Sex differences and group argument: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation

In this article, we examine sex differences and similarities in group argument. We begin by positing a theoretical framework for analyzing women's and men's argument in group settings and present this framework as the basis for six hypotheses about women's and men's argument communication. Results of a content analysis of 45 group discussions revealed that women agreed more often, asked more questions, challenged others less often, and qualified others' arguments less often than did men in group argument. Men and women were more similar in their overall production of arguables, objections, and personal narratives. The implications of these findings for future research in this domain are discussed.

[1]  J. A. Robinson,et al.  Personal Narratives Reconsidered , 1981 .

[2]  Locus of control‐based argumentation as a predictor of group polarization , 1982 .

[3]  D. Seibold,et al.  Perspectives on Group Argument: A Critical Review of Persuasive Arguments Theory and an Alternative Structurational View , 1990 .

[4]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Argument in initial group decision‐making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis , 1991 .

[5]  B. Schultz,et al.  Argumentativeness: Its effect in group decision‐making and its role in leadership perception , 1982 .

[6]  Dale E. Brashers,et al.  Expanding the boundaries of small group communication research: Exploring a feminist perspective , 1994 .

[7]  B. Schultz.  Communicative Correlates of Perceived Leaders , 1980 .

[8]  B. F. Sharf,et al.  A rhetorical analysis of leadership emergence in small groups , 1978 .

[9]  Robert D. McPhee,et al.  Group decision‐making as a structurational process , 1985 .

[10]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. , 1986 .

[11]  P. Fishman,et al.  Interaction: The Work Women Do , 1978 .

[12]  bell hooks,et al.  Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center , 1984 .

[13]  Renee A. Meyers,et al.  Testing persuasive argument theory's predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence , 1989 .

[14]  B. Thorne,et al.  Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School , 1993 .

[15]  P. Y. Martin.  RETHINKING FEMINIST ORGANIZATIONS , 1990 .

[16]  A. Mulac,et al.  Male/female language differences and effects in same‐sex and mixed‐sex dyads: The gender‐linked language effect , 1988 .

[17]  Edward J. Murray,et al.  A content-analysis method for studying psychotherapy. , 1956 .

[18]  Karen A. Foss,et al.  Personal Experience as Evidence in Feminist Scholarship. , 1994 .

[19]  John E. Baird,et al.  Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research , 1976 .

[20]  Susan Jarboe,et al.  A comparison of input‐output, process‐output, and input‐process‐output models of small group problem‐solving effectiveness , 1988 .

[21]  Linda L. Carli.  Gender differences in interaction style and influence. , 1989 .

[22]  P. Buzzanell,et al.  Feminine Tensions in Conflict Situations as Revealed by Metaphoric Analyses , 1992 .

[23]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Argument structures in decision‐making groups , 1987 .

[24]  D. Tannen.  You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow , 1990 .

[25]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  In Search of True Causes: Examination of the Effect of Group Potential and Group Interaction on Decision Performance , 1994 .

[26]  Colleen M. Keough.  The nature and function of argument in organizational bargaining research , 1987 .

[27]  Miwha Lee,et al.  Gender, Group Composition, and Peer Interaction in Computer-Based Cooperative Learning , 1993 .

[28]  R. Lakoff.  Language and woman's place , 1973, Language in Society.

[29]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[30]  Daniel J. Canary,et al.  Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication , 1993 .

[31]  Renee A. Meyers,et al.  Persuasive arguments theory: a test of assumptions , 1989 .

[32]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  An Examination of Functional Role Behavior and Its Consequences for Individuals in Group Settings , 1995 .

[33]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Gender, language, and influence , 1990 .

[34]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Status and Participation in Six-Person Groups: A Test of Skvoretz's Comparative Status Model , 1986 .

[35]  Charles Pavitt.  Does communication matter in social influence during small group discussion? Five positions , 1993 .

[36]  Deborah Jones,et al.  Gossip: Notes on women's oral culture , 1980 .

[37]  G. Shepherd.  Communication as influence: Definitional exclusion , 1992 .

[38]  W. Edgar Vinacke,et al.  Sex Roles in a Three-Person Game , 1959 .

[39]  T. Farrell.  The Female and Male Modes of Rhetoric. , 1979 .

[40]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[41]  B. Greenberg,et al.  Sex differences in choice of modes of conflict resolution in real‐life and television , 1979 .

[42]  James-Joseph A. Diliberto.  A Communication Study of Possible Relationships between Psychological Sex Type and Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1992 .

[43]  R. Krauss,et al.  Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. , 1988 .

[44]  Wendy Samter,et al.  Evaluations of communication skills as predictors of peer acceptance in a group living situation , 1990 .

[45]  D. Infante.  The Argumentative Student in the Speech Communication Classroom: An Investigation and Implications. , 1982 .

