The architectural adaptation of urban economic life: Location, use and form of the commercial-residential building in Cardiff

Revisiting Jane Jacob's notion of locality knowledge, this paper argues that combining commercial space and dwelling fosters social, economic and architectural processes that come about by factors of local urban economies. The mixing of uses merges the relation of 'what one does' and 'where one lives' in a particular building whereby urban and architectural scale effects come into place. Comparisons of commercial-residential buildings in two local districts of contrasting morphologies in the city of Cardiff are studied in the context of their urban-architectural design scales. From an urban scale analysis, attention is given to the distribution of commercial-residential buildings in relation to spatial centrality; from an architectural perspective, it examines the way residential building adapts commercial additions, defining how different functions associate distinctive adaptable typologies depending on the building's urban location. By using syntactical and morphological approaches, the paper combines Depth Distance analysis with patterns of use and building form, drawing two reportable findings: The identification of corner shops located within one turn of direction from main high streets within gridiron urban forms, while activities combining retail or local office businesses with residential functions are located in corner blocks along streets within radial urban morphologies. These spatial attributes of location combine the adaptability of local property markets to mixed use with advantages in accessibility to produce an urban building that can flexibly accommodate innovation that is both a reflection of new skills and knowledge contributing to a local diversity.

[1]  M. Richards,et al.  A city is not a tree , 2017 .

[2]  L. Marcus,et al.  Spatial Sustainability in Cities Organic Patterns and Sustainable Forms , 2009 .

[3]  L March The Architecture of Form , 2010 .

[4]  A Siksna,et al.  The effects of block size and form in North American and Australian city centres , 1997 .

[5]  C. Webster,et al.  Property rights, planning and markets: managing spontaneous cities , 2003 .

[6]  Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[7]  Chris Webster,et al.  Pricing accessibility: Urban morphology, design and missing markets , 2010 .

[8]  J. Jacobs,et al.  The Economy of Cities , 1969 .

[9]  A. Penn,et al.  Creating Urban Place: Re-thinking the Value of Residential and Commercial Use in Urban Street Networks , 2012 .

[10]  Ivor Samuels,et al.  Urban Forms: The Death and Life of the Urban Block , 2004 .

[11]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement , 2005 .

[12]  L. Marcus Spatial Capital and how to measure it : An outline of an analytical theory of urban form , 2008 .

[13]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids , 1999 .

[14]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine , 1996 .

[15]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[16]  H. Davis Living Over the Store: Architecture and Local Urban Life , 2012 .

[17]  A. Penn,et al.  The spatial dimensions of trade: From the geography of uses to the architecture of local economies , 2014 .