Are Children More Exposed to Radio Frequency Energy From Mobile Phones Than Adults?

There has been long-standing controversy, both among scientists and in the public, about whether children absorb more radio frequency (RF) energy in their heads than adults when using a mobile telephone. This review summarizes the current understanding of this issue, and some of the complexities in comparing the absorption of RF energy in different individuals from use of mobile phones. The discussion is limited to dosimetric issues, i.e., possible age-related differences in absorption of RF energy in the heads of mobile phone users. For most metrics of exposure, in particular those relevant to assessing the compliance of handsets with regulatory limits, there is no clear evidence for age-related differences in exposure. For two metrics of exposure, there is a clear evidence that age can play a factor: 1) the local specific absorption rate (SAR), in particular anatomically defined locations within the brain, will vary with head size and hence with age and 2) the SAR, in particular tissues, (e.g., bone marrow in the skull) can vary with age due to age-related differences in the dielectric properties of tissue. However, these differences involve SAR levels that are below the 1-g or 10-g peak spatial SAR (psSAR averaged over 1 or 10 g of tissue) and have no significance for compliance assessment. Age-related differences observed in worst case simulations such as presently considered are difficult to generalize to human populations under real-world exposure conditions due to many variables that determine SAR during realistic usages.

[1]  N. Kuster,et al.  Differences in energy absorption between heads of adults and children in the near field of sources. , 1998, Health physics.

[2]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  N. Kuster,et al.  Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above 300 MHz , 1992 .

[4]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Impact of pinna compression on the RF absorption in the heads of adult and juvenile cell phone users , 2010, Bioelectromagnetics.

[5]  S. Ueno,et al.  Comparison of specific absorption rate induced in brain tissues of a child and an adult using mobile phone , 2012 .

[6]  C. Gabriel,et al.  Variation of the dielectric properties of tissues with age: the effect on the values of SAR in children when exposed to walkie–talkie devices , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  SAR calculations in an anatomically realistic model of the head for mobile communication transceivers at 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and neck for mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz , 1996 .

[9]  Devra Lee Davis,et al.  Exposure Limits: The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children , 2012, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[10]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  N. Kuster,et al.  Differences in RF energy absorption in the heads of adults and children , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[12]  N. Kuster,et al.  A numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  V. Anderson.  Comparisons of peak SAR levels in concentric sphere head models of children and adults for irradiation by a dipole at 900 MHz. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  A. Cangellaris,et al.  Analysis of the numerical error caused by the stair-stepped approximation of a conducting boundary in FDTD simulations of electromagnetic phenomena , 1991 .

[15]  J. Wiart,et al.  Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  J. Wiart,et al.  Study of specific absorption rate (SAR) induced in two child head models and in adult heads using mobile phones , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[17]  Teemu Heikkilä,et al.  Volume-averaged SAR in adult and child head models when using mobile phones: a computational study with detailed CAD-based models of commercial mobile phones. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[18]  Margarethus M Paulides,et al.  Impact of head morphology on local brain specific absorption rate from exposure to mobile phone radiation. , 2015, Bioelectromagnetics.

[19]  Lars-Eric Larsson,et al.  Output power distributions of terminals in a 3G mobile communication network. , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[20]  D Mukherjee,et al.  Head circumference reference data: birth to 18 years. , 1987, Pediatrics.

[21]  Hyung-do Choi,et al.  Human Head Size and SAR Characteristics for Handset Exposure , 2002 .

[22]  A. Peyman.  Dielectric properties of tissues; variation with age and their relevance in exposure of children to electromagnetic fields; state of knowledge. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[23]  Osamu Fujiwara,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of electromagnetic absorption characteristics in realistic human head models of adult and children for 900-MHz mobile telephones , 2003 .

[24]  M. Martínez‐Búrdalo,et al.  Comparison of FDTD-calculated specific absorption rate in adults and children when using a mobile phone at 900 and 1800 MHz. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  O. Fujiwara,et al.  FDTD-derived correlation of maximum temperature increase and peak SAR in child and adult head models due to dipole antenna , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[26]  G. Bulla,et al.  Electromagnetic Absorption in the Head of Adults and Children Due to Mobile Phone Operation Close to the Head , 2006, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[27]  A. Faraone,et al.  Comparisons of computed mobile phone induced SAR in the SAM phantom to that in anatomically correct models of the human head , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[28]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Some present problems and a proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  A. Ahlbom.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[30]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  J. Wiart,et al.  Numerical dosimetry dedicated to children RF exposure. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[32]  S. Kesari,et al.  Why children absorb more microwave radiation than adults: The consequences , 2014 .

[33]  J. Wiart,et al.  Modeling of RF head exposure in children , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[34]  Jianqing Wang,et al.  Approximation of aging effect on dielectric tissue properties for SAR assessment of mobile telephones , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[35]  A. Faraone,et al.  Simulation of Exposure and SAR Estimation for Adult and Child Heads Exposed to Radiofrequency Energy from Portable Communication Devices , 2005, Radiation research.

[36]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Analysis of Power Absorbed by Children's Head as a Result of New Usages of Mobile Phone , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[37]  J. Keshvari,et al.  Comparison of radio frequency energy absorption in ear and eye region of children and adults at 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  James C. Lin,et al.  Radio frequency electromagnetic exposure: tutorial review on experimental dosimetry. , 1996, Bioelectromagnetics.