Fast, approximate algorithm for detection of solvent‐inaccessible atoms

Up to about half of the atoms in biopolymers are inaccessible to solvents. If such atoms can be rapidly identified, time can be saved in the subsequent computation of atomic surface areas. A quick, approximate method, termed buried atom elimination (BAE), was developed for the detection of such atoms. Following the literature, the method makes use of a Gaussian function to calculate the neighbor density in four tetrahedral directions in 3‐dimensional space, sometimes twice with different orientations. In macromolecules, our method detects between 63 and 81% of the buried atoms but also incorrectly classifies 2–8% of the exposed atoms as buried. These misidentified atoms all have small solvent‐exposed (accessible) surface areas (SASAs): their surfaces sum to a maximum of 0.5% of the molecular SASA, and their maximum atomic SASA is 5.1 Å2. Using our recently reported LCPO method for computing atomic surfaces, which is one of the fastest available, the use of BAE increases the overall speed of computing the atomic SASAs by a factor of up to 1.6 for surfaces only and 1.9 when first and second derivatives are computed. BAE decreases the LCPO average absolute atomic error from about 2.3 Å2 to about 1.7 Å2 (average for larger compounds). BAE was introduced into the MacroModel molecular modeling package and tests show that it increases the efficiency of first‐ and second‐derivative energy minimizations and molecular dynamics simulations without adversely affecting the stability or accuracy of the calculations. BAE parameters were developed for the most important atom types in biopolymers, based on a parameterization set of 18 compounds of different size (33–4346 atoms) and class (organics, proteins, DNA, and various complexes), consisting of a total of 23,186 atoms. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 20, 586–596, 1999

[1]  J. Janin,et al.  Analytical approximation to the accessible surface area of proteins. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R C Wade,et al.  Analytically defined surfaces to analyze molecular interaction properties. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[3]  Werner Braun,et al.  Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules , 1998 .

[4]  Doros N. Theodorou,et al.  Analytical treatment of the volume and surface area of molecules formed by an arbitrary collection of unequal spheres intersected by planes , 1991 .

[5]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Hydrophobic potential by pairwise surface area sum. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[7]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  M. Sanner,et al.  Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[9]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[10]  Frank Eisenhaber,et al.  Improved strategy in analytic surface calculation for molecular systems: Handling of singularities and computational efficiency , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Valentin Gogonea,et al.  An improved algorithm for the analytical computation of solvent‐excluded volume. The treatment of singularities in solvent‐accessible surface area and volume functions , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[12]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Armin A. Weiser,et al.  Neighbor‐list reduction: Optimization for computation of molecular van der Waals and solvent‐accessible surface areas , 1998 .

[14]  Akbar Nayeem,et al.  MSEED: A program for the rapid analytical determination of accessible surface areas and their derivatives , 1992 .

[15]  W. Clark Still,et al.  AMBER torsional parameters for the peptide backbone , 1992 .

[16]  W. C. Still,et al.  A rapid approximation to the solvent accessible surface areas of atoms , 1988 .

[17]  Werner Braun,et al.  Minimization of empirical energy functions in proteins including hydrophobic surface area effects , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  Y. Cui,et al.  Protein folding simulation with genetic algorithm and supersecondary structure constraints , 1998, Proteins.

[19]  S. Sridharan,et al.  A rapid method for calculating derivatives of solvent accessible surface areas of molecules , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  Roberto Cammi,et al.  Analytical first derivatives of molecular surfaces with respect to nuclear coordinates , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  W. Braun,et al.  Folding of Globular Proteins by Energy Minimization and Monte Carlo Simulations with Hydrophobic Surface Area Potentials , 1995 .

[22]  J. Weiser,et al.  HUNTER: A conformational search program for acyclic to polycyclic molecules with special emphasis on stereochemistry , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  J. Ponder,et al.  An efficient newton‐like method for molecular mechanics energy minimization of large molecules , 1987 .

[24]  C. Sander,et al.  An effective solvation term based on atomic occupancies for use in protein simulations , 1993 .

[25]  Robert B. Hermann,et al.  Theory of hydrophobic bonding. II. Correlation of hydrocarbon solubility in water with solvent cavity surface area , 1972 .

[26]  U. Singh,et al.  A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINS , 1984 .

[27]  G. Chang,et al.  Macromodel—an integrated software system for modeling organic and bioorganic molecules using molecular mechanics , 1990 .

[28]  Donald G. Truhlar,et al.  Improved methods for semiempirical solvation models , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  T. Richmond,et al.  Solvent accessible surface area and excluded volume in proteins. Analytical equations for overlapping spheres and implications for the hydrophobic effect. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  K. D. Gibson,et al.  Exact calculation of the volume and surface area of fused hard-sphere molecules with unequal atomic radii , 1987 .

[31]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  W. C. Still,et al.  Approximate atomic surfaces from linear combinations of pairwise overlaps (LCPO) , 1999 .