Dynamic Signaling in the Hog1 MAPK Pathway Relies on High Basal Signal Transduction

High intrinsic basal signaling in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways ensures proper dynamic responses to environmental stimuli. Intrinsically Responsive Macia et al. found that when the activity of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Hog1, was inhibited, the phosphorylated form of this MAPK accumulated, suggesting that signaling occurs even in the absence of stress. The basal signaling was found to be held in check by a negative feedback loop that required the kinase activity of Hog1. A model of the system that included the basal signal and the negative feedback recapitulated the experimental data and suggested that intrinsic basal signaling poises the system to respond rapidly even to small changes in osmolarity. A similar basal activity was also detected for two additional yeast MAPKs, those involved in the pheromone response, suggesting that high basal signaling may be a common property of MAPK pathways. Appropriate regulation of the Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is essential for cells to survive osmotic stress. Here, we show that the two sensing mechanisms upstream of Hog1 display different signaling properties. The Sho1 branch is an inducible nonbasal system, whereas the Sln1 branch shows high basal signaling that is restricted by a MAPK-mediated feedback mechanism. A two-dimensional mathematical model of the Snl1 branch, including high basal signaling and a Hog1-regulated negative feedback, shows that a system with basal signaling exhibits higher efficiency, with faster response times and higher sensitivity to variations in external signals, than would systems without basal signaling. Analysis of two other yeast MAPK pathways, the Fus3 and Kss1 signaling pathways, indicates that high intrinsic basal signaling may be a general property of MAPK pathways allowing rapid and sensitive responses to environmental changes.

[1]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Sho1 and Pbs2 act as coscaffolds linking components in the yeast high osmolarity MAP kinase pathway. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[2]  Francesc Posas,et al.  Activation of the yeast SSK2 MAP kinase kinase kinase by the SSK1 two‐component response regulator , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[3]  E. Klipp,et al.  Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  J. Avruch,et al.  Mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[5]  H. Saito,et al.  Regulation of the osmoregulatory HOG MAPK cascade in yeast. , 2004, Journal of biochemistry.

[6]  Christoph H. Borchers,et al.  A Systems-Biology Analysis of Feedback Inhibition in the Sho1 Osmotic-Stress-Response Pathway , 2007, Current Biology.

[7]  J. Thorner,et al.  Analysis of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Specificity in Response to Hyperosmotic Stress: Use of an Analog-Sensitive HOG1 Allele , 2006, Eukaryotic Cell.

[8]  J. Collins,et al.  Gene regulation: Neutralizing noise in gene networks , 2000, Nature.

[9]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[10]  Kazuo Tatebayashi,et al.  Adaptor functions of Cdc42, Ste50, and Sho1 in the yeast osmoregulatory HOG MAPK pathway , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[11]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Sungjoon Kim,et al.  Dissecting yeast Hog1 MAP kinase pathway using a chemical genetic approach , 2007, FEBS Letters.

[13]  Mutsuhiro Takekawa,et al.  Protein phosphatase 2Cα inhibits the human stress‐responsive p38 and JNK MAPK pathways , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[14]  S. Hohmann Osmotic Stress Signaling and Osmoadaptation in Yeasts , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[15]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[16]  R. Yu,et al.  Fus3 generates negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast pheromone response , 2008, Nature.

[17]  Gustav Ammerer,et al.  Polarized localization of yeast Pbs2 depends on osmostress, the membrane protein Sho1 and Cdc42 , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  I. Ota,et al.  Two Protein-tyrosine Phosphatases Inactivate the Osmotic Stress Response Pathway in Yeast by Targeting the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase, Hog1* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Ira Herskowitz,et al.  Yeast go the whole HOG for the hyperosmotic response. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[20]  T. Maeda,et al.  Regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HOG1 mitogen-activated protein kinase by the PTP2 and PTP3 protein tyrosine phosphatases , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[21]  P. Pryciak,et al.  Interaction with the SH3 Domain Protein Bem1 Regulates Signaling by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae p21-Activated Kinase Ste20 , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[22]  J. Thorner,et al.  Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[23]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  The Frequency Dependence of Osmo-Adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Science.

[24]  Stefan Hohmann,et al.  Yeast osmoregulation. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[25]  T. Maeda,et al.  Activation of yeast PBS2 MAPKK by MAPKKKs or by binding of an SH3-containing osmosensor. , 1995, Science.

[26]  H. Dohlman,et al.  Pheromone Signaling Pathways in Yeast , 2006, Science's STKE.

[27]  Eulàlia de Nadal,et al.  Mucins, osmosensors in eukaryotic cells? , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[28]  F. Posas,et al.  Osmotic activation of the HOG MAPK pathway via Ste11p MAPKKK: scaffold role of Pbs2p MAPKK. , 1997, Science.

[29]  Francesc Posas,et al.  Yeast HOG1 MAP Kinase Cascade Is Regulated by a Multistep Phosphorelay Mechanism in the SLN1–YPD1–SSK1 “Two-Component” Osmosensor , 1996, Cell.

[30]  M. Gustin,et al.  MAP kinases and the adaptive response to hypertonicity: functional preservation from yeast to mammals. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[31]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Regulated nucleo/cytoplasmic exchange of HOG1 MAPK requires the importin β homologs NMD5 and XPO1 , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[32]  Peter G. Schultz,et al.  A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase , 2000, Nature.

[33]  Kazuo Tatebayashi,et al.  Transmembrane mucins Hkr1 and Msb2 are putative osmosensors in the SHO1 branch of yeast HOG pathway , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[34]  Francesc Posas,et al.  Requirement of STE50 for Osmostress-Induced Activation of the STE11 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase Kinase in the High-Osmolarity Glycerol Response Pathway , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[35]  Norinobu M. Watanabe,et al.  The Ste20 group kinases as regulators of MAP kinase cascades. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[36]  S. Strogatz Interpreting the Human Phase Response Curve to Multiple Bright-Light Exposures , 1990, Journal of biological rhythms.

[37]  Eulàlia de Nadal,et al.  Dealing with osmostress through MAP kinase activation , 2002, EMBO reports.

[38]  J. Thorner,et al.  The RA Domain of Ste50 Adaptor Protein Is Required for Delivery of Ste11 to the Plasma Membrane in the Filamentous Growth Signaling Pathway of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[39]  Marcus Krantz,et al.  Comparative genomics of the HOG-signalling system in fungi , 2006, Current Genetics.