Building a Tool for Battle Planning: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Experimental Findings

Use of knowledge-based decision aids can help alleviate the challenges of planning complex operations. We describe a knowledge-based tool capable of translating a high-level concept for a tactical military operation into a fully detailed, actionable plan, producing automatically (or with human guidance) plans with realistic degree of detail and complexity. Tight interleaving of planning, adversary estimates, scheduling, routing, attrition and consumption processes comprise the computational approach of this tool. Although originally developed for Army large-unit operations, the technology is generic and also applies to a number of other domains, particularly in critical situations requiring detailed planning within a constrained period of time. In this paper, we focus particularly on the engineering tradeoffs in the design of the tool. An experimental comparative evaluation indicated that the tool's performance compared favorably with human planners.

[1]  J. B. Cruz,et al.  Moving horizon Nash strategies for a military air operation , 2002 .

[2]  Avrim Blum,et al.  Fast Planning Through Planning Graph Analysis , 1995, IJCAI.

[3]  Chris Elsaesser,et al.  An architecture for adversarial planning , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  A. Kott A Multi-Decompositional Approach to Integration of Planning and Scheduling-An Applied Perspective , 1998 .

[5]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Helping Humans: Agents for Distributed Space Operations , 2003 .

[6]  David E. Wilkins,et al.  A Common Knowledge Representation for Plan Generation and Reactive Execution , 1995, J. Log. Comput..

[7]  William E. Bohman STAFFSIM, an interactive simulation for rapid, real time course of action analysis by U.S. Army Brigade Staffs , 1999 .

[8]  Trevor Nevitt Dupuy,et al.  Attrition: Forecasting Battle Casualties and Equipment Losses in Modern War , 1996 .

[9]  Alexander Kott,et al.  Configuration Tree Solver: A Technology for Automated Design and Configuration , 1992 .

[10]  Resource Configuration and Allocation : A Case Study of Constrained Heuristics , 1992 .

[11]  Josef Stoer,et al.  Numerische Mathematik 1 , 1989 .

[12]  C. C. FOX-GA : A Planning Support Tool for Assisting Military Planners in a Dynamic and Uncertain Environment , 2003 .

[13]  David E. Wilkins,et al.  A Call for Knowledge-Based Planning , 2001, AI Mag..

[14]  David E. Wilkins,et al.  Applying an AI Planner to Military Operations Planning , 1993 .

[15]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[16]  Robert H. Kewley,et al.  Fuzzy-genetic decision optimization for positioning of military combat units , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[17]  Jose B. Cruz,et al.  Moving horizon game theoretic approaches for control strategies in a military operation , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[18]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  AI on the battlefield: an experimental exploration , 2002, AAAI/IAAI.

[19]  David L. Westbrook,et al.  Capture the Flag: Military Simulation Meets Computer Games , 1999 .

[20]  David E. Wilkins,et al.  A Multiagent Planning Architecture , 1998, AIPS.

[21]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Resource configuration and allocation-a case study of constrained heuristic search , 1992, IEEE Expert.

[22]  John Levine,et al.  Using AI Planning Technology for Army Small Unit Operations , 2000, AIPS.

[23]  George S. Patton,et al.  War as I Knew It , 1975 .