Macroevolutionary patterning of woodpecker drums reveals how sexual selection elaborates signals under constraint
暂无分享,去创建一个
Meredith C. Miles | Eric R. Schuppe | Matthew J. Fuxjager | Meredith C Miles | Eric R Schuppe | R Miller Ligon | Matthew J Fuxjager | R. Ligon | R. Miller Ligon
[1] C. Nunn,et al. Sexual dimorphism in primate aerobic capacity: a phylogenetic test , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[2] Peter R. Grant,et al. Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches , 1986 .
[3] Danielle J. Dodenhoff,et al. DO WOODPECKER DRUMS ENCODE INFORMATION FOR SPECIES RECOGNITION? , 2001 .
[4] A. Barron,et al. A systems approach to animal communication , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[5] Pierre-Paul Bitton,et al. Uneven Sampling and the Analysis of Vocal Performance Constraints , 2013, The American Naturalist.
[6] J. Török. Resource partitioning among three woodpecker species Dendrocopos spp. during the breeding season , 1990 .
[7] The social context of a territorial dispute differentially influences the way individuals in breeding pairs coordinate their aggressive tactics , 2016, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[8] Eric R. Schuppe,et al. High‐speed displays encoding motor skill trigger elevated territorial aggression in downy woodpeckers , 2018 .
[9] Matthew R. Wilkins,et al. Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[10] Meredith C. Miles,et al. Biogeography predicts macro‐evolutionary patterning of gestural display complexity in a passerine family , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[11] R. Prum. Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin's really dangerous idea , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[12] M. Andersson,et al. SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF SONG , 1986 .
[13] K. Hughes,et al. Mating advantage for rare males in wild guppy populations , 2013, Nature.
[14] B. Cade,et al. Estimating effects of limiting factors with regression quantiles , 1999 .
[15] J. Tobias,et al. CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF BEAK MORPHOLOGY AND SONG IN THE NEOTROPICAL WOODCREEPER RADIATION , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[16] E. Hebets,et al. The dominance of seismic signaling and selection for signal complexity in Schizocosa multimodal courtship displays , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[17] L. Jenni. Das Skelettmuskelsystem des Halses von Buntspecht und MittelspechtDendrocopos major undmedius , 2005, Journal für Ornithologie.
[18] J. Dale,et al. Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[19] M. Pagel. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.
[20] A. Grafen. Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.
[21] J. Podos. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches , 2001, Nature.
[22] C. Orengo,et al. A rapid method of protein structure alignment. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.
[23] Ryan C. Taylor,et al. Risks of multimodal signaling: bat predators attend to dynamic motion in frog sexual displays , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[24] J. Felsenstein. Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.
[25] N. Seddon. ECOLOGICAL ADAPTATION AND SPECIES RECOGNITION DRIVES VOCAL EVOLUTION IN NEOTROPICAL SUBOSCINE BIRDS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[26] Eileen A Hebets,et al. New dimensions in animal communication: the case for complexity , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.
[27] J. Endler. Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) , 1987, Animal Behaviour.
[28] Matthew J. Fuxjager,et al. Select forelimb muscles have evolved superfast contractile speed to support acrobatic social displays , 2016, eLife.
[29] Yuzhe Liu,et al. How does a woodpecker work? An impact dynamics approach , 2015 .
[30] L. Sneddon,et al. Physiological constraints on contest behaviour , 2007 .
[31] Matthew J Dufort. An augmented supermatrix phylogeny of the avian family Picidae reveals uncertainty deep in the family tree. , 2016, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[32] J. Byers,et al. Female mate choice based upon male motor performance , 2010, Animal Behaviour.
[33] R. Prum. THE LANDE–KIRKPATRICK MECHANISM IS THE NULL MODEL OF EVOLUTION BY INTERSEXUAL SELECTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MEANING, HONESTY, AND DESIGN IN INTERSEXUAL SIGNALS , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[34] R. Meldola. Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.
[35] T. Székely,et al. Sexual size dimorphism in birds , 2007 .
[36] W. Piper,et al. Male Common Loons Signal Greater Aggressive Motivation By Lengthening Territorial Yodels , 2012 .
[37] P. Backwell,et al. Residency and size affect fight duration and outcome in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes , 1996 .
[38] R. Jovani,et al. Colony size and foraging range in seabirds , 2016 .
[39] Tamás Székely,et al. Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior, and resource sharing , 2007 .
[40] R. Prum. Phylogenetic Tests of Alternative Intersexual Selection Mechanisms: Trait Macroevolution in a Polygynous Clade (Aves: Pipridae) , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[41] L. Kilham. Reproductive Behavior of Red-Bellied Woodpeckers , 1961 .
[42] T. Garland,et al. Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .
[43] Liam J. Revell,et al. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things) , 2012 .
[44] Stephen T. Emlen,et al. An Experimental Analysis of the Parameters of Bird Song Eliciting Species Recognition , 1972 .
[45] C. Rowe. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[46] Liam J. Revell,et al. Size-Correction and Principal Components for Interspecific Comparative Studies , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[47] Ryan C. Taylor,et al. Interactions between complex multisensory signal components result in unexpected mate choice responses , 2017, Animal Behaviour.