WOMBAT-P: Benchmarking Label-Free Proteomics Data Analysis Workflows
暂无分享,去创建一个
J. Vizcaíno | V. Schwämmle | S. Capella-Gutiérrez | J. Uszkoreit | Laura Rodríguez-Navas | D. Bouyssié | Dirk Winkelhardt | J. M. Fernández | Y. Hagemeijer | Pınar Altıner | P. Mauri | Dario Di Silvestre | F. Levander | Peter Horvatovich | Martin Hubálek | M. Palmblad | Wolfgang Raffelsberger | Balázs Tibor Kunkli | Yves Vandenbrouck
[1] William Stafford Noble,et al. Bridging the False Discovery Gap. , 2023, Journal of proteome research.
[2] J. Sweedler,et al. Assessment and Comparison of Database Search Engines for Peptidomic Applications. , 2023, Journal of proteome research.
[3] David D. Shteynberg,et al. Trans-Proteomic Pipeline: Robust Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis Suite. , 2023, Journal of proteome research.
[4] Gary D Bader,et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022 , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..
[5] A. Brazma,et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..
[6] Paul T. Groth,et al. Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate , 2021, Data Sci..
[7] Xiaochen Bo,et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data , 2021, Innovation.
[8] A. Brazma,et al. A proteomics sample metadata representation for multiomics integration and big data analysis , 2021, Nature Communications.
[9] J. Ison,et al. APE in the Wild: Automated Exploration of Proteomics Workflows in the bio.tools Registry , 2021, Journal of proteome research.
[10] J. Vizcaíno,et al. BioContainers Registry: searching bioinformatics and proteomics tools, packages, and containers , 2021, Journal of proteome research.
[11] R. Durán,et al. Quantitative proteomic dataset from oro- and naso-pharyngeal swabs used for COVID-19 diagnosis: Detection of viral proteins and host's biological processes altered by the infection , 2020, Data in Brief.
[12] Yasset Perez-Riverol,et al. Towards a sample metadata standard in public proteomics repositories. , 2020, Journal of proteome research.
[13] Sebastian Gibb,et al. MSnbase, efficient and elegant R-based processing and visualisation of raw mass spectrometry data , 2020, bioRxiv.
[14] Yohann Couté,et al. Proline: an efficient and user-friendly software suite for large-scale proteomics , 2020, Bioinform..
[15] Sven Nahnsen,et al. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.
[16] Marie Locard-Paulet,et al. Comparing 22 popular phosphoproteomics pipelines for peptide identification and site localization. , 2020, Journal of proteome research.
[17] G. Rambold,et al. FAIR digital objects in environmental and life sciences should comprise workflow operation design data and method information for repeatability of study setups and reproducibility of results , 2020, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.
[18] Veit Schwämmle,et al. PolySTest: Robust Statistical Testing of Proteomics Data with Missing Values Improves Detection of Biologically Relevant Features , 2019, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[19] Hedi Peterson,et al. The bio.tools registry of software tools and data resources for the life sciences , 2019, Genome Biology.
[20] Lennart Martens,et al. ThermoRawFileParser: modular, scalable and cross-platform RAW file conversion , 2019, bioRxiv.
[21] Fredrik Levander,et al. NormalyzerDE: Online Tool for Improved Normalization of Omics Expression Data and High-Sensitivity Differential Expression Analysis. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.
[22] Anna-Lena Lamprecht,et al. Automated workflow composition in mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2018, Bioinform..
[23] Brent S. Pedersen,et al. Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences , 2018, Nature Methods.
[24] Harald Barsnes,et al. SearchGUI: A Highly Adaptable Common Interface for Proteomics Search and de Novo Engines. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.
[25] Luis Mendoza,et al. StPeter: Seamless Label-Free Quantification with the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.
[26] Kris Gevaert,et al. Experimental design and data-analysis in label-free quantitative LC/MS proteomics: A tutorial with MSqRob. , 2018, Journal of proteomics.
[27] Jing Zhao,et al. Protein-Level Integration Strategy of Multiengine MS Spectra Search Results for Higher Confidence and Sequence Coverage. , 2017, Journal of proteome research.
[28] Alfonso Valencia,et al. Lessons Learned: Recommendations for Establishing Critical Periodic Scientific Benchmarking , 2017, bioRxiv.
[29] Maria K. Jaakkola,et al. ROTS: An R package for reproducibility-optimized statistical testing , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[30] Harald Barsnes,et al. BioContainers: an open-source and community-driven framework for software standardization , 2017, Bioinform..
[31] Martin Eisenacher,et al. In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics. , 2017, Journal of proteomics.
[32] Magnus Palmblad,et al. Visualizing and comparing results of different peptide identification methods , 2016, Briefings Bioinform..
[33] Jüergen Cox,et al. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics , 2016, Nature Protocols.
[34] Benjamin A. Garcia,et al. Evaluation of Proteomic Search Engines for the Analysis of Histone Modifications , 2014, Journal of proteome research.
[35] Steve Pettifer,et al. EDAM: an ontology of bioinformatics operations, types of data and identifiers, topics and formats , 2013, Bioinform..
[36] J. Eng,et al. Comet: An open‐source MS/MS sequence database search tool , 2013, Proteomics.
[37] Olga Vitek,et al. A statistical model-building perspective to identification of MS/MS spectra with PeptideProphet , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.
[38] R. Breitling,et al. msCompare: A Framework for Quantitative Analysis of Label-free LC-MS Data for Comparative Candidate Biomarker Studies* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[39] Natalie I. Tasman,et al. iProphet: Multi-level Integrative Analysis of Shotgun Proteomic Data Improves Peptide and Protein Identification Rates and Error Estimates* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[40] William Stafford Noble,et al. On using samples of known protein content to assess the statistical calibration of scores assigned to peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.
[41] Lennart Martens,et al. compomics-utilities: an open-source Java library for computational proteomics , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.
[42] Tuula A Nyman,et al. Compid: a new software tool to integrate and compare MS/MS based protein identification results from Mascot and Paragon. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.
[43] M. Scalf,et al. Fast, Free, and Flexible Peptide and Protein Quantification with FlashLFQ. , 2023, Methods in molecular biology.
[44] O. Jensen,et al. Robust statistical testing of proteomics data with missing values improves detection of biologically relevant features , 2020 .