The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients’ satisfaction with primary care

BACKGROUND: Discussions of end-of-life care should be held prior to acute, disabling events. Many barriers to having such discussions during primary care exist. These barriers include time constraints, communication difficulties, and perhaps physicians’ anxiety that patients might react negatively to such discussions.OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of discussions of advance directives on patients’ satisfaction with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial of the use of computers to remind primary care physicians to discuss advance directives with their elderly, chronically ill patients.SETTING: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice affiliated with an urban teaching hospital.PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred eighty-six patients who were at least 75 years old, or at least 50 years old with serious underlying disease, and their 87 primary care physicians (57 residents, 30 faculty general internists) participated in the study.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed patients’ satisfaction with their primary care physicians and visits via interviews held in the waiting room after completed visits. Controlling for satisfaction at enrollment and physician, patient, and visit factors, discussing advance directives was associated with greater satisfaction with the physician (P=.052). At follow-up, the strongest predictor of satisfaction with the primary care visit was having previously discussed advance directives with that physician (P=.004), with a trend toward greater visit satisfaction when discussions were held during that visit (P=.069). The percentage of patients scoring a visit as “excellent” increased from 34% for visits prior without advance directive discussions to 51% for visits with such discussions (P=.003).CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with chronic illnesses were more satisfied with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits when advanced directives were discussed. The improvement in visit satisfaction was substantial and persistent. This should encourage physicians to initiate such discussions to overcome communication barriers that might result in reduced patient satisfaction levels.

[1]  L. I. Southerland,et al.  A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  P R Lichstein,et al.  Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of elderly persons regarding living wills. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .

[4]  Marion Danis,et al.  Can Clinical Interventions Change Care at the End of Life? , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  C. McDonald,et al.  Action-Orientated Decisions in Ambulatory Medicine , 1981 .

[6]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Systematic implementation of an advance directive program in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial. , 2000, JAMA.

[7]  William A. Knaus,et al.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. , 1995, JAMA.

[8]  R. Fein The academic health center: some policy reflections. , 2000, JAMA.

[9]  C J McDonald,et al.  Practice randomization and clinical research. The Indiana experience. , 1991, Medical care.

[10]  J. Corwin,et al.  Life-sustaining interventions in frail elderly persons. Talking about choices. , 1992, Archives of Internal Medicine.

[11]  W. Tierney,et al.  Measuring patient satisfaction with physicians among older and diseased adults in a primary care municipal outpatient setting. An examination of three instruments. , 1995, Medical care.

[12]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  Advance Directives on Hospital Admission: A Survey of Patient Attitudes , 1993, Southern medical journal.

[13]  C. Chambers,et al.  Relationship of advance directives to hospital charges in a Medicare population. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  J. Lynn,et al.  Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization , 1994, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[15]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  I. J. Polk,et al.  Action-Oriented Decisions in Ambulatory Medicine , 1982 .

[17]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[18]  W M Tierney,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Generated Reminders for Increasing Discussions about Advance Directives and Completion of Advance Directive Forms , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  W H Rogers,et al.  Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1993, JAMA.

[20]  E. Pfeiffer A Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the Assessment of Organic Brain Deficit in Elderly Patients † , 1975, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  M. Gillick The high costs of dying. A way out. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  N. Lurie,et al.  Attitudes toward Discussing Life‐Sustaining Treatments in Extended Care Facility Patients , 1992, Journal of The American Geriatrics Society.

[23]  et al.,et al.  The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[24]  W M Tierney,et al.  Measuring patient satisfaction for quality improvement. , 1999, Medical care.

[25]  R. Langer,et al.  Effects of Offering Advance Directives on Medical Treatments and Costs , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.