Correction of multi-frequency GPR wave velocity with distorted hyperbolic reflections from GPR surveys of underground utilities

Abstract Estimation of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) wave velocity and the real part of dielectric permittivity ( e ′ ) play an important role when assessing the condition of buried objects because e ′ is highly affected by moisture and void content in materials. However, errors in velocity occur due to the effect of oblique angles between the alignment of pipelines and GPR traverses during common offset survey. In this paper, field experiments on paving blocks and reinforced concrete were conducted in order to investigate errors caused by the effects of oblique angles on GPR wave velocity. GPR traverses were designed to travel along several oblique angles (θ = 30°, 45°, 60°¸75°, 90°, 105°, 120°, 135° and 150°) relative to the alignment of a ductile iron (DI) pipe. Antennas with various nominal centre frequencies (IDS 200/600, GSSI 400/900 and Sensor & Software 250 MHz) were applied in order to compare the effects. It was found that wider and flatter hyperbolic reflections are obtained and the estimated GPR wave velocity is higher if the included angle between the alignment of the DI pipe and GPR traverse changes from being perpendicular to oblique. The relative error of velocities estimated at oblique angles when compared to that estimated in perpendicular cases can be as much as 44%. Specific steps were taken to correct the errors. It is believed that this study suggests a method whereby the measurement accuracy of velocity estimation for GPR condition surveys of underground utilities can be increased.

[1]  Martin Krause,et al.  3D-visualisation of NDT data using a data fusion technique , 2003 .

[2]  C. Balanis.  Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[3]  Herbert Wiggenhauser,et al.  Correction of GPR wave velocity at different oblique angles between traverses and alignment of line objects in a common offset antenna setting , 2016 .

[4]  Janet F.C. Sham,et al.  Perturbation mapping of water leak in buried water pipes via laboratory validation experiments with high-frequency ground penetrating radar (GPR) , 2016 .

[5]  Herbert Wiggenhauser,et al.  Frequency-dependent dispersion of high-frequency ground penetrating radar wave in concrete , 2011 .

[6]  Michael Burrow,et al.  Condition assessment of the buried utility service infrastructure , 2012 .

[7]  Martin Krause,et al.  2D- and 3D-visualisation of NDT-data using data fusion technique , 2005 .

[8]  Charalampos Tsimenidis,et al.  Low Complexity Iterative Receiver Design for Shallow Water Acoustic Channels , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[9]  Harry M. Jol,et al.  Ground penetrating radar : theory and applications , 2009 .

[10]  C. Poon,et al.  Unsaturated zone characterization in soil through transient wetting and drying using GPR joint time-frequency analysis and grayscale images , 2012 .

[11]  Herbert Wiggenhauser,et al.  A Study of Concrete Hydration and Dielectric Relaxation Mechanism Using Ground Penetrating Radar and Short-Time Fourier Transform , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[12]  Janet F.C. Sham,et al.  Development of a new algorithm for accurate estimation of GPR's wave propagation velocity by common-offset survey method , 2016 .

[13]  Herbert Wiggenhauser,et al.  Using ground penetrating radar and time–frequency analysis to characterize construction materials , 2011 .

[14]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Characterization of concrete properties from dielectric properties using ground penetrating radar , 2009 .

[15]  H. Ikeno,et al.  Root orientation can affect detection accuracy of ground-penetrating radar , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[16]  Nicole Metje,et al.  Underground asset location and condition assessment technologies , 2007 .