Modeling nutrient consumptions in large flow‐through bioreactors for tissue engineering

Flow‐through bioreactors are utilized in tissue regeneration to ensure complete nutrient distribution and apply defined hydrodynamic stresses. The fundamental concepts in designing these bioreactors for regenerating large high aspect ratio tissues (large surface area relative to the thickness of the matrix such as skin, bladder, and cartilage) are not well defined. Further, tissue regeneration is a dynamic process where the porous characteristics change due to proliferation of cells, de novo deposition of matrix components, and degradation of the porous architecture. These changes affect the transport characteristics and there is an imminent need to understand the influence of these factors. Using computational fluid dynamic tools, changes in the pressure drop, shear stress distribution and nutrient consumption patterns during tissue regeneration were assessed in rectangular and circular reactors described by Lawrence et al. [Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;102(3):935–947]. Further, six new designs with different inlet and outlet shapes were analyzed. The fluid flow was defined by the Brinkman equation on the porous regions using the pore characteristics of 85 µm and 120 pores/mm2. The minimum flow requirements to satisfy nutrient (oxygen and glucose) requirements for three different cell types (SMCs, chondrocytes, and hepatocytes) was evaluated using convective diffusion equation. For consumption reaction, the Michaelis–Menten rate law was used, with constants (km and vm values) extracted from literature. Simulations were performed by varying the flow rate as well as the cell number. One of the circular reactors with semicircular inlet and outlet shape decreased (i) non‐uniformity in hydrodynamic stress within the porous structure and (ii) non‐uniform nutrient distribution. All cell types showed increased consumption of oxygen than glucose. Hepatocytes needed a very high flow rate relative to other cell types. Increase in cell number suggested a need for increasing the flow in circular reactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009;103: 1003–1015. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  R Langer,et al.  Effects of mixing intensity on tissue-engineered cartilage. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  M L Yarmush,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of albumin synthesis rate of porcine hepatocytes in a flat-plate bioreactor. , 2001, Artificial organs.

[3]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Effects of fluid flow on the in vitro degradation kinetics of biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[4]  Margherita Cioffi,et al.  The effect of hydrodynamic shear on 3D engineered chondrocyte systems subject to direct perfusion. , 2006, Biorheology.

[5]  E. Edelman,et al.  Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  M L Yarmush,et al.  Oxygen consumption characteristics of porcine hepatocytes. , 1999, Metabolic engineering.

[7]  J E Mayer,et al.  New pulsatile bioreactor for in vitro formation of tissue engineered heart valves. , 2000, Tissue engineering.

[8]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Mikos,et al.  Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[10]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Tissue engineered bone: measurement of nutrient transport in three-dimensional matrices. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Mineralization capacity of Runx2/Cbfa1-genetically engineered fibroblasts is scaffold dependent. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[12]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Byung-Soo Kim,et al.  Mechano-active tissue engineering of vascular smooth muscle using pulsatile perfusion bioreactors and elastic PLCL scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[14]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  Flow Perfusion Enhances the Calcified Matrix Deposition of Marrow Stromal Cells in Biodegradable Nonwoven Fiber Mesh Scaffolds , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  M. Toner,et al.  Effects of oxygenation and flow on the viability and function of rat hepatocytes cocultured in a microchannel flat-plate bioreactor. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  Cees W J Oomens,et al.  Nutrient utilization by bovine articular chondrocytes: a combined experimental and theoretical approach. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  D. Wendt,et al.  The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  C A Chung,et al.  A compact computational model for cell construct development in perfusion culture. , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  R. Winslow,et al.  Depression of endothelial and smooth muscle cell oxygen consumption by endotoxin. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[20]  C P Chen,et al.  Enhancement of cell growth in tissue‐engineering constructs under direct perfusion: Modeling and simulation , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Y. Huang,et al.  Effect of spatial architecture on cellular colonization. , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  Sundararajan V Madihally,et al.  Flow dynamics in bioreactors containing tissue engineering scaffolds , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Roger Zauel,et al.  3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Sheng Lin-Gibson,et al.  Encapsulated chondrocyte response in a pulsatile flow bioreactor. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[25]  Yan Huang,et al.  In vitro characterization of chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[26]  J. A. Cooper,et al.  Perfusion flow bioreactor for 3D in situ imaging: Investigating cell/biomaterials interactions , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  S L Waters,et al.  Tissue growth in a rotating bioreactor. Part I: mechanical stability. , 2006, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[28]  S L Waters,et al.  Tissue growth in a rotating bioreactor. Part II: fluid flow and nutrient transport problems. , 2007, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[29]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[30]  Patrick Vermette,et al.  Bioreactors for tissue mass culture: design, characterization, and recent advances. , 2005, Biomaterials.