Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action

Many of the world’s biggest problems are being tackled through the formation of new groups yet very little research has directly observed the processes by which new groups form to respond to social problems. The current paper draws on seminal research by Lewin (1947) to advance a perspective as to how such identities form through processes of small group interaction. Multilevel structural equation modelling involving 58 small group discussions (with N = 234) demonstrates that focused group discussion can boost the commitment to take collective action, beliefs in the efficacy of that action, and members’ social identification with other supporters of the cause. The results are consistent with the new commitment to action flowing from emergent social identities.

[1]  Laura G. E. Smith,et al.  "We must be the change we want to see in the world": integrating norms and identities through social interaction , 2015 .

[2]  Avelie Stuart,et al.  Whatever happened to Kony2012? Understanding a global Internet phenomenon as an emergent social identity , 2015 .

[3]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities , 2015 .

[4]  Michel Bacq,et al.  In small groups , 2014 .

[5]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism , 2014 .

[6]  D. Dolinski,et al.  Social Influence , 2007 .

[7]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Bringing science to bear--on peace, not war: elaborating on psychology's potential to promote peace. , 2013, The American psychologist.

[8]  Catherine E. Amiot,et al.  Why and how are you attached to your social group? Investigating different forms of social identification. , 2013, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  Nicole Tausch,et al.  Emotional reactions to success and failure of collective action as predictors of future action intentions: a longitudinal investigation in the context of student protests in Germany. , 2013, The British journal of social psychology.

[10]  J. Dovidio.  Bridging intragroup processes and intergroup relations: needing the twain to meet. , 2013, The British journal of social psychology.

[11]  K. Jonas,et al.  Restoring Civil Societies: The Psychology of Intervention and Engagement Following Crisis , 2012 .

[12]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  Opinion-based groups and the restoration of civil society , 2012 .

[13]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs , 2012 .

[14]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Social identification dimensions as mediators of the effect of prototypicality on intergroup behaviours , 2011 .

[15]  Laura G. E. Smith,et al.  The power of talk: developing discriminatory group norms through discussion. , 2011, The British journal of social psychology.

[16]  Tom Postmes,et al.  The Induction of Shared Identity: The Positive Role of Individual Distinctiveness for Groups , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  Laura G. E. Smith,et al.  Shaping stereotypical behaviour through the discussion of social stereotypes. , 2011, The British journal of social psychology.

[18]  Laura G. E. Smith,et al.  Nice and Nasty: The Formation of Prosocial and Hostile Social Movements , 2010 .

[19]  Group transformation: How demonstrability promotes intra-group cooperation in social dilemmas , 2010 .

[20]  R. Lalonde,et al.  Why Do Students Strike? Direct and Indirect Determinants of Collective Action Participation , 2010 .

[21]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Time perspective and attitude-behaviour consistency in future-oriented behaviours. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[22]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power , 2010 .

[23]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  Collective Action as the Material Expression of Opinion‐Based Group Membership , 2009 .

[24]  B. Simon,et al.  Pathways to Collective Protest: Calculation, Identification, or Emotion? A Critical Analysis of the Role of Group-Based Anger in Social Movement Participation , 2009 .

[25]  Winnifred R. Louis,et al.  Collective Action—and Then What? , 2009 .

[26]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Aligning Identities, Emotions, and Beliefs to Create Commitment to Sustainable Social and Political Action , 2009, Personality and Social Psychology Review.

[27]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[28]  J. Cameron,et al.  Predictors of Protest Among Anti‐Globalization Demonstrators1 , 2009 .

[29]  Laura G. E. Smith,et al.  Intra-group interaction and the development of norms which promote inter-group hostility , 2009 .

[30]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Richard L. Moreland,et al.  Small‐Group Research in Social Psychology: Topics and Trends over Time , 2008 .

[33]  C. McGarty,et al.  Using group-based interaction to change stereotypes about people with mental disorders , 2007 .

[34]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Shared Cognition as a Product of, and Precursor to, Shared Identity in Negotiations , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[35]  Ana-Maria Bliuc,et al.  Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action , 2007 .

[36]  Sonia Roccas,et al.  The paradox of group-based guilt: modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group's moral violations. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  T. Postmes,et al.  Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Three-Dimensional Strength of Identification Across Group Memberships: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2005 .

[39]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation , 2005 .

[40]  J. Drury,et al.  Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes , 2005 .

[41]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Economics Wins, Psychology Loses, and Society Pays , 2005 .

[42]  Russell Spears,et al.  Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  J. Cameron,et al.  A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity , 2004 .

[44]  Steve Hinkle,et al.  The Social Identity Perspective , 2004 .

[45]  R. Ashmore,et al.  An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  J. Drury,et al.  The importance of social structure and social interaction in stereotype consensus and content: is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? , 2004 .

[47]  C. McGarty,et al.  A 100 years of certitude? Social psychology, the experimental method and the management of scientific uncertainty. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[48]  J. Drury,et al.  Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[49]  A. Bandura.  Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy , 2000 .

[50]  F Sani,et al.  Contested identities and schisms in groups: opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[51]  J. Drury,et al.  The Intergroup Dynamics of Collective Empowerment: Substantiating the Social Identity Model of Crowd Behavior , 1999 .

[52]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[53]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[54]  K. Lewin,et al.  Group decision and social change. , 1999 .

[55]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[56]  John C. Turner,et al.  When do stereotypes become really consensual? Investigating the group-based dynamics of the consensualization process , 1998 .

[57]  Jacquelien van Stekelenburg,et al.  The social psychology of protest , 1997 .

[58]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. , 1996 .

[59]  S. Reicher.  "The Battle of Westminster": Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. , 1996 .

[60]  Julian M Groves.  Learning to Feel: The Neglected Sociology of Social Movements , 1995 .

[61]  Richard L. Moreland,et al.  Back to the Future: Social Psychological Research on Groups , 1994 .

[62]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[63]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[64]  M. Hogg,et al.  Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. , 1990, The British journal of social psychology.

[65]  J. Turner,et al.  The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence , 1986 .

[66]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[67]  S. Reicher,et al.  The St. Pauls' riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. , 1984 .

[68]  D. Myers,et al.  Discussion Effects on Racial Attitudes , 1970, Science.

[69]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[70]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .