORN BORER , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[54] J. V. van Loon,et al. Aphrodisiac Pheromones from the Wings of the Small Cabbage White and Large Cabbage White Butterflies, Pieris rapae and Pieris brassicae , 2009, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[55] R. Butlin,et al. On the scent of speciation: the chemosensory system and its role in premating isolation , 2009, Heredity.
[56] Jean-Marc Lassance,et al. Concerted evolution of male and female display traits in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis , 2009, BMC Biology.
[57] M. Ryan,et al. Candidate neural locus for sex differences in reproductive decisions , 2008, Biology Letters.
[58] B. Hansson,et al. Reversed functional topology in the antennal lobe of the male European corn borer , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[59] P. Brakefield,et al. The Male Sex Pheromone of the Butterfly Bicyclus anynana: Towards an Evolutionary Analysis , 2008, PloS one.
[60] M. Elgar,et al. The evolution of pheromone diversity. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[61] E. Dopman,et al. Molecular Differentiation at Nuclear Loci in French Host Races of the European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) , 2007, Genetics.
[62] Ziheng Yang. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.
[63] Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson,et al. Male sex pheromone release and female mate choice in a butterfly , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[64] H. Fadamiro,et al. Behavioral and Electroantennogram Responses of Phorid fly Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera: Phoridae) to Red Imported Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta Odor and Trail Pheromone , 2007, Journal of Insect Behavior.
[65] D. Kemp,et al. Multimodal signalling: structural ultraviolet reflectance predicts male mating success better than pheromones in the butterfly Colias eurytheme L. (Pieridae) , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[66] G. Turner,et al. Female preference for conspecific males based on olfactory cues in a Lake Malawi cichlid fish , 2005, Biology Letters.
[67] C. Kim,et al. Male sex pheromone of a giant danaine butterfly,Idea leuconoe , 1996, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[68] Y. Chow,et al. Isolation, identification, and synthesis of sex pheromone components of female tea cluster caterpillar,Andraca bipunctata walker (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) in Taiwan , 1996, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[69] D. J. Chamberlain,et al. Components of female sex pheromone of spotted bollworm,Earias vittella F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Identification and field evaluation in Pakistan , 1988, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[70] C. Wysocki,et al. Facts, fallacies, fears, and frustrations with human pheromones. , 2004, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.
[71] A. Borg-Karlson,et al. Antiaphrodisiacs in Pierid Butterflies: A Theme with Variation! , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[72] J. E. Oliver,et al. Pheromone hydrolysis by cuticular and interior esterases of the antennae, legs, and wings of the cabbage looper moth,Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) , 1982, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[73] J. Kochansky,et al. Sex pheromone of the european corn borer,Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in New York , 1975, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[74] J. Mcchesney,et al. Aphrodisiac pheromones of the sulfur butterfliesColias eurytheme andC. Philodice (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[75] Bonnie L Bassler,et al. Chemical communication among bacteria , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[76] J. Mallet,et al. Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation , 2003, Evolution & development.
[77] N. Finney,et al. A Simple and Advantageous Protocol for the Oxidation of Alcohols with o‐Iodoxybenzoic Acid (IBX). , 2002 .
[78] N. Finney,et al. A simple and advantageous protocol for the oxidation of alcohols with O-iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX). , 2002, Organic letters.
[79] Carole Ober,et al. Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor , 2002, Nature Genetics.
[80] Brian D. Ripley,et al. Modern Applied Statistics with S Fourth edition , 2002 .
[81] James Mallet,et al. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry , 2001, Nature.
[82] C. D. Jones. Extension of the Castle-Wright effective factor estimator to sex linkage and haplodiploidy. , 2001, The Journal of heredity.
[83] D. Ross,et al. SEX PHEROMONE BLEND OF THE PANDORA MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: SATURNIIDAE), AN OUTBREAK PEST IN PINE FORESTS (PINACEAE) , 2000, Canadian Entomologist.
[84] F. Zufall,et al. The cellular and molecular basis of odor adaptation. , 2000, Chemical senses.
[85] Ziheng Yang,et al. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[86] S. Schulz,et al. The pheromone system of the male danaine butterfly, Idea leuconoe. , 1996, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[87] H. Brown,et al. Reaction of sodium aluminum hydride with selected organic compounds containing representative functional groups. Comparison of the reducing characteristics of lithium and sodium aluminum hydrides , 1993 .
[88] R. Vane‐Wright,et al. Visual and Chemical Signalling in Butterflies: Functional and Phylogenetic Perspectives , 1993 .
[89] G. Bush,et al. Rhagoletis sibling species and host races differ in host odor recognition , 1990 .
[90] E. Myers,et al. Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.
[91] J. Tumlinson,et al. Identification of a pheromone blend attractive to Manduca sexta (L.) males in a wind tunnel , 1989 .
[92] K. Usui,et al. Sex Pheromone of the Rice Stem Borer, Chilo suppressalis (WALKER) (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae) : the Third Component, Z-9-Hexadecenal , 1983 .
[93] J. Felsenstein. SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[94] T. Eisner,et al. Sex Pheromone of the Queen Butterfly: Biology , 1969, Science.
[95] Y. Meinwald,et al. Sex Pheromone of the Queen Butterfly: Chemistry , 1969, Science.
[96] T. E. Pliske. Sex pheromone of the Queen butterfly , 1969 .