A biomass fuel feeding system has been designed, constructed and evaluated for a fluidized bed gasifier (FBG) pilot plant at the University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, SK, Canada). The system was designed for meat and bone meal (MBM) to be injected into the gasifier at a mass flow-rate range of 1-5 g/s. The designed system consists of two stages of screw conveyors, including a metering stage which controlled the flow-rate of fuel, a rotary airlock and an injection conveyor stage, which delivered that fuel at a consistent rate to the FBG. The rotary airlock which was placed between these conveyors, proved unable to maintain a pressure seal, thus the entire conveying system was sealed and pressurized. A pneumatic injection nozzle was also fabricated, tested and fitted to the end of the injection conveyor for direct injection and dispersal into the fluidized bed. The 150 mm metering screw conveyor was shown to effectively control the mass output rate of the system, across a fuel output range of 1-25 g/s, while the addition of the 50mm injection screw conveyor reduced the irregularity (error) of the system output rate from 47% to 15%. Although material plugging was found to be an issue in the inlet hopper to the injection conveyor, the addition of air sparging ports and a system to pulse air into those ports was found to successfully eliminate this issue. The addition of the pneumatic injection nozzle reduced the output irregularity further to 13%, with an air supply of 50 slpm as the minimum air supply to drive this injector. After commissioning of this final system to the FBG reactor, the injection nozzle was found to plug with char however, and was subsequently removed from the system. Final operation of the reactor continues satisfactorily with the two screw conveyors operating at matching pressure with the fluidized bed, with the output rate of the system estimated based on system characteristic equations, and confirmed by static weight measurements made before and after testing. The error rate by this method is reported to be approximately 10%, which is slightly better than the estimated error rate of 15% for the conveyor system. The reliability of this measurement prediction method relies upon the relative consistency of the physical properties of MBM with respect to its bulk density and feeding characteristics.
[1]
John R. Grace,et al.
Biomass granular screw feeding: An experimental investigation
,
2011
.
[2]
Carl Wilén,et al.
Handling and feeding of biomass to pressurized reactors: Safety engineering
,
1993
.
[3]
Jun Zhang,et al.
An automatic shake mechanism for the biomass pyrolysis feeding system
,
2011
.
[4]
E. Pavlidou,et al.
Experimental investigation of fluidised bed co-combustion of meat and bone meal with coals and olive bagasse
,
2006
.
[5]
Co-combustion of Agricultural Residues with Coal: Turning Waste into Energy
,
2010
.
[6]
P. Basu.
Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds
,
2006
.
[7]
A. Ertas,et al.
Biomass Feed System Flow Control Using a Weigh Belt Table
,
2005
.
[8]
R. A. Flores,et al.
Factors contributing to the poor bulk behavior of meat and bone meal and methods for improving these behaviors.
,
2007,
Bioresource technology.
[9]
Mohammad Reza Alizadeh,et al.
Screw conveyors power and throughput analysis during horizontal handling of paddy grains.
,
2010
.
[10]
Raymond A. Kulwiec.
Materials Handling Handbook
,
1985
.
[11]
Paul W. Cleary,et al.
Screw conveyor performance: comparison of discrete element modelling with laboratory experiments
,
2010
.
[12]
B. Kjellström,et al.
Development of a sugar cane residue feeding system for a cyclone gasifier
,
1998
.
[13]
R. A. Flores,et al.
CHARACTERISTICS OF NORTH AMERICAN MEAT AND BONE MEAL RELEVANT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF NON-FEED APPLICATIONS
,
2006
.