[46]  E. Counselman.  Leadership in a Long-Term Leaderless Women'S Group , 1991 .

[47]  L. Frey.  Group communication in context : studies of natural groups , 1994 .

[48]  Andrew S. Rancer,et al.  The influence of sex on self‐perceptions and social stereotyping of aggressive communication predispositions , 1994 .

[49]  Robert Trapp,et al.  Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric , 1990 .

[50]  Cindy L. Griffin,et al.  Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric , 1995 .

[51]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysis , 1991 .

[52]  D. Tannen.  Gender and discourse , 1994 .

[53]  Karen A. Foss,et al.  Women Speak: The Eloquence of Women's Lives , 1991 .

[54]  A. Rapoport,et al.  The Game of Chicken , 1966 .

[55]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[56]  R. Shuter.  The alternative institution: A small group study of environmental influence on sex‐role interaction style , 1975 .

[57]  S. Gearhart.  The womanization of rhetoric , 1979 .

[58]  John D. Hatfield,et al.  The Comparative Utility of Three Types of Behavioral Units for Interaction Analysis. , 1978 .

[59]  Susan J. Kalcik,et al.  "... Like Ann's Gynecologist or the Time I Was Almost Raped": Personal Narratives in Women's Rap Groups , 1975 .

[60]  A. Beck.  Love Is Never Enough , 1988 .

[61]  The Role of Disagreement in Interactional Argument. , 1986 .

[62]  James Price Dillard,et al.  FRIENDLY OR UNFRIENDLY PERSUASION The Effects of Violations of Expectations by Males and Females , 1983 .

[63]  Kathy E. Ferguson.  The feminist case against bureaucracy , 1984 .

[64]  S. Kemper.  When to speak like a lady , 1984 .

[65]  L. Gruenfeld,et al.  Masculinity, Femininity, and Behavior in Groups , 1992 .

[66]  Arthur P. Bochner,et al.  Personal Narrative as a Social Approach to Interpersonal Communication , 1992 .

[67]  L. Polanyi.  What Stories Can Tell Us about Their Teller's World , 1981 .

[68]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program , 1981 .

[69]  A. Kohn.  No Contest: The Case Against Competition , 1986 .

[70]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  A descriptive investigation of the possible communication‐based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making , 1983 .

[71]  The power to communicate: Gender differences as barriers , 1985 .

[72]  D. Ellis,et al.  Relational control sequences in sex‐typed and androgynous groups , 1980 .

[73]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Communication and influence in group decision making. , 1996 .

[74]  Robert Trapp,et al.  A Model of Serial Argument in Interpersonal Relationships. , 1985 .

[75]  F. Auld,et al.  Rules for Dividing Interviews Into Sentences , 1956 .

[76]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[77]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Sex Role Differentiation in Jury Deliberations , 1956 .

[78]  K. Dindia,et al.  An Investigation of Female/Male Verbal Behaviors in Same-Sex and Mixed-Sex Conversations. , 1995 .

[79]  Lana F. Rakow.  Women making meaning : new feminist directions in communication , 1992 .

[80]  Julia T. Wood.  Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture , 1993 .

[81]  B. La.  The effects of threat in bargaining: critical and experimental analysis. , 1963 .

[82]  Clarice S. Stoll,et al.  Player Characteristics and Interaction in a Parent-Child Simulation Game , 1969 .

[83]  P. H. Bradley,et al.  Sex, competence and opinion deviation: An expectation states approach , 1980 .

[84]  R. Derry.  An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers , 1989 .

[85]  D. H. Zimmerman,et al.  9. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation , 1996 .

[86]  A. Schaef.  Women's reality : an emerging female system in the white male society , 1981 .

[87]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[88]  Lawrence R. Frey,et al.  Effects of reactions to arguments on group outcome: The case of group polarization , 1983 .

[89]  Dean E. Hewes.  Small Group Communication May Not Influence Decision Making: An Amplification of Socio-Egocentric Theory , 1996 .

[90]  M. Wallach,et al.  Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality , 1965 .

[91]  K. Propp,et al.  An Experimental Examination of Biological Sex as a Status Cue in Decision-Making Groups and Its Influence on Information Use , 1995 .

[92]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[93]  J. W. Balkwell.  From Expectations to Behavior: An Improved Postulate for Expectation States Theory , 1991 .

[94]  Josina M. Makau.  Reasoning and Communication: Thinking Critically About Arguments , 1990 .

[95]  Daniel N. Maltz,et al.  A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication , 1983 .

[96]  Jennifer Coates,et al.  Women in their speech communities : new perspectives on language and sex , 1988 .

[97]  M. Allen,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[98]  William E. Jurma,et al.  Genderless/Gender-Related Task Leader Communication and Group Satisfaction: A Test of Two Hypotheses. , 1980 .