Differences in spawning date between populations of common frog reveal local adaptation

Phenotypic differences between populations often correlate with climate variables, resulting from a combination of environment-induced plasticity and local adaptation. Species comprising populations that are genetically adapted to local climatic conditions should be more vulnerable to climate change than those comprising phenotypically plastic populations. Assessment of local adaptation generally requires logistically challenging experiments. Here, using a unique approach and a large dataset (>50,000 observations from across Britain), we compare the covariation in temperature and first spawning dates of the common frog (Rana temporaria) across space with that across time. We show that although all populations exhibit a plastic response to temperature, spawning earlier in warmer years, between-population differences in first spawning dates are dominated by local adaptation. Given climate change projections for Britain in 2050–2070, we project that for populations to remain as locally adapted as contemporary populations will require first spawning date to advance by ∼21–39 days but that plasticity alone will only enable an advance of ∼5–9 days. Populations may thus face a microevolutionary and gene flow challenge to advance first spawning date by a further ∼16–30 days over the next 50 years.

[1]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[2]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[3]  T. Beebee,et al.  Amphibian breeding and climate , 1995, Nature.

[5]  J. Murphy,et al.  A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  E. Mayr Animal Species and Evolution , 1964 .

[7]  M. Whitlock Evolutionary inference from QST , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[8]  Martijn van de Pol,et al.  A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  T. Kawecki,et al.  Conceptual issues in local adaptation , 2004 .

[10]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines , 2000, Nature.

[11]  Jarrod Had MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package , 2010 .

[12]  R. Shaw,et al.  Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. , 2001, Science.

[13]  John A. Endler Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. , 1977 .

[14]  J. Bridle,et al.  Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  R. O’Hara,et al.  Latitudinal divergence of common frog (Rana temporaria) life history traits by natural selection: evidence from a comparison of molecular and quantitative genetic data , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[16]  J. Loman Primary and secondary phenology. Does it pay a frog to spawn early , 2009 .

[17]  J. Lindström,et al.  Short- and long-term population dynamical consequences of asymmetric climate change in black grouse , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  T. Sparks,et al.  Vertebrate phenology at similar latitudes: temperature responses differ between Poland and the United Kingdom , 2007 .

[21]  T. Beebee,et al.  Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation , 1997, Heredity.

[22]  K. Gaston,et al.  Urban Domestic Gardens (IV): The Extent of the Resource and its Associated Features , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[23]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Long-term ecological dynamics: reciprocal insights from natural and anthropogenic gradients , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments , 2010 .

[25]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[26]  J. Merilä,et al.  Contrasting patterns of body shape and neutral genetic divergence in marine and lake populations of threespine sticklebacks , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[27]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[28]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Disparities between observed and predicted impacts of climate change on winter bird assemblages , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  J. Merilä,et al.  Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits , 2001 .

[30]  C. Clark,et al.  Pleistocene glacial limits in England, Scotland and Wales , 2004 .

[31]  D. Conover,et al.  Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  C. Miaud,et al.  Variations in life-history traits in the common frog Rana temporaria (Amphibia: Anura): a literature review and new data from the French Alps , 1999 .

[33]  G. Likens,et al.  Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives , 1990 .

[34]  K. Spitze Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. , 1993, Genetics.

[35]  A. Laurila,et al.  Latitudinal countergradient variation in the common frog (Rana temporaria) development rates – evidence for local adaptation , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[36]  P. Gienapp,et al.  Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[37]  T. Sparks,et al.  Influence of temperature on the spatial distribution of first spawning dates of the common frog (Rana temporaria) in the UK , 2009 .

[38]  K. Bachmann Temperature Adaptations of Amphibian Embryos , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  M. Perry,et al.  The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the UK , 2005 .

[41]  R. Lande,et al.  RATE TESTS FOR SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS DURING MACROEVOLUTION AND MICROEVOLUTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  R. Lande STATISTICAL TESTS FOR NATURAL SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Plasticity Versus Environmental Canalization: Population Differences in Thermal Responses Along a Latitudinal Gradient in Drosophila serrata , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.