Improving anatomical mapping of complexly deformed anatomy for external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy dose accumulation in cervical cancer.

PURPOSE In the treatment of cervical cancer, large anatomical deformations, caused by, e.g., tumor shrinkage, bladder and rectum filling changes, organ sliding, and the presence of the brachytherapy (BT) applicator, prohibit the accumulation of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and BT dose distributions. This work proposes a structure-wise registration with vector field integration (SW+VF) to map the largely deformed anatomies between EBRT and BT, paving the way for 3D dose accumulation between EBRT and BT. METHODS T2w-MRIs acquired before EBRT and as a part of the MRI-guided BT procedure for 12 cervical cancer patients, along with the manual delineations of the bladder, cervix-uterus, and rectum-sigmoid, were used for this study. A rigid transformation was used to align the bony anatomy in the MRIs. The proposed SW+VF method starts by automatically segmenting features in the area surrounding the delineated organs. Then, each organ and feature pair is registered independently using a feature-based nonrigid registration algorithm developed in-house. Additionally, a background transformation is calculated to account for areas far from all organs and features. In order to obtain one transformation that can be used for dose accumulation, the organ-based, feature-based, and the background transformations are combined into one vector field using a weighted sum, where the contribution of each transformation can be directly controlled by its extent of influence (scope size). The optimal scope sizes for organ-based and feature-based transformations were found by an exhaustive analysis. The anatomical correctness of the mapping was independently validated by measuring the residual distances after transformation for delineated structures inside the cervix-uterus (inner anatomical correctness), and for anatomical landmarks outside the organs in the surrounding region (outer anatomical correctness). The results of the proposed method were compared with the results of the rigid transformation and nonrigid registration of all structures together (AST). RESULTS The rigid transformation achieved a good global alignment (mean outer anatomical correctness of 4.3 mm) but failed to align the deformed organs (mean inner anatomical correctness of 22.4 mm). Conversely, the AST registration produced a reasonable alignment for the organs (6.3 mm) but not for the surrounding region (16.9 mm). SW+VF registration achieved the best results for both regions (3.5 and 3.4 mm for the inner and outer anatomical correctness, respectively). All differences were significant (p < 0.02, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Additionally, optimization of the scope sizes determined that the method was robust for a large range of scope size values. CONCLUSIONS The novel SW+VF method improved the mapping of large and complex deformations observed between EBRT and BT for cervical cancer patients. Future studies that quantify the mapping error in terms of dose errors are required to test the clinical applicability of dose accumulation by the SW+VF method.

[1]  Luiza Bondar,et al.  A symmetric nonrigid registration method to handle large organ deformations in cervical cancer patients. , 2010, Medical physics.

[2]  Luiza Bondar,et al.  Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Three-dimensional multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medical images , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  P. Wielopolski,et al.  MR guided applicator reconstruction for brachytherapy of cervical cancer using the novel titanium Rotterdam applicator. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  D Sarrut,et al.  Registration of sliding objects using direction dependent B-splines decomposition , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Daniel Berger,et al.  Dosimetric impact of interobserver variability in MRI-based delineation for cervical cancer brachytherapy. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Stefan Jeschke,et al.  Dart Throwing on Surfaces , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[8]  M W Vannier,et al.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  S Wognum,et al.  Control over structure-specific flexibility improves anatomical accuracy for point-based deformable registration in bladder cancer radiotherapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[10]  Ben J M Heijmen,et al.  A novel flexible framework with automatic feature correspondence optimization for nonrigid registration in radiotherapy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[11]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  M. Saiful Huq,et al.  Mapping of dose distribution from IMRT onto MRI-guided high dose rate brachytherapy using deformable image registration for cervical cancer treatments: preliminary study with commercially available software , 2014, Journal of contemporary brachytherapy.

[13]  François-Xavier Vialard,et al.  Piecewise-diffeomorphic image registration: Application to the motion estimation between 3D CT lung images with sliding conditions , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Sebastian Schafer,et al.  Extra-dimensional Demons: a method for incorporating missing tissue in deformable image registration. , 2012, Medical physics.

[15]  D. Hill,et al.  Deformations incorporating rigid structures [medical imaging] , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[16]  Pascal Haigron,et al.  Inter-individual organ-driven CT registration for dose mapping in prostate cancer radiotherapy , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[17]  W. Tomé,et al.  On the dosimetric effect and reduction of inverse consistency and transitivity errors in deformable image registration for dose accumulation. , 2011, Medical physics.

[18]  Martijn Ketelaars,et al.  Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Danielle F. Pace,et al.  Sliding Geometries in Deformable Image Registration , 2011, Abdominal Imaging.

[20]  Inger-Karine K Kolkman-Deurloo,et al.  Three-dimensional dose addition of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for oropharyngeal patients using nonrigid registration. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Eigil Samset,et al.  A Non-rigid Registration Framework That Accommodates Resection and Retraction , 2009, IPMI.

[22]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[23]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  R. Pötter,et al.  Curative radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: brachytherapy is NOT optional. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Piotr Wielopolski,et al.  Accurate CT∕MR vessel-guided nonrigid registration of largely deformed livers. , 2012, Medical physics.

[26]  S Wognum,et al.  Validation of deformable image registration algorithms on CT images of ex vivo porcine bladders with fiducial markers. , 2014, Medical physics.

[27]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[28]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.