Nonlinear Real‐time Process Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis Based on Principal Component Analysis and Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis

The aim of this paper is to propose a novel real-time process monitoring and fault diagnosis method based on the principal component analysis (PCA) and kernel Fisher discriminant analysis (KFDA). There is a need to develop this method in order to overcome the inherent limitations of the current kernel FDA method. The idea of the method is to initially reduce dimensionality using PCA and then to map the score data in the reduced original space to the high-dimensional feature space via a nonlinear kernel function. Following this, the optimal Fisher feature vector and discriminant vector are extracted to perform process monitoring. If faults occur, the method uses the degree of similarity between the optimal discriminant vector presented and the optimal discriminant vector of the faults in the historical dataset to perform a diagnosis. The proposed method can effectively capture nonlinear relationships in process variables. In comparison with kernel FDA, the PCA plus kernel FDA method is more efficient and has a more rapid response when used to undertake online monitoring and fault diagnosis. In this study, the method is evaluated by applying it to the fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) process. As a consequence, its effectiveness is demonstrated.

[1]  M. Kramer Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks , 1991 .

[2]  Uwe Kruger,et al.  Recursive partial least squares algorithms for monitoring complex industrial processes , 2003 .

[3]  Leo H. Chiang,et al.  Fault diagnosis in chemical processes using Fisher discriminant analysis, discriminant partial least squares, and principal component analysis , 2000 .

[4]  Gary Montague,et al.  Non-linear principal components analysis using genetic programming , 1997 .

[5]  David J. Sandoz,et al.  The application of principal component analysis and kernel density estimation to enhance process monitoring , 2000 .

[6]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems , 2001 .

[7]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[8]  G. Irwin,et al.  Process monitoring approach using fast moving window PCA , 2005 .

[9]  Barry M. Wise,et al.  The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection , 1995 .

[10]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Non-parametric confidence bounds for process performance monitoring charts☆ , 1996 .

[11]  Q. Peter He,et al.  A New Fault Diagnosis Method Using Fault Directions in Fisher Discriminant Analysis , 2005 .

[12]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[13]  B. Bakshi Multiscale PCA with application to multivariate statistical process monitoring , 1998 .

[14]  Elaine B. Martin,et al.  Non-linear principal components analysis with application to process fault detection , 2000, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[15]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis , 1995 .

[16]  C. Yoo,et al.  Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis , 2004 .

[17]  T. McAvoy,et al.  Nonlinear principal component analysis—Based on principal curves and neural networks , 1996 .

[18]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Dynamic simulator for a Model IV fluid catalytic cracking unit , 1993 .

[19]  J. Macgregor,et al.  Monitoring batch processes using multiway principal component analysis , 1994 .