The reporting of the risks from genetically modified organisms in the mass media, 2002–2004

This paper describes an analysis of coverage of the risks from agricultural and food genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) from April 2002 to April 2004 in 14 news media from six countries (Canada, France, Germany, Spain, the UK and the USA) which was conducted as part of a review for the European Commission of the management of risk communication. A total of 597 relevant news articles were found and coded for their presentational tone, the types of risk (environmental, financial, health and political, in that order), the organisms described (mainly maize, rape and beet crops), and the documents, people and organisations cited. UK news media tended to be the most “scary” and Spanish ones the most “robust”. Articles quoting public perceptions, non-governmental environmental organisations and politicians tended to emphasize the risks of GMOs; those quoting scientists tended to downplay the risks and describe their potential benefits. Some suggestions for possible action by the European Commission are put forward, such as the facilitation of contact between journalists and scientists, but it is recognized that for some newspapers, their editorial wish to campaign will inevitably over-ride their reporters’ wish to present the truth.

[1]  Richard L. Hellmich,et al.  Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: A risk assessment , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Justin Lewis.  Constructing Public Opinion: How Political Elites Do What They Like and Why We Seem to Go Along with It , 2001 .

[3]  Susanna Hornig Priest,et al.  Mass media and the ultimate technological fix: Newspaper coverage of biotechnology , 1994 .

[4]  T. Eyck,et al.  The National Media and Things Genetic , 2003 .

[5]  B. Dixon.  Genes in food--why the furore? , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[6]  P. Conrad.  Uses of expertise: sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news , 1999 .

[7]  J. Obrycki,et al.  Field deposition of Bt transgenic corn pollen: lethal effects on the monarch butterfly , 2000, Oecologia.

[8]  Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology , 2000, Science and engineering ethics.

[9]  J. Losey,et al.  Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae , 1999, Nature.

[10]  Susanna Hornig Priest,et al.  US public opinion divided over biotechnology? , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  News coverage of biotechnology debates , 2003 .

[12]  George Gaskell,et al.  Europeans and biotechnology in 2002 - Eurobarometer 58.0 : A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project "Life Sciences in European Society" , 2003 .

[13]  Hans Peter Peters,et al.  The committed are hard to persuade. Recipients' thoughts during exposure to newspaper and TV stories on genetic engineering and their effect on attitudes , 2000 .

[14]  L. A. Marks,et al.  MEDIA COVERAGE OF AGROBIOTECHNOLOGY: DID THE BUTTERFLY HAVE AN EFFECT? , 2003 .

[15]  Susan Miles,et al.  The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  J. Durant,et al.  The 'great GM food debate': a survey of media coverage in the first half of 1999. , 2000 .

[17]  I. Economidis,et al.  EC-sponsored research on safety of genetically modified organisms: a review of results. , 2001 .

[18]  G. Gaskell,et al.  Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. , 1999, Science.

[19]  A Deliberative Future? An Independent Evaluation of the GM Nation? Public Debate about the Possible Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain, 2003 (Understanding Risk Working Paper 04-02) , 2004 .

[20]  Steven S. Vickner,et al.  Media Coverage of Biotech Foods and Influence on Consumer Choice , 2004 .

[21]  E. Mullet,et al.  Societal risk perception and media coverage. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Biotechnology and the American Media , 2002 .

[23]  S. Ewen,et al.  Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine , 1999, The Lancet.