A Model for Design of Human Activity Systems

A background is given to the common failures of management information systems and the authors' view of the causes behind these failures. There seems to be a lack of effective methods for analyzing information requirements. Different scientific methods are discussed as to their propensity for analyzing the information requirements. The importance of the systems design approach instead of the system improvement approach is emphasized. The concept of Human Activity Systems is discussed and an analysis of the interdependence of the soft and hard parts of these systems indicates that an integrated view is necessary. A methodology based on a systemic and systematic analysis of the information requirements in an organization is proposed. This methodology focuses the settings of the decisions on all levels in organizations and also indicates organizational discrepancies and information imbalances. The methodology can be regarded as a dynamic, learning system.

[1]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Review: Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies , 1995 .

[2]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[3]  V. Ridgway.  Dysfunctional Consequences of Performance Measurements , 1956 .

[4]  P J Lewis.  Applying soft systems methodology to an SSADM feasibility study: CCTA , 1995 .

[5]  Alberto M. Bento.  Systems analysis: A decision approach , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[6]  C. West Churchman,et al.  The Systems Approach , 1979 .

[7]  Janis A. Bubenko,et al.  Extending the Scope of Information Modelling , 1993, International Workshop on the Deductive Approach to Information Systems and Databases.

[8]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Determining Management Information Needs: A Comparison of Methods , 1977, MIS Q..

[9]  S. Beer.  The Brain of the Firm , 1972 .

[10]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Systems development methodologies: unanswered questions , 1995, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Kevin Warwick,et al.  Dealing with Complexity , 1998, Perspectives in Neural Computing.

[12]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[13]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Management misinformation systems , 1967 .

[14]  Peter Checkland,et al.  A role for soft systems methodology in information systems development , 1995 .

[15]  T. Redman.  Improve Data Quality for Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[16]  G. Morgan,et al.  Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. , 1984 .

[17]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[18]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Why information systems fail: a case study approach , 1993 .

[19]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[20]  Gordon Lindsay Glegg,et al.  The science of design , 1973 .

[21]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[22]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Synthesis of Research on Requirements Analysis and Knowledge Acquisition Techniques , 1992, MIS Q..

[23]  C. Churchman.  The systems approach and its enemies , 1979 .

[24]  Russell L. Ackoff.  A concept of corporate planning , 1969 .

[25]  K. Sengupta,et al.  Cognitive feedback in environments characterized by irrelevant information , 1995 .

[26]  E. Jantsch.  The design of inquiring systems,: by C. West Churchman New York, Basic Books, 1972. , 1972 .

[27]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Developing Managerial Information Systems , 1980 .

[28]  John P. Van Gigch,et al.  Applied General Systems Theory , 1974 .

[29]  P. Drucker.  Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[30]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Strategies for Information Requirements Determination , 1982, IBM Syst. J..

[31]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[32]  John P. van Gigch,et al.  System Design Modeling and Metamodeling , 1991 .

[33]  William J. Bruns,et al.  The information mosaic , 1992 